World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
30830
World Ranking
6554
National Ranking
2842

Timothy O. Laumann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy O. Laumann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 91 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Timothy O. Laumann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy O. Laumann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy O. Laumann is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience and advanced neuroimaging techniques.

Their publication record includes numerous contributions to scientific understanding in these areas, especially related to functional brain connectivity and the application of advanced MRI techniques. Their work also covers neural dynamics, brain function, and aspects of mental health research.

Frequent topics addressed in their research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies

Among recent papers, notable publications are:

  • "Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals," 2022, Nature
  • "A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex," 2023, Nature
  • "Towards Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Plasticity and Spontaneous Activity Pulses in Disused Human Brain Circuits," 2020, Neuron
  • "Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Laumann frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Nico U.F. Dosenbach
  • Evan M. Gordon
  • Scott Marek
  • Abraham Z. Snyder
  • Benjamin P. Kay

Their work is published in a range of prominent venues, featuring multiple papers in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory),
  • Nature,
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
  • Cerebral Cortex,
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

The scientist's focus on cognitive neuroscience includes subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, and clinical psychology. The combination of interdisciplinary fields and topics highlights the comprehensive approach toward brain research and neuroimaging techniques in their academic career.

Best Publications

  • Functional network organization of the human brain

    Jonathan D. Power;Alexander L. Cohen;Steven M. Nelson;Gagan S. Wig

  • Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI

    Jonathan D. Power;Anish Mitra;Timothy O. Laumann;Abraham Z. Snyder

  • Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI

    Alexander Schaefer;Ru Kong;Evan M Gordon;Timothy O Laumann

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

    Unknown

  • Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project

    S M Smith;C F Beckmann;J Andersson;E J Auerbach

  • Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations

    Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Babatunde Adeyemo;Jeremy F. Huckins

  • Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains

    Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Adrian W. Gilmore;Adrian W. Gilmore;Dillan J. Newbold

  • Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain.

    Timothy O. Laumann;Evan M. Gordon;Babatunde Adeyemo;Abraham Z. Snyder

  • Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation

    Caterina Gratton;Timothy O. Laumann;Ashley N. Nielsen;Deanna J. Greene

  • Informatics and data mining tools and strategies for the human connectome project.

    Daniel S. Marcus;John W. Harwell;Timothy R. Olsen;Michael R. Hodge

  • Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans.

    Jonathan D. Power;Mark Plitt;Timothy O. Laumann;Alex Martin

  • A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex

    Unknown

  • On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations

    Timothy O. Laumann;Abraham Z. Snyder;Anish Mitra;Evan M. Gordon

  • Long-term neural and physiological phenotyping of a single human

    Russell A. Poldrack;Russell A. Poldrack;Timothy O. Laumann;Oluwasanmi Koyejo;Brenda Gregory

  • Data Quality Influences Observed Links Between Functional Connectivity and Behavior

    Joshua S. Siegel;Anish Mitra;Timothy O. Laumann;Benjamin A. Seitzman

  • Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Individual Human Cerebellum

    Scott Marek;Joshua S. Siegel;Evan M. Gordon;Evan M. Gordon;Ryan V. Raut

  • Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI

    Raphael Liegeois;Timothy O Laumann;Abraham Z Snyder;Juan Zhou

  • Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates

    Damien A. Fair;Oscar Miranda-Dominguez;Abraham Z. Snyder;Anders Perrone

  • Individual Variability of the System-Level Organization of the Human Brain.

    Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Babatunde Adeyemo;Steven E. Petersen

  • Evaluation of Denoising Strategies to Address Motion-Correlated Artifacts in Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data from the Human Connectome Project.

    Gregory C. Burgess;Sridhar Kandala;Dan Nolan;Timothy O. Laumann

  • Resting state network estimation in individual subjects.

    Carl D. Hacker;Timothy O. Laumann;Nicholas P. Szrama;Antonello Baldassarre

  • Individual-specific features of brain systems identified with resting state functional correlations

    Evan M. Gordon;Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Babatunde Adeyemo;Adrian W. Gilmore

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan M. Gordon
Evan M. Gordon Washington University in St. Louis
Bradley L. Schlaggar
Bradley L. Schlaggar Kennedy Krieger Institute
Steven E. Petersen
Steven E. Petersen Washington University in St. Louis
Steven M. Nelson
Steven M. Nelson Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Nico U.F. Dosenbach
Nico U.F. Dosenbach Washington University in St. Louis
Abraham Z. Snyder
Abraham Z. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis
Caterina Gratton
Caterina Gratton University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jonathan D. Power
Jonathan D. Power Cornell University
Kathleen B. McDermott
Kathleen B. McDermott Washington University in St. Louis
Deanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Timothy O. Laumann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles