World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Doeschka J. Anschutz

Doeschka J. Anschutz

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
3371
World Ranking
11391
National Ranking
493

Doeschka J. Anschutz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doeschka J. Anschutz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Doeschka J. Anschutz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doeschka J. Anschutz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Doeschka J. Anschutz is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a focus on subfields such as sociology and political science, education, social psychology, communication, and clinical psychology.

Their work covers several core topics, including child development and digital technology, bullying, victimization, and aggression, as well as the impact of technology on adolescents. Additional areas of research interest include social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, behavioral health and interventions, and media influence and health.

Frequent coauthors of Doeschka J. Anschutz include Moniek Buijzen, Daniëlle N. M. Bleize, Martin Tanis, Frans Folkvord, and Freek Snelting. Their collaborations reflect a multidisciplinary approach that connects social behavior, media influence, and health interventions.

Their research findings have been published in various academic journals, notably:

  • Journal of Children and Media (2 publications)
  • Computers in Human Behavior (1 publication)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 publication)
  • Games for Health Journal (1 publication)
  • Social Development (1 publication)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Anschutz are:

  • "The effects of group centrality and accountability on conformity to cyber aggressive norms: Two messaging app experiments" (2021), published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Effect of Source Type and Protective Message on the Critical Evaluation of News Messages on Facebook: Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands" (2021), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "A Health Game Targeting Children's Implicit Attitudes and Snack Choices" (2020), published in Games for Health Journal
  • "A social identity perspective on conformity to cyber aggression among early adolescents on WhatsApp" (2021), published in Social Development
  • "Behind the policy frontline in the Netherlands during the Corona crisis" (2021), published in Journal of Children and Media

Best Publications

  • Picture Perfect: The Direct Effect of Manipulated Instagram Photos on Body Image in Adolescent Girls

    Mariska Kleemans;Serena Daalmans;Ilana Carbaat;Doeschka Anschütz

  • Exposure to slim images in mass media: Television commercials as reminders of restriction in restrained eaters

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Tatjana van Strien;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

  • Moderation of distress-induced eating by emotional eating scores.

    Tatjana van Strien;C. Peter Herman;Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rutger C.M.E. Engels

  • The effect of playing advergames that promote energy-dense snacks or fruit on actual food intake among children

    Frans Folkvord;Doeschka J Anschütz;Moniek Buijzen;Patti M Valkenburg

  • Food advertising and eating behavior in children

    Frans Folkvord;Frans Folkvord;Doeschka J Anschütz;Emma Boyland;Bridget Kelly

  • The role of attentional bias in the effect of food advertising on actual food intake among children

    Frans Folkvord;Doeschka J. Anschütz;Reinout W. Wiers;Moniek Buijzen

  • Food advertising and eating behaviour in children

    Frans Folkvord;Doeschka J Anschutz;Emma J Boyland;Bridget Kelly

  • Impulsivity, “Advergames,” and Food Intake

    Frans Folkvord;Doeschka J. Anschutz;Chantal Nederkoorn;Henk Westerik

  • The Predictive Validity of the DEBQ-External Eating Scale For Eating in Response to Food Commercials While Watching Television

    Tatjana van Strien;C. Peter Herman;Doeschka Anschutz

  • Eating styles and energy intake in young women.

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Tatjana Van Strien;Monique O.M. Van De Ven;Rutger C.M.E. Engels

  • Do We Act upon What We See? Direct Effects of Alcohol Cues in Movies on Young Adults’ Alcohol Drinking

    Renske Koordeman;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rick B. van Baaren

  • Social norms in food intake among normal weight and overweight children

    Kirsten E. Bevelander;Doeschka J. Anschütz;Rutger C.M.E. Engels

  • The effects of TV commercials using less thin models on young women's mood, body image and actual food intake

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rutger C.M.E. Engels;Eni S. Becker;Tatjana Van Strien

  • Maternal Behaviors and Restrained Eating and Body Dissatisfaction in Young Children

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Linda J.A. Kanters;Tatjana Van Strien;Ad A. Vermulst

  • The bold and the beautiful. Influence of body size of televised media models on body dissatisfaction and actual food intake.

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rutger C.M.E. Engels;Eni S. Becker;Tatjana van Strien

  • Side effects of television food commercials on concurrent nonadvertised sweet snack food intakes in young children

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Tatjana Van Strien

  • Effects of alcohol portrayals in movies on actual alcohol consumption: an observational experimental study.

    Renske Koordeman;Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rick B. van Baaren;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

  • Watching your weight? The relations between watching soaps and music television and body dissatisfaction and restrained eating in young girls.

    Doeschka Anschutz;Rutger Engels;Jan Van Leeuwe;Tatjana van Strien

  • Sex differences in young adults' snack food intake after food commercial exposure.

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rutger C.M.E. Engels;Carmen S. van der Zwaluw;Tatjana Van Strien

  • The effects of playing with thin dolls on body image and food intake in young girls

    Doeschka J. Anschutz;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

Frequent Co-Authors

Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tatjana van Strien
Tatjana van Strien Radboud University
Moniek Buijzen
Moniek Buijzen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eni S. Becker
Eni S. Becker Radboud University
Rick B. van Baaren
Rick B. van Baaren Radboud University
Isabela Granic
Isabela Granic Radboud University
Emmanuel Kuntsche
Emmanuel Kuntsche La Trobe University
Rob W. Holland
Rob W. Holland Radboud University
C. Peter Herman
C. Peter Herman University of Toronto
Herbert L. Meiselman
Herbert L. Meiselman Herb Meiselman Training and Consulting

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online program options and career pathways, particularly for aspiring counselors. Many states now offer flexible, accredited online master's degrees or certifications designed to help students quickly enter the workforce.

For those interested in a focused region or state-specific path, it's important to understand how requirements and timelines can vary. Resources such as finding the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Utah or learning about the fastest way to become a counselor in Vermont can provide state-specific guidance.

If you’d like to compare programs, information on Virginia fastest counseling programs and options for the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Washington can help you evaluate the best route for your goals.

Online degrees can streamline your journey, offering schedules that fit your lifestyle. Always verify that your program meets your state’s licensing requirements to ensure a smooth transition to your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Doeschka J. Anschutz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles