World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5137 4763 243 233 147 13596

Isabela Granic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Isabela Granic between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Isabela Granic published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2018. 6 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2018. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1998 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Isabela Granic: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 5
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 3
2010 7
2011 4
2012 8
2013 4
2014 6
2015 7
2016 13
2017 11
2018 17
2019 10
2020 15
2021 14
2022 3
2023 0
2024 2
2025 4
Total 155
Download as CSV

Isabela Granic publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabela Granic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Isabela Granic D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabela Granic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Isabela Granic is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple aspects of psychology and social sciences, focusing particularly on the intersection of technology and adolescent development.

The main fields of study in Granic's work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their contributions cover several subfields such as:

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education

Granic's research topics highlight their interest in digital influences on youth and mental health, encompassing:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Their publication record includes papers in various journals, with notable works including:

  • Beyond Screen Time: Identity Development in the Digital Age, 2020, Psychological Inquiry
  • Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Biofeedback Game (DEEP) to Reduce Anxiety and Disruptive Classroom Behavior: Single-Case Study, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • Toward improved methods in social media research., 2020, Technology Mind and Behavior
  • An Integrative Model for the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Interventions for Anxiety Regulation: Viewpoint, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Effects of the video game 'Mindlight' on anxiety of children with an autism spectrum disorder: A randomized controlled trial, 2020, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Granic include:

  • Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff
  • Marieke van Rooij
  • Hanneke Scholten
  • Rutger C. M. E. Engels
  • Aniek Wols

Common venues for Granic's scholarly work reflect their focus on psychology and technology related research, featuring multiple publications in:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Psychological Inquiry
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Games for Health Journal

Best Publications

  • The benefits of playing video games

    Isabela Granic;Adam Lobel;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

  • Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: a dynamic systems approach.

    Isabela Granic;Gerald R. Patterson

  • Rigidity in Parent-Child Interactions and the Development of Externalizing and Internalizing Behavior in Early Childhood

    Tom Hollenstein;Isabela Granic;Mike Stoolmiller;James Snyder

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

  • Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology

    Isabela Granic;Tom Hollenstein

  • Emotion, development, and self-organization : dynamic systems approaches to emotional development

    Marc D. Lewis;Isabela Granic

  • Longitudinal Analysis of Flexibility and Reorganization in Early Adolescence: A Dynamic Systems Study of Family Interactions

    Isabela Granic;Tom Hollenstein;Thomas J. Dishion;Gerald R. Patterson

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • A Dynamic Systems Analysis of Parent-child Changes Associated with Successful "Real-world" Interventions for Aggressive Children

    Isabela Granic;Arland O’Hara;Debra Pepler;Marc D. Lewis

  • Video gaming and children's psychosocial wellbeing: a longitudinal study

    Adam Lobel;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Lisanne L. Stone;William J. Burk

  • Timing is everything: Developmental psychopathology from a dynamic systems perspective

    Isabela Granic

  • Deviant talk in adolescent friendships: A step toward measuring a pathogenic attractor process

    Isabela Granic;Thomas J. Dishion

  • Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes.

    Isabela Granic;Alex V. Lamey

  • The Family Ecology of Adolescence: A Dynamic Systems Perspective on Normative Development

    Isabela Granic;Thomas J. Dishion;Tom Hollenstein

  • A neurofeedback video game (MindLight) to prevent anxiety in children

    Elke A. Schoneveld;Monique Malmberg;Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff;Geert P. Verheijen

  • Beyond Screen Time: Identity Development in the Digital Age

    Isabela Granic;Hiromitsu Morita;Hanneke Scholten

  • Pragmatism in modeling peer influence: Dynamics, outcomes, and change processes

    Thomas J. Dishion;Bernadette Marie Bullock;Isabela Granic

  • Emotion regulation in action: Use, selection, and success of emotion regulation in adolescents’ daily lives:

    Hannah K. Lennarz;Tom Hollenstein;Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff;Emmanuel Kuntsche

  • DEEP: A Biofeedback Virtual Reality Game for Children At-risk for Anxiety

    Marieke van Rooij;Adam Lobel;Owen Harris;Niki Smit

  • Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children with behavior problems.

    Marc D. Lewis;Isabela Granic;Connie Lamm;Philip David Zelazo

  • Neurophysiological mechanisms of emotion regulation for subtypes of externalizing children.

    Jim Stieben;Marc D. Lewis;Isabela Granic;Philip David Zelazo

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

Frequent Co-Authors

Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marc D. Lewis
Marc D. Lewis University of Toronto
Tom Hollenstein
Tom Hollenstein Queen's University
Geertjan Overbeek
Geertjan Overbeek University of Amsterdam
Debra Pepler
Debra Pepler York University
Thomas J. Dishion
Thomas J. Dishion Arizona State University
Roy Otten
Roy Otten Radboud University
Philip David Zelazo
Philip David Zelazo University of Minnesota
Doeschka J. Anschutz
Doeschka J. Anschutz Radboud University
Emmanuel Kuntsche
Emmanuel Kuntsche La Trobe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in psychology, there are several related online degrees that can lead to compelling career pathways in mental health, counseling, and social work. Online programs are increasingly popular for their flexibility and accessibility, making it possible to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

Social work is closely related to psychology and offers numerous opportunities to support individuals and communities. For those pursuing this path, it is important to consider accredited programs that provide both value and quality. If you're exploring broader options, learn more about the most valuable online social work programs in the US.

Location-specific opportunities also exist for those living in or near certain states. If you reside in Connecticut, take a look at the best value online social work programs in Connecticut. For students in Iowa, specifically Dubuque, there are best value online social work degrees in Dubuque. Indiana residents can also find the best value online social work programs in Indiana to support their career goals.

Choosing the right degree will open doors to various careers such as licensed counselor, social worker, or behavioral health specialist. Carefully research your options to find the program that aligns with your interests and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Isabela Granic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles