World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel

Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 83 1431 1358 52 51 170 18940

Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2004. 2 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2004. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1973 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 4
1976 2
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 3
1981 0
1982 2
1983 5
1984 0
1985 4
1986 2
1987 6
1988 6
1989 5
1990 3
1991 7
1992 6
1993 5
1994 9
1995 7
1996 8
1997 6
1998 7
1999 3
2000 7
2001 5
2002 7
2003 4
2004 12
2005 11
2006 5
2007 6
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 7
2012 2
2013 3
2014 3
2015 2
2016 4
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 3
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
Total 207
Download as CSV

Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 170 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110 83
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a total of 12 publications in this broad field. Within this, they have concentrated efforts in several subfields including Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, mainly centered around plant and fungal biology. Key topics include:

  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research
  • Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy

Recent publications by Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel illustrate ongoing contributions to the study of fungal and plant interactions as well as host-pathogen dynamics. Selected papers include:

  • Enhanced surface colonisation and competition during bacterial adaptation to a fungus, 2024, Nature Communications
  • Identification of SclB, a Zn(II)2Cys6 transcription factor involved in sclerotium formation in Aspergillus niger, 2020, Fungal Genetics and Biology
  • Latex Metabolome of Euphorbia Species: Geographical and Inter-Species Variation and its Proposed Role in Plant Defense against Herbivores and Pathogens, 2021, Journal of Chemical Ecology
  • Stimulating the autophagic-lysosomal axis enhances host defense against fungal infection in a zebrafish model of invasive Aspergillosis, 2022, Autophagy
  • HPTLC-Based Chemical Profiling: An Approach to Monitor Plant Metabolic Expansion Caused by Fungal Endophytes, 2021, Metabolites

The researcher frequently collaborates with a core group of co-authors, which includes Mark Arentshorst, Arthur F. J. Ram, Luis Francisco Salomé-Abarca, Peter G. L. Klinkhamer, and Young Hae Choi. This network reflects a multidisciplinary approach combining molecular biology, plant science, and microbiology.

Publications by Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel have appeared in several scientific venues, predominantly in journals specializing in molecular biology, fungal genetics, and chemical ecology. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Autophagy
  • Fungal Genetics and Biology
  • Journal of Chemical Ecology

Best Publications

  • Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88

    Herman J. Pel;Johannes H. De Winde;Johannes H. De Winde;David B. Archer;Paul S. Dyer

  • Transformation of Aspergillus based on the hygromycin B resistance marker from Escherichia coli.

    P. J. Punt;R. P. Oliver;M. A. Dingemanse;P. H. Pouwels

  • Agrobacterium -mediated transformation as a tool for functional genomics in fungi

    Caroline B. Michielse;Paul J. J. Hooykaas;Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel;Arthur F. J. Ram

  • Filamentous fungi as cell factories for heterologous protein production

    Peter J Punt;Nick van Biezen;Ana Conesa;Alwin Albers

  • Functional elements in the promoter region of the Aspergillus nidulans gpdA gene encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

    Peter J. Punt;Maria A. Dingemanse;Anneke Kuyvenhoven;Ronald D.M. Soede

  • Novel aspects of tomato root colonization and infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici revealed by confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis using the green fluorescent protein as a marker

    Anastasia L. Lagopodi;Arthur F. J. Ram;Gerda E. M. Lamers;Peter J. Punt

  • Highly efficient gene targeting in the Aspergillus niger kusA mutant.

    Vera Meyer;Mark Arentshorst;Aymen El-Ghezal;Ann-Christin Drews

  • Cloning, characterization and overexpression of the phytase-encoding gene (phyA) of Aspergillus niger

    Wim van Hartingsveldt;Cora M.J. van Zeijl;G.Marian Harteveld;Robin J. Gouka

  • Fungal Gene Expression on Demand: an Inducible, Tunable, and Metabolism-Independent Expression System for Aspergillus niger

    Vera Meyer;Franziska Wanka;Janneke van Gent;Mark Arentshorst

  • Fungal peroxidases: molecular aspects and applications.

    Ana Conesa;Peter J. Punt;Cees A.M.J.J. van den Hondel

  • Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus awamori

    Caroline B Michielse;Paul J J Hooykaas;Cees A M J J van den Hondel;Arthur F J Ram

  • Transformation of Penicillium chrysogenum using dominant selection markers and expression of an Escherichia coli lacZ fusion gene.

    Margareta Kolar;Peter J. Punt;Cees A.M.J.J. van den Hondel;Helmut Schwab

  • Expression of the Escherichia coli β-glucuronidase gene in industrial and phytopathogenic filamentous fungi

    I. N. Roberts;R. P. Oliver;P. J. Punt;C. A. M. J. J. van den Hondel

  • The production of antibody fragments and antibody fusion proteins by yeasts and filamentous fungi.

    Vivi Joosten;Christien Lokman;Cees Amjj van den Hondel;Peter J Punt

  • Isolation and characterization of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene of Aspergillus nidulans

    Peter J. Punt;Maria A. Dingemanse;Brigit J.M. Jacobs-Meijsing;Peter H. Pouwels

  • Genomic analysis of the secretion stress response in the enzyme-producing cell factory Aspergillus niger

    Thomas Guillemette;Thomas Guillemette;Noël N M E van Peij;Theo Goosen;Karin Lanthaler

  • The development of a homologous transformation system for Aspergillus oryzae based on the nitrate assimilation pathway: A convenient and general selection system for filamentous fungal transformation

    Shiela E. Unkles;Edward I. Campbell;Yolanda M. J. T. de Ruiter-Jacobs;Martien Broekhuijsen

  • The cell wall stress response in Aspergillus niger involves increased expression of the glutamine : fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase-encoding gene (gfaA) and increased deposition of chitin in the cell wall

    Arthur F. J. Ram;Mark Arentshorst;Robbert A. Damveld;Patricia A. vanKuyk

  • Expression of the Pycnoporus cinnabarinus laccase gene in Aspergillus niger and characterization of the recombinant enzyme

    Eric Record;Peter J. Punt;Mohamed Chamkha;Marc Labat

  • Secretion of heterologous proteins by Aspergillus niger: production of active human interleukin-6 in a protease-deficient mutant by KEX2-like processing of a glucoamylase-hIL6 fusion protein.

    M.P. Broekhuijsen;I.E. Mattern;R. Contreras;J.R. Kinghorn

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur F. J. Ram
Arthur F. J. Ram Leiden University
Peter J. Punt
Peter J. Punt Leiden University
Vera Meyer
Vera Meyer Technical University of Berlin
Frans M. Klis
Frans M. Klis University of Amsterdam
Young Hae Choi
Young Hae Choi Leiden University
Peter H. Pouwels
Peter H. Pouwels Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Roland Contreras
Roland Contreras Ghent University
Ana Conesa
Ana Conesa University of Florida
Eric Record
Eric Record INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Kristian Fog Nielsen
Kristian Fog Nielsen Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Genetics opens the door to a variety of online programs and career options in the broader healthcare field. Many students interested in Genetics also explore nursing roles and advanced practice careers due to overlapping skills and career flexibility.

If you are considering expanding your career options, there are several affordable online pathways to consider. For example, becoming a nurse practitioner is a popular choice, and you can find affordable online fnp programs designed for those who want to advance in patient care roles.

The cost of online education is a common concern, but resources like how much is online nursing school can guide you in comparing tuition and fees. For those pursuing top nursing credentials, you might also look at the cheapest online dnp programs, which prepare graduates for the highest levels of clinical practice.

Additionally, registered nurses wishing to advance can search for cheap rn to bsn programs to obtain their bachelor's degree efficiently and affordably. By exploring these related online degrees, students in Genetics can expand their professional possibilities in the growing healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Cees A. M. J. J. van den Hondel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles