World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henk A. M. Wilke

Henk A. M. Wilke

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
15344
World Ranking
4922
National Ranking
238

Henk A. M. Wilke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk A. M. Wilke sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Henk A. M. Wilke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk A. M. Wilke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henk A. M. Wilke is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their academic career is situated within this institution, contributing to the research environment and scholarly activities associated with it.

The available data does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to Wilke. Similarly, information on book publications, main fields, subfields, or main research topics is not provided.

There is no record of awards attributed to Wilke in the provided information. No indication exists regarding the scientist being deceased.

This profile reflects the documented affiliations and the absence of further bibliometric or research-related data on Henk A. M. Wilke, focusing solely on verified facts without supplemental interpretation.

Best Publications

  • Explaining Proenvironmental Intention and Behavior by Personal Norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior1

    Paul Harland;Henk Staats;Henk A. M. Wilke

  • Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies.

    Naomi Ellemers;Henk Wilke;Ad van Knippenberg

  • How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect

    K. van den Bos;E.A. Lind;Riël Vermunt;H.A.M. Wilke

  • When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority

    K. van den Bos;H.A.M. Wilke;E.A. Lind

  • Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.

    K. van den Bos;Riël Vermunt;H.A.M. Wilke

  • Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect

    Paul A. M. Van Lange;D. Michael Kuhlman

  • INDIVIDUAL ADAPTATIONS AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGE AS SOLUTIONS TO SOCIAL DILEMMAS

    David M. Messick;Henk Wilke;Marilynn B. Brewer;Roderick M. Kramer

  • Social identification and permeability of group boundaries

    Naomi Ellemers;Ad van Knippenberg;Nanne De Vries;Henk Wilke

  • Situational and Personality Factors as Direct or Personal Norm Mediated Predictors of Pro-environmental Behavior : Questions Derived From Norm-activation Theory

    Paul Harland;Henk Staats;Henk A. M. Wilke

  • The Influence of Permeability of Group Boundaries and Stability of Group Status on Strategies of Individual Mobility and Social Change

    Naomi Ellemers;Ad Van Knippenberg;Henk A. Wilke

  • Effecting Durable Change: A Team Approach to Improve Environmental Behavior in the Household

    Henk Staats;Paul Harland;Henk A. M. Wilke

  • Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Processes in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgments

    K. van den Bos;H.A.M. Wilke;E.A. Lind;Riël Vermunt

  • Undermining trust and cooperation : The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas

    Laetitia B. Mulder;Eric van Dijk;David De Cremer;Henk A.M. Wilke

  • The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory

    K. van den Bos;E.A. Lind;H.A.M. Wilke

  • Social Dilemmas : Theoretical Issues and Research Findings

    Wim B. G. Liebrand;David M. Messick;H. A. M. Wilke

  • Status protection in high status minority groups

    Naomi Ellemers;Bertjan Doosje;Ad Van Knippenberg;Henk Wilke

  • Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures

    Charles D. Samuelson;David M. Messick;Christel G. Rutte;Henk Wilke

  • Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making.

    Michel J. J. Handgraaf;Eric Van Dijk;Riël C. Vermunt;Henk A. M. Wilke

  • Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: a comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas

    Eric van Dijk;Henk Wilke

  • The consistency rule and the voice effect : The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance

    Kees Van Den Bos;Riël Vermunt;Henk A. M. Wilke

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Jan-Willem van Prooijen
Jan-Willem van Prooijen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ilja van Beest
Ilja van Beest Tilburg University
Ad van Knippenberg
Ad van Knippenberg Radboud University
Daan van Knippenberg
Daan van Knippenberg Rice University
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
David M. Messick
David M. Messick Northwestern University
Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology unlocks a wide range of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students interested in psychology often explore related fields like counseling, which offer the ability to make a direct impact on people's well-being through therapy, guidance, and support services.

The demand for well-trained counselors continues to rise, prompting many top universities to offer flexible online degrees. Programs such as the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Florida and top-ranked counseling degree programs in Georgia feature curricula that blend theory, research, and practical skills. In the Northeast, students may consider enrolling in popular counseling programs in Massachusetts, while those in the Midwest can benefit from the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Michigan.

Completing an accredited online counseling degree can lead to fulfilling careers in mental health centers, schools, private practice, and more. As you consider your education in psychology, these related programs and pathways can help you specialize and reach your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Henk A. M. Wilke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles