World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ad van Knippenberg

Ad van Knippenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
16404
World Ranking
6532
National Ranking
298

Ad van Knippenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ad van Knippenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ad van Knippenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ad van Knippenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ad van Knippenberg is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research spans several main fields, including Psychology, Neuroscience, and Social Sciences, with specific work in subfields such as Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research focuses on topics related to Deception detection and forensic psychology, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Misinformation and its Impacts.

They have published in venues such as Frontiers in Psychology. One recent paper is titled The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments, published in 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology.

Ad van Knippenberg has collaborated frequently with coauthors including:

  • Mariëlle Stel
  • annika schwarz
  • Eric van Dijk

Best Publications

  • Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database

    Oliver Langner;Ron Dotsch;Gijsbert Bijlstra;Daniel H. J. Wigboldus

  • Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior

    Rick B. van Baaren;Rob W. Holland;Kerry Kawakami;Ad van Knippenberg

  • The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit.

    A Dijksterhuis;A van Knippenberg

  • Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies.

    Naomi Ellemers;Henk Wilke;Ad van Knippenberg

  • ATTITUDE VERSUS GENERAL HABIT -- ANTECEDENTS OF TRAVEL MODE CHOICE /

    Bas Verplanken;Henk Aarts;Ad van Knippenberg;Carina van Knippenberg

  • The Cessation of Rumination Through Self-Affirmation

    Sander L. Koole;Karianne Smeets;Ad van Knippenberg;Ap Dijksterhuis

  • Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation

    Rick B. van Baaren;Rob W. Holland;Bregje Steenaert;Ad van Knippenberg

  • Literal and symbolic immortality: the effect of evidence of literal immortality on self-esteem striving in response to mortality salience

    Mark Dechesne;Tom Pyszczynski;Jamie Arndt;Sean Ransom

  • Social identification and permeability of group boundaries

    Naomi Ellemers;Ad van Knippenberg;Nanne De Vries;Henk Wilke

  • The Influence of Permeability of Group Boundaries and Stability of Group Status on Strategies of Individual Mobility and Social Change

    Naomi Ellemers;Ad Van Knippenberg;Henk A. Wilke

  • It takes two to mimic: behavioral consequences of self-construals.

    Rick B. van Baaren;William W. Maddux;Tanya L. Chartrand;Cris de Bouter

  • On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: the strong guide, the weak follow

    Rob W. Holland;Bas Verplanken;Ad Van Knippenberg

  • Motivated Social Cognition: Need for Closure Effects on Memory and Judgment

    Ap Dijksterhuis;Ad van Knippenberg;Arie W. Kruglanski;Carel Schaper

  • Status protection in high status minority groups

    Naomi Ellemers;Bertjan Doosje;Ad Van Knippenberg;Henk Wilke

  • Derogation and distancing as terror management strategies: The moderating role of need for closure and permeability of group boundaries.

    Mark Dechesne;Jacques Janssen;Ad van Knippenberg

  • Ethnic Out-Group Faces Are Biased in the Prejudiced Mind

    Ron Dotsch;Daniël H.J. Wigboldus;Oliver Langner;Ad van Knippenberg

  • The Role of Facial Mimicry in the Recognition of Affect

    Mariëlle Stel;Ad van Knippenberg

  • When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation

    Harm Veling;Rob W. Holland;Ad van Knippenberg

  • Finding Comfort in a Joke: Consolatory Effects of Humor Through Cognitive Distraction

    Madelijn Strick;Rob W. Holland;Rick B. van Baaren;Ad van Knippenberg

  • Social comparison processes among cancer patients.

    Eric Molleman;Jean Pruyn;Ad van Knippenberg

  • From repetition to conviction: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty

    Rob W Holland;Bas Verplanken;Ad van Knippenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Rob W. Holland
Rob W. Holland Radboud University
Ap Dijksterhuis
Ap Dijksterhuis Radboud University
Rick B. van Baaren
Rick B. van Baaren Radboud University
Daniël H. J. Wigboldus
Daniël H. J. Wigboldus Radboud University
Harm Veling
Harm Veling Radboud University
Bas Verplanken
Bas Verplanken University of Bath
Henk A. M. Wilke
Henk A. M. Wilke Leiden University
Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University
Sander L. Koole
Sander L. Koole Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to several rewarding career paths, with many options available online. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), but requirements vary by location. For example, Oakland mft education requirements include completing a graduate program and supervised clinical experience.

If you're planning to practice in Oklahoma, understanding mft requirements in Oklahoma City is crucial. These typically involve state-specific coursework and exams. Meanwhile, aspiring therapists in Nebraska should review the Omaha mft education requirements for details on necessary credentials and licensure.

In Florida, mft requirements in Orlando emphasize both academic preparation and hands-on training. No matter where you intend to work, accredited online psychology programs can help you meet these regional requirements and provide flexible pathways to a fulfilling mental health career.

Best Scientists Citing Ad van Knippenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles