World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
7580
World Ranking
17749
National Ranking
429

C. Theo Verrips publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Theo Verrips sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

C. Theo Verrips D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. Theo Verrips sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. Theo Verrips is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans several interconnected fields within the life sciences, demonstrating a focus on areas crucial to understanding and treating infectious diseases and molecular mechanisms.

The primary fields of study for Verrips include Medicine, Immunology and Microbiology, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. These disciplines underscore a multidisciplinary approach to examining biological processes and disease pathology.

Subfields contributing to their research portfolio include Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Virology, and Molecular Biology. These subfields highlight the technical and specialized aspects of their investigations, often involving imaging techniques and the study of viral pathogens at a molecular level.

The main topics found in their work are Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, HIV Research and Treatment, and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research. These topics indicate a strong focus on immune system components and viral infections, with a notable emphasis on antibody-mediated interventions and molecular structures relevant to HIV.

Verrips has published work in the Journal of AIDS and HIV Treatment, contributing to the ongoing dialogue in this specialized publication. Their recent paper is titled Known and New Routes to Neutralize HIV-1 with Camelid Single Chain Antibody Fragments, published in 2022.

  • Known and New Routes to Neutralize HIV-1 with Camelid Single Chain Antibody Fragments, 2022, Journal of AIDS and HIV Treatment

Collaborations with other researchers are part of Verrips's scholarly activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Gerben Ten Hag
  • Ursula Dietrich
  • Harold Marcotte

These collaborations suggest participation in joint research efforts, contributing to a broader scientific community focused on similar themes.

Best Publications

  • Isolation of antigen specific llama VHH antibody fragments and their high level secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Leon G.J Frenken;Richard H.J van der Linden;Pim W.J.J Hermans;J.Wil Bos

  • The role of ammonia metabolism in nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Eelko G. ter Schure;Natal A.W. van Riel;C.Theo Verrips

  • Glycosylation profiling of immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses from human serum

    Manfred Wuhrer;Jord C. Stam;Jord C. Stam;Fleur E. van de Geijn;Carolien A. M. Koeleman

  • Llama-derived single domain antibodies to build multivalent, superpotent and broadened neutralizing anti-viral molecules.

    Anna Hultberg;Nigel J. Temperton;Nigel J. Temperton;Valérie Rosseels;Mireille Koenders

  • Function of Trehalose and Glycogen in Cell Cycle Progression and Cell Viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    H H Silljé;J W Paalman;E G ter Schure;S Q Olsthoorn

  • Pyruvate Decarboxylase Catalyzes Decarboxylation of Branched-Chain 2-Oxo Acids but Is Not Essential for Fusel Alcohol Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Eelko G. ter Schure;Marcel T. Flikweert;Johannes P. van Dijken;Jack T. Pronk

  • Lactococcal Bacteriophage P2 Receptor-Binding Protein Structure Suggests a Common Ancestor Gene with Bacterial and Mammalian Viruses.

    Silvia Spinelli;Aline Desmyter;C Theo Verrips;Hans J W de Haard

  • Introduction of an N-glycosylation site increases secretion of heterologous proteins in yeasts.

    C. M. J. Sagt;B. Kleizen;R. Verwaal;M. D. M. de Jong

  • Glucose Repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Related to the Glucose Concentration Rather Than the Glucose Flux

    Michelle M.C. Meijer;Johannes Boonstra;Arie J. Verkleij;C. Theo Verrips

  • Role of the lipB gene product in the folding of the secreted lipase of Pseudomonas glumae

    Leon G. J. Frenken;Arjan de Groot;Jan Tommassen;C. Theo Verrips

  • CONTRIBUTION OF CUTINASE SERINE 42 SIDE CHAIN TO THE STABILIZATION OF THE OXYANION TRANSITION STATE

    A Nicolas;M Egmond;C.T Verrips;J de Vlieg

  • An accessory gene, lipB, required for the production of active Pseudomonas glumae lipase

    Leon G.J. Frenken;J. Wil Bos;Chris Visser;Wally Müller

  • Llama Antibodies against a Lactococcal Protein Located at the Tip of the Phage Tail Prevent Phage Infection

    Hans J. W. De Haard;Sandra Bezemer;Aat M. Ledeboer;Wally H. Müller

  • Prevention of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy-associated aggregation of nuclear poly(A)-binding protein with a single-domain intracellular antibody

    Peter Verheesen;Anna de Kluijver;Silvana van Koningsbruggen;Marjolein de Brij

  • Improved anti-IgG and HSA affinity ligands: clinical application of VHH antibody technology.

    Rinse Klooster;Bram T.H. Maassen;Jord C. Stam;Pim W. Hermans

  • HXT5 expression is determined by growth rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    René Verwaal;Johannes W. G. Paalman;Astrid Hogenkamp;Arie J. Verkleij

  • Reliable and controllable antibody fragment selections from Camelid non-immune libraries for target validation.

    Peter Verheesen;Andreas Roussis;Hans J. de Haard;Arjan J. Groot

  • A gp41 MPER-specific Llama VHH Requires a Hydrophobic CDR3 for Neutralization but not for Antigen Recognition

    David Lutje Hulsik;Ying-ying Liu;Nika M. Strokappe;Simone Battella

  • Dynamics of Fusarium solani cutinase investigated through structural comparison among different crystal forms of its variants.

    Sonia Longhi;Anne Nicolas;Lucia Creveld;Maarten Egmond

  • Effects of different carbon fluxes on G1 phase duration, cyclin expression, and reserve carbohydrate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    H. H. W. Sillje;E. G. Ter Schure;A. J. M. Rommens;P. G. Huls

Frequent Co-Authors

Arie J. Verkleij
Arie J. Verkleij Utrecht University
Johannes Boonstra
Johannes Boonstra Utrecht University
Robin A. Weiss
Robin A. Weiss University College London
Silvère M. van der Maarel
Silvère M. van der Maarel Leiden University Medical Center
Winfried Weissenhorn
Winfried Weissenhorn Grenoble Alpes University
Nigel J. Temperton
Nigel J. Temperton University of Kent
Lubbert Dijkhuizen
Lubbert Dijkhuizen University of Groningen
Sylvain Moineau
Sylvain Moineau Université Laval
Jan Tommassen
Jan Tommassen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse online degrees and healthcare career pathways in the USA. Many students and professionals are now taking advantage of flexible online programs that offer advanced training in specialized areas. For instance, a 1 year pmhnp program can prepare biology graduates for rewarding roles as Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners.

Those with a nursing background may consider a post masters fnp certification to become Family Nurse Practitioners, expanding their clinical expertise. Alternatively, if nutrition is your passion, enrolling in an online nutritionist degree helps you build a solid foundation for a career in dietetics and wellness.

For registered nurses wanting to advance, there are online rn to bsn programs designed for quick and accessible skill enhancement. These pathways make it easier for biology and biochemistry graduates to transition into essential roles within healthcare, research, and public health.

Best Scientists Citing C. Theo Verrips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles