World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9839 9209 432 418 134 5410

Ilja van Beest publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilja van Beest between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilja van Beest published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 21 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 10 publications
1997 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilja van Beest: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 7
2008 8
2009 3
2010 4
2011 8
2012 5
2013 9
2014 5
2015 7
2016 7
2017 8
2018 4
2019 9
2020 11
2021 16
2022 15
2023 5
2024 11
2025 10
Total 166
Download as CSV

Ilja van Beest publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilja van Beest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 134
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ilja van Beest D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilja van Beest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ilja van Beest is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

They focus on several main topics in their work, such as social and intergroup psychology, death anxiety and social exclusion, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, grief, bereavement, and mental health, cultural differences and values, experimental behavioral economics studies, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Their recent research publications include the following:

  • Seeking Solitude After Being Ostracized: A Replication and Beyond, 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Can we reduce facial biases? Persistent effects of facial trustworthiness on sentencing decisions, 2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Moral Frames Are Persuasive and Moralize Attitudes; Nonmoral Frames Are Persuasive and De-Moralize Attitudes, 2022, Psychological Science
  • A Multilab Replication of the Induced-Compliance Paradigm of Cognitive Dissonance, 2024, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Self-interest and data protection drive the adoption and moral acceptability of big data technologies: A conjoint analysis approach, 2020, Computers in Human Behavior

Frequent coauthors in their research career include Willem W. A. Sleegers, Anthony M. Evans, Olga Stavrova, Eric van Dijk, and Thorsten M. Erle.

Ilja van Beest regularly publishes in several venues, particularly:

  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • DataverseNL
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Acta Psychologica

Best Publications

  • When Inclusion Costs and Ostracism Pays, Ostracism Still Hurts

    Ilja van Beest;Kipling D. Williams

  • The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies

    Chris Hubertus Joseph Hartgerink;Ilja Van Beest;Jelte M Wicherts;Kipling D. Williams

  • When Gains Loom Larger Than Losses Reversed Loss Aversion for Small Amounts of Money

    Fieke Harinck;Eric Van Dijk;Ilja Van Beest;Paul Mersmann

  • A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: When communicating anger pays and when it backfires

    Eric van Dijk;Gerben A. van Kleef;Wolfgang Steinel;Ilja van Beest

  • A Theory of Social Thermoregulation in Human Primates

    Hans IJzerman;James A. Coan;Fieke M. A. Wagemans;Marjolein A. Missler

  • Shared Cognition as a Product of, and Precursor to, Shared Identity in Negotiations

    Roderick Swaab;Tom Postmes;Ilja van Beest;Russell Spears

  • Anger in social conflict: Cross-situational comparisons and suggestions for the future

    Gerben A. Van Kleef;Eric van Dijk;Wolfgang Steinel;Fieke Harinck

  • Why Anger and Disappointment Affect Other’s Bargaining Behavior Differently: The Moderating Role of Power and the Mediating Role of Reciprocal and Complementary Emotions

    Gert-Jan Lelieveld;Eric Van Dijk;Ilja Van Beest;Gerben A. Van Kleef

  • Get angry, get out: The interpersonal effects of anger communication in multiparty negotiation

    Ilja Van Beest;Gerben A. Van Kleef;Eric Van Dijk

  • Cyberbomb: Effects of being ostracized from a death game

    Ilja Van Beest;Kipling D. Williams;Eric Van Dijk

  • Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions☆

    Ilja Van Beest;Eric Van Dijk;Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Henk A.M. Wilke

  • The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;David De Cremer;Ilja van Beest;Tomas Ståhl

  • God: Do I have your attention?

    Lorenza S. Colzato;Ilja van Beest;Wery P.M. van den Wildenberg;Claudia Scorolli

  • Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest

    Anna E. van 't Veer;Marielle Stel;Ilja van Beest

  • Seeking Solitude After Being Ostracized: A Replication and Beyond:

    Dongning Ren;Eric D. Wesselmann;Ilja van Beest

  • The Excluded Player in Coalition Formation

    Ilja van Beest;Henk Wilke;Eric van Dijk

  • Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions.

    Gert-Jan Lelieveld;Eric Van Dijk;Ilja Van Beest;Gerben A. Van Kleef

  • Initial Ownership in Bargaining: Introducing the Giving, Splitting, and Taking Ultimatum Bargaining Game:

    Marijke C Leliveld;Eric van Dijk;Ilja van Beest

  • The effects of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness in online peer-to-peer markets

    Bastian Jaeger;Willem W.A. Sleegers;Anthony M. Evans;Mariëlle Stel

  • Can we reduce facial biases? : Persistent effects of facial trustworthiness on sentencing decisions

    Bastian Jaeger;Alexander T. Todorov;Anthony M. Evans;Ilja van Beest

  • Negative thoughts in adults with congenital heart disease.

    Simon Rietveld;Barbara J.M Mulder;Ilja van Beest;Wies Lubbers

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam
Kipling D. Williams
Kipling D. Williams Purdue University West Lafayette
Henk A. M. Wilke
Henk A. M. Wilke Leiden University
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Joris Lammers
Joris Lammers University of Cologne
Eric D. Wesselmann
Eric D. Wesselmann Illinois State University
Pier J. M. Prins
Pier J. M. Prins University of Amsterdam
Tom Postmes
Tom Postmes University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online study options and career pathways. Many students pursue counseling as a specialization, with online counseling degrees providing flexibility for busy schedules and those balancing work or family obligations.

Choosing the right program is important, and each state and region offers unique strengths. For example, you can review the best counseling program rankings in Minnesota to compare different offerings in the Midwest. Students interested in the South can check the best college counseling programs in Mississippi for highly-rated local institutions.

Urban centers present more choices and specialty areas—those seeking programs in urban Tennessee can explore the top counseling degree programs in Nashville. For students considering the East Coast, the best counseling degree programs in the Northeast highlight well-established universities with robust counseling tracks.

Whether you are interested in counseling, school psychology, or clinical practice, researching regional programs helps you find the right fit and maximize your career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Ilja van Beest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles