World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
34531
World Ranking
4254
National Ranking
1920

Nico U.F. Dosenbach publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico U.F. Dosenbach sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nico U.F. Dosenbach D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico U.F. Dosenbach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nico U.F. Dosenbach is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, emphasizing subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics like Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Neural dynamics and brain function, Mental Health Research Topics, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Neurological disorders and treatments.

Among the recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Nico U.F. Dosenbach are:

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals, 2022, Nature
  • A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex, 2023, Nature
  • Towards Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Shared and unique brain network features predict cognitive, personality, and mental health scores in the ABCD study, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Plasticity and Spontaneous Activity Pulses in Disused Human Brain Circuits, 2020, Neuron

Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Timothy O. Laumann
  • Evan M. Gordon
  • Scott Marek
  • Damien A. Fair
  • Benjamin P. Kay

Nico U.F. Dosenbach regularly publishes in specific venues, with the most frequent publication platforms being:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Communications
  • NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans

    Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Damien A. Fair;Francis M. Miezin;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

    Unknown

  • Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Binyam Nardos;Alexander L. Cohen;Damien A. Fair

  • A dual-networks architecture of top-down control.

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Bradley L. Schlaggar

  • The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

    B.J. Casey;B.J. Casey;Tariq Cannonier;May I. Conley;May I. Conley;Alexandra O. Cohen

  • A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Kristina M. Visscher;Erica D. Palmer;Francis M. Miezin

  • Functional brain networks develop from a "local to distributed" organization

    Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Jonathan D. Power;Nico U. F. Dosenbach

  • The maturing architecture of the brain's default network.

    Damien A. Fair;Alexander L. Cohen;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church

  • Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration

    Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Jessica A. Church;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains

    Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Adrian W. Gilmore;Adrian W. Gilmore;Dillan J. Newbold

  • Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain.

    Timothy O. Laumann;Evan M. Gordon;Babatunde Adeyemo;Abraham Z. Snyder

  • The frontoparietal network: function, electrophysiology, and importance of individual precision mapping

    Unknown

  • Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation

    Caterina Gratton;Timothy O. Laumann;Ashley N. Nielsen;Deanna J. Greene

  • A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity

    Damien A. Fair;Bradley L. Schlaggar;L B A Alexander Cohen;Francis M. Miezin

  • Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI.

    Alexander L. Cohen;Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Francis M. Miezin

  • A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex

    Unknown

  • On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations

    Timothy O. Laumann;Abraham Z. Snyder;Anish Mitra;Evan M. Gordon

  • Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data.

    Damien A. Fair;Joel T. Nigg;Swathi Iyer;Deepti Bathula;Deepti Bathula

  • Role of the anterior insula in task-level control and focal attention

    Steven M. Nelson;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Alexander L. Cohen;Mark E. Wheeler

  • Control networks in paediatric Tourette syndrome show immature and anomalous patterns of functional connectivity

    Jessica A. Church;Damien A. Fair;Nico U. F. Dosenbach;Alexander L. Cohen

  • Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Individual Human Cerebellum

    Scott Marek;Joshua S. Siegel;Evan M. Gordon;Evan M. Gordon;Ryan V. Raut

  • Real-time motion analytics during brain MRI improve data quality and reduce costs

    Nico U.F. Dosenbach;Jonathan M. Koller;Eric A. Earl;Oscar Miranda-Dominguez

  • Individual-specific features of brain systems identified with resting state functional correlations

    Evan M. Gordon;Evan M. Gordon;Timothy O. Laumann;Babatunde Adeyemo;Adrian W. Gilmore

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradley L. Schlaggar
Bradley L. Schlaggar Kennedy Krieger Institute
Steven E. Petersen
Steven E. Petersen Washington University in St. Louis
Evan M. Gordon
Evan M. Gordon Washington University in St. Louis
Steven M. Nelson
Steven M. Nelson Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center
Timothy O. Laumann
Timothy O. Laumann Washington University in St. Louis
Damien A. Fair
Damien A. Fair University of Minnesota
Caterina Gratton
Caterina Gratton University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Abraham Z. Snyder
Abraham Z. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis
Deanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch Washington University in St. Louis
Marcus E. Raichle
Marcus E. Raichle Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is closely connected with a variety of fields that offer excellent online degree and career options. For students interested in mental health support or therapy, pursuing a Master of Social Work can be an efficient route. Several one year msw programs are available online, allowing for quick entry into social work careers.

If you're looking to explore the foundations of human behavior, a psychology degree online can open doors to research roles, HR, therapy, or counseling. The flexibility of online programs makes it easier for students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

Those focused on educational counseling may want to consider the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited), as CACREP accreditation is important for licensure and credibility in counseling professions.

Additionally, a broad array of most affordable online counseling degrees exist for students seeking budget-friendly options to launch or advance their careers in mental health. Exploring these related online degrees can complement neuroscience studies and offer diverse career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Nico U.F. Dosenbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles