World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
19041
World Ranking
3690
National Ranking
1182

Daniel P. Raleigh publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Raleigh sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 300 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Daniel P. Raleigh D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Raleigh sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel P. Raleigh is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with notable contributions to Molecular Biology, Physiology, Materials Chemistry, Surgery, and Cell Biology as subfields of study.

The main topics addressed in their work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Enzyme Structure and Function, Pancreatic function and diabetes, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease, Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms, and Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Daniel P. Raleigh include Alexander Zhyvoloup, Lakshan Manathunga, Erwin London, Junjie Zou, and Konstantinos Thalassinos.

Their recent papers illustrate the breadth of their research interests and contributions. These include:

  • "Cyclic Ion Mobility-Collision Activation Experiments Elucidate Protein Behavior in the Gas Phase" (2021), published in the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • "Islet amyloid polypeptide aggregation exerts cytotoxic and proinflammatory effects on the islet vasculature in mice" (2022), published in Diabetologia
  • "Analysis of Baboon IAPP Provides Insight into Amyloidogenicity and Cytotoxicity of Human IAPP" (2020), published in Biophysical Journal
  • "Analysis of Proline Substitutions Reveals the Plasticity and Sequence Sensitivity of Human IAPP Amyloidogenicity and Toxicity" (2020), published in Biochemistry
  • "Protein unfolded states populated at high and ambient pressure are similarly compact" (2021), published in Biophysical Journal

Daniel P. Raleigh's work regularly appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Biophysical Journal, Biophysical Chemistry, Diabetologia, and the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

Best Publications

  • Rotational resonance in solid state NMR

    D.P. Raleigh;M.H. Levitt;R.G. Griffin

  • Theory and simulations of homonuclear spin pair systems in rotating solids

    M. H. Levitt;D. P. Raleigh;F. Creuzet;R. G. Griffin

  • Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher-order chromatin compaction

    Beat Fierz;Champak Chatterjee;Champak Chatterjee;Robert K McGinty;Maya Bar-Dagan

  • De novo design of helical bundles as models for understanding protein folding and function.

    R B Hill;D P Raleigh;A Lombardi;W F DeGrado

  • The Flavanol (−)-Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate Inhibits Amyloid Formation by Islet Amyloid Polypeptide, Disaggregates Amyloid Fibrils and Protects Cultured Cells Against IAPP Induced Toxicity

    Fanling Meng;Andisheh Abedini;Annette Plesner;C. Bruce Verchere

  • Two-dimensional IR spectroscopy and isotope labeling defines the pathway of amyloid formation with residue-specific resolution

    Sang Hee Shim;Ruchi Gupta;Yun L. Ling;David B. Strasfeld

  • Screening and classifying small-molecule inhibitors of amyloid formation using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry

    Lydia M. Young;Janet C. Saunders;Rachel A. Mahood;Charlotte H. Revill

  • Mechanism of IAPP amyloid fibril formation involves an intermediate with a transient β-sheet

    Lauren E. Buchanan;Emily B. Dunkelberger;Huong Q. Tran;Pin Nan Cheng

  • Rational modification of protein stability by the mutation of charged surface residues.

    Shari Spector;Minghui Wang;Stefan A. Carp;James Robblee

  • Islet Amyloid Polypeptide: Structure, Function, and Pathophysiology.

    Rehana Akter;Ping Cao;Harris Noor;Zachary Ridgway

  • Protein folding: defining a "standard" set of experimental conditions and a preliminary kinetic data set of two-state proteins.

    Karen L. Maxwell;David Wildes;Arash Zarrine-Afsar;Miguel A. De Los Rios

  • A role for helical intermediates in amyloid formation by natively unfolded polypeptides

    Andisheh Abedini;Daniel P Raleigh

  • Effects of Sequential Proline Substitutions on Amyloid Formation by Human Amylin20-29†

    Daniel F. Moriarty;Daniel P. Raleigh

  • A critical assessment of the role of helical intermediates in amyloid formation by natively unfolded proteins and polypeptides

    Andisheh Abedini;Daniel P. Raleigh

  • Analysis of amylin cleavage products provides new insights into the amyloidogenic region of human amylin.

    Melanie R Nilsson;Daniel P Raleigh

  • Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy reveals the complex behaviour of an amyloid fibril inhibitor

    Chris T. Middleton;Peter Marek;Ping Cao;Chi Cheng Chiu

  • Ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry defines the oligomeric intermediates in amylin amyloid formation and the mode of action of inhibitors.

    Lydia M. Young;Ping Cao;Daniel P. Raleigh;Alison E. Ashcroft

  • De novo protein design: from molten globules to native-like states

    Stephen F. Betz;Daniel P. Raleigh;William F. DeGrado

  • A single-point mutation converts the highly amyloidogenic human islet amyloid polypeptide into a potent fibrillization inhibitor

    Andisheh Abedini;Fanling Meng;Daniel P Raleigh

  • The role of His-18 in amyloid formation by human islet amyloid polypeptide.

    Andisheh Abedini;Daniel P Raleigh

  • De novo Design of Helical Bundles as Models for Understanding Protein Folding and Function

    R. Blake Hill;Daniel P. Raleigh;Angela Lombardi;William F. Degrado

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin T. Zanni
Martin T. Zanni University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ann Marie Schmidt
Ann Marie Schmidt New York University
Robert Fairman
Robert Fairman Haverford College
Brian Kuhlman
Brian Kuhlman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William F. DeGrado
William F. DeGrado University of California, San Francisco
R. Brian Dyer
R. Brian Dyer Emory University
Sheena E. Radford
Sheena E. Radford University of Leeds
Malcolm H. Levitt
Malcolm H. Levitt University of Southampton
Tom W. Muir
Tom W. Muir Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways beyond traditional lab roles. Many students choose online degrees to build flexible, specialized skills tailored to industries like healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and forensic science.

For those interested in the pharmaceutical sector, understanding how do you become a pharmacist can guide your educational journey. This path typically involves advanced degrees and licensure but offers a rewarding career with competitive salaries.

If sales and client interaction appeal more, exploring how much do pharmaceutical reps make provides insight into this lucrative role. This pathway often requires strong communication skills combined with scientific knowledge.

For careers in legal or forensics, chemistry graduates might consider roles similar to paralegals or autopsy technicians. Learning what types of paralegals make the most money can help tailor your qualifications. Additionally, understanding how to become an autopsy technician offers a specialized career path merging chemistry with forensic science.

Online degrees give you flexibility to blend theory and practical skills, enabling you to navigate these varied fields effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Raleigh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles