World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
9791
World Ranking
4645
National Ranking
2580

Herbert L. Meiselman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert L. Meiselman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Herbert L. Meiselman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herbert L. Meiselman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Herbert L. Meiselman is affiliated with Herb Meiselman Training and Consulting in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on sensory and consumer science, with a notable body of work that intersects agricultural and biological sciences as well as psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including:

  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Color Perception and Design
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Wine Industry and Tourism

Meiselman's main research fields are listed as Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Psychology, with subfields covering Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Animal Science and Zoology.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Foods
  • Current Opinion in Food Science
  • International Journal of Food Design

Collaborations with other researchers are part of Meiselman's profile, with frequent co-authors including Sara R. Jaeger, Davide Giacalone, Carla Kuesten, Jian Bi, and Sol Zamuz.

Some recent publications authored or co-authored by Meiselman are:

  • "Approaching 100 years of sensory and consumer science: Developments and ongoing issues," 2022, Food Quality and Preference
  • "The (gradual) development of emotion measurement for food," 2021, Current Opinion in Food Science

Other notable papers in which Meiselman is not the primary author but related by collaborative contexts include:

  • "Consumption Context Effects on Fine Wine Consumer Segments' Liking and Emotions," 2020, Foods
  • "The potential of using emoji instead of words when measuring emotions associated with food," 2021, Food Quality and Preference
  • "Sensory and consumer science: A complex, expanding, and interdisciplinary field of science," 2024, Food Quality and Preference

The scope of Meiselman's research addresses sensory evaluation methods and the emotional aspects related to food consumption, as well as multisensory and biochemical approaches linked to food quality and consumer preferences.

Best Publications

  • Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods.

    H. Tuorila;H.L. Meiselman;R. Bell;A.V. Cardello

  • Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance.

    H.L. Meiselman;J.L. Johnson;W. Reeve;J.E. Crouch

  • Food Choice, Acceptance and Consumption

    H. L. Meiselman;H. J. H. MacFie

  • The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability

    Silvia C. King;Annette J. Weber;Herbert L. Meiselman;Nan Lv

  • The influence of eating location on the acceptability of identically prepared foods

    John S.A Edwards;Herbert L Meiselman;Audrey Edwards;Larry Lesher

  • Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires

    Armand V. Cardello;Herbert L. Meiselman;Howard G. Schutz;Caelli Craig

  • Methodology and theory in human eating research.

    Herbert L. Meiselman

  • The future in sensory/consumer research: ……….....evolving to a better science

    Herbert L. Meiselman

  • The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study

    Silvia C. King;Herbert L. Meiselman;Annette W. Hottenstein;Therese M. Work

  • Measuring emotions associated with foods in consumer testing

    Silvia C. King;Herbert L. Meiselman;B. Thomas Carr

  • A review of the current state of emotion research in product development

    Herbert L. Meiselman

  • Validity of telephoned diet recalls and records for assessment of individual food intake.

    N J Krantzler;B J Mullen;H G Schutz;L E Grivetti

  • Development of EsSense25, a shorter version of the EsSense Profile®

    Michael A. Nestrud;Michael A. Nestrud;Herbert L. Meiselman;Silvia C. King;Larry L. Lesher

  • Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods

    Hely M Tuorila;Herbert L Meiselman;Armand V Cardello;Larry L Lesher

  • Dimensions of the meal : the science, culture, business, and art of eating

    Herbert L. Meiselman

  • Soldier performance and strenuous road marching: influence of load mass and load distribution.

    Joseph J. Knapik;Philip Ang;Herbert Meiselman;Wendy Johnson

  • The effects of variety and monotony on food acceptance and intake at a midday meal.

    Herbert L Meiselman;Cees deGraaf;Larry L Lesher

  • Food acceptability in field studies with US army men and women: relationship with food intake and food choice after repeated exposures.

    Cees de Graaf;F. Matthew Kramer;Herbert L. Meiselman;Larry L. Lesher

  • Validity of a food frequency questionnaire for the determination of individual food intake.

    B J Mullen;N J Krantzler;L E Grivetti;H G Schutz

  • Dimensions of the meal

    Herbert L. Meiselman

  • A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: the role of choice.

    Cees de Graaf;Armand V. Cardello;F. Matthew Kramer;Larry L. Lesher

  • Longitudinal measurement of three eating behavior scales during a period of change

    Herbert L. Meiselman;George Mastroianni;Mark Buller;John Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Armand V. Cardello
Armand V. Cardello United States Department of the Army
Howard R. Moskowitz
Howard R. Moskowitz United States Department of the Army
Hely Tuorila
Hely Tuorila University of Helsinki
Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gerry Jager
Gerry Jager Wageningen University & Research
Doeschka J. Anschutz
Doeschka J. Anschutz Radboud University
Linda M. Bartoshuk
Linda M. Bartoshuk University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens many doors—both academically and professionally. Online programs now make it easier than ever to study flexibly, whether you are starting your journey or advancing your qualifications. However, transitioning from education to a career as a licensed therapist involves meeting specific requirements that vary by location.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a therapist in California, it's important to understand the Long Beach licensed therapist requirements and the steps involved in how to become a licensed therapist in Los Angeles. Similarly, those looking to practice elsewhere must be aware that requirements differ by state and city. For instance, compare the Louisville licensed therapist education requirements with the Lubbock licensed therapist education requirements to see how licensing criteria can change.

When choosing an online psychology degree, consider programs that align with your career goals and fulfill the licensing prerequisites of the region where you wish to practice. Researching these pathways early will help ensure a smoother transition from study to a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Herbert L. Meiselman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles