World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4055
World Ranking
10286
National Ranking
456

Harm Veling publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm Veling sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Harm Veling D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harm Veling sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet. Effects on body weight.

    Harm Veling;Harm Veling;Guido M van Koningsbruggen;Henk Aarts;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation

    Harm Veling;Rob W. Holland;Ad van Knippenberg

  • Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods.

    Harm Veling;Henk Aarts;Esther K. Papies

  • Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods

    Harm Veling;Henk Aarts;Wolfgang Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Remembering can cause inhibition: Retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process

    Harm Veling;Ad van Knippenberg

  • What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda

    Harm Veling;Natalia S. Lawrence;Zhang Chen;Guido M. van Koningsbruggen

  • How Does Not Responding to Appetitive Stimuli Cause Devaluation: Evaluative Conditioning or Response Inhibition?

    Zhang Chen;Harm Veling;Ap Dijksterhuis;Rob W. Holland

  • Stop signals decrease choices for palatable foods through decreased food evaluation

    Harm Veling;Henk Aarts;Wolfgang Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Training motor responses to food: A novel treatment for obesity targeting implicit processes.

    Eric Stice;Natalia S. Lawrence;Eva Kemps;Harm Veling

  • Comparing two psychological interventions in reducing impulsive processes of eating behaviour: effects on self-selected portion size.

    Guido M. van Koningsbruggen;Harm Veling;Harm Veling;Wolfgang Stroebe;Wolfgang Stroebe;Henk Aarts

  • Pilot test of a novel food response and attention training treatment for obesity: Brain imaging data suggest actions shape valuation.

    Eric Stice;Sonja Yokum;Harm Veling;Eva Kemps

  • Healthy dining. Subtle diet reminders at the point of purchase increase low-calorie food choices among both chronic and current dieters.

    Esther K. Papies;Harm Veling

  • Boosting or choking--how conscious and unconscious reward processing modulate the active maintenance of goal-relevant information.

    Claire M. Zedelius;Harm Veling;Henk Aarts

  • The Relationship Between Online Vigilance and Affective Well-Being in Everyday Life: Combining Smartphone Logging with Experience Sampling

    Niklas Johannes;Adrian Meier;Leonard Reinecke;Saara Ehlert

  • The Art of Anger Reward Context Turns Avoidance Responses to Anger-Related Objects Into Approach

    Henk Aarts;Kirsten I. Ruys;Harm Veling;Robert A. Renes

  • The Influence of Facial Attractiveness on Imitation

    Matthijs L. van Leeuwen;Harm Veling;Rick B. van Baaren;Ap Dijksterhuis

  • Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task.

    Harm Veling;Henk Aarts

  • Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet : Effects on body weight

    H.P. Veling;G.M. van Koningsbruggen;H.A.G. Aarts;W. Stroebe

  • Training impulsive choices for healthy and sustainable food.

    Harm Veling;Zhang Chen;Merel C. Tombrock;Iris A. M. Verpaalen

  • Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.

    Zhang Chen;Harm Veling;Ap Dijksterhuis;Rob W. Holland

Frequent Co-Authors

Rob W. Holland
Rob W. Holland Radboud University
Henk Aarts
Henk Aarts Utrecht University
Moniek Buijzen
Moniek Buijzen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ap Dijksterhuis
Ap Dijksterhuis Radboud University
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Ad van Knippenberg
Ad van Knippenberg Radboud University
Natalia Lawrence
Natalia Lawrence University of Exeter
Sabine A. E. Geurts
Sabine A. E. Geurts Radboud University
Ruud Custers
Ruud Custers Utrecht University
Isabela Granic
Isabela Granic Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Harm Veling

Recently Published Articles