World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timo Mäntylä

Timo Mäntylä

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10960 10257 116 106 83 3887

Timo Mäntylä publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timo Mäntylä between 1983 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timo Mäntylä published across 42 years, from 1983 to 2024, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2009. 4 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2009. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications
1983 2024

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timo Mäntylä: publications per year, 1983 to 2024
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 1
1996 3
1997 4
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 7
2010 3
2011 2
2012 2
2013 4
2014 1
2015 4
2016 4
2017 5
2018 3
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
Total 86
Download as CSV

Timo Mäntylä publications per year - data summary

  • Timo Mäntylä, a Psychology scholar from Stockholm University, has 86 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1983 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1983 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 7 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1984, 1987, 1992, 1995 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 42 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1986, 1989, 1991 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.5 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 10 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1983-1996: 20 publications (1.4 per year); 1997-2010: 29 publications (2.1 per year); 2011-2024: 37 publications (2.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Timo Mäntylä publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Mäntylä sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Timo Mäntylä publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Timo Mäntylä, a Psychology scholar from Stockholm University, records 83 publications - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Timo Mäntylä, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Timo Mäntylä ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Timo Mäntylä D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Mäntylä sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Timo Mäntylä D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Timo Mäntylä, a Psychology scholar from Stockholm University, records 32 D-Index - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Timo Mäntylä, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Timo Mäntylä ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Timo Mäntylä is affiliated with Stockholm University in Sweden, focusing primarily on psychology. Their research contributions span several interconnected fields and subfields of psychological science.

The main field of study for Mäntylä is psychology, with notable work in subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, speech and hearing, and psychiatry and mental health. The range of topics they have explored encompasses cognitive functions and memory, neural and behavioral psychology studies, urban green space and health, noise effects and management, dementia and cognitive impairment research, age of information optimization, and personal information management and user behavior.

Mäntylä has published in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include the Journal of Environmental Psychology, Psychology and Aging, Cognitive Science, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, and the Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Mäntylä cover diverse topics and are listed below:

  • Into the wild or into the library? Perceived restorativeness of natural and built environments, 2023, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Decision-making competence in older adults: A rosy view from a longitudinal investigation., 2020, Psychology and Aging
  • External Time Monitoring in Time-Based Prospective Memory: An Integrative Framework, 2022, Cognitive Science
  • Spatial ability contributes to memory for delayed intentions, 2020, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Intention framing in time-based prospective memory., 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Mäntylä has collaborated with multiple researchers, with frequent coauthors including Fabio Del Missier, Marta Stragà, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Veit Kubik, and Andrew M. Parker. These collaborations have contributed to a multidisciplinary approach within the field.

Best Publications

  • Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities

    Fabio Del Missier;Timo Mäntylä;Timo Mäntylä;Waendi Bruine De Bruin

  • Orientation in buildings: effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids

    Tommy Gärling;Erik Lindberg;Timo Mäntylä

  • Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach

    Fabio Del Missier;Timo Mäntylä;Wändi Bruine de Bruin

  • Time monitoring and executive functioning in children and adults

    Timo Mäntylä;Maria Grazia Carelli;Helen Forman

  • Knowing but not remembering: adult age differences in recollective experience.

    Timo Mäntylä

  • The optimization of episodic remembering in old age.

    Lars Bäckman;Timo Mäntylä;Agneta Herlitz

  • The multifold relationship between memory and decision making: an individual-differences study.

    Fabio Del Missier;Timo Mäntylä;Patrik Hansson;Wändi Bruine de Bruin

  • Executive control functions in simulated driving

    Timo Mäntylä;Martin J. Karlsson;Markus Marklund

  • Gender Differences in Multitasking Reflect Spatial Ability

    Unknown

  • Predictors of time-based prospective memory in children.

    Rachael J. Mackinlay;Matthias Kliegel;Timo Mantyla

  • Decision Making in Adults With ADHD

    Timo Mäntylä;Johanna Still;Stina Gullberg;Fabio Del Missier

  • Priming effects in prospective memory.

    Timo Mäntyla

  • Remembering to remember: adult age differences in prospective memory.

    Timo Mäntylä

  • Recollections of faces: remembering differences and knowing similarities.

    Timo Mäntylä

  • Remembering to remember in adulthood: A population-based study on aging and prospective memory

    Timo MÄNtylÄ;Lars Göran Nilsson

  • Assessing absentmindedness: prospective memory complaint and impairment in middle-aged adults.

    Timo Mäntylä

  • Are my cues better than your cues?| Uniqueness and reconstruction as prerequisites for optimal recall of verbal materials

    Timo MÄntylÄ;LARS-GÖran Nilsson

  • Cue distinctiveness and forgetting: Effectiveness of self-generated retrieval cues in delayed recall.

    Timo Mäntylä;Lars-Göran Nilsson

  • Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease

    Beata Lipinska;Lars Bäckman;Timo Mäntylä;Matti Viitanen

  • Prior Knowledge and Face Recognition in a Community-Based Sample of Healthy, Very Old Adults

    Åke Wahlin;Lars Bäckman;Timo Mäntylä;Agneta Herlitz

  • Aging and memory for expected and unexpected objects in real-world settings.

    Timo Mäntylä;Lars Bäckman

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars-Göran Nilsson
Lars-Göran Nilsson Stockholm University
Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Wändi Bruine de Bruin University of Southern California
Andrew M. Parker
Andrew M. Parker RAND Corporation
Lars Bäckman
Lars Bäckman Karolinska Institute
Michael Rönnlund
Michael Rönnlund Umeå University
Matti Viitanen
Matti Viitanen University of Turku
Agneta Herlitz
Agneta Herlitz Karolinska Institute
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Åke Wahlin
Åke Wahlin Jönköping University
John M. Gardiner
John M. Gardiner University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and career paths. Many students consider licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) to work in clinical, school, or private practice settings. However, LPC requirements differ widely by state.

For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a counselor in Vermont, you can review the Vermont licensed professional counselor requirements to understand the education, supervision, and examination steps involved. Conversely, those looking to practice in Virginia should consult the lpc license requirements in Virginia for differences in state regulations.

If you’re planning to work on the West Coast, it's important to know how to get an lpc license in Washington. Similarly, prospective professionals in Appalachia should explore how to get an lpc license in West Virginia.

Understanding these state-specific pathways is vital for anyone considering an online Psychology degree and a counseling career. Thorough research ensures you meet all educational and credentialing requirements for your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Timo Mäntylä

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles