World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
9336
World Ranking
7103
National Ranking
3078

Pamela DeRosse publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela DeRosse sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Pamela DeRosse D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela DeRosse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pamela DeRosse is affiliated with Northwell Health in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main research topics explored by Pamela DeRosse include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

DeRosse has published multiple papers in various scientific venues, with frequent contributions to Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Schizophrenia Bulletin, and Molecular Psychiatry.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Cortical and subcortical neuroanatomical signatures of schizotypy in 3004 individuals assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Social Cognitive Networks and Social Cognitive Performance Across Individuals With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Healthy Control Participants, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Overlapping Neurobiological Substrates for Early-Life Stress and Resilience to Psychosis, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Identifying nootropic drug targets via large-scale cognitive GWAS and transcriptomics, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • History of childhood maltreatment is associated with reduced fractional anisotropy of the accumbofrontal 'reward' tract in healthy adults, 2020, Brain Imaging and Behavior

Frequent coauthors in DeRosse's collaborations include Anil K. Malhotra, Aristotle N. Voineskos, Igor Nenadić, Tilo Kircher, and Udo Dannlowski. These collaborations represent a diverse network of researchers engaged in related topics within neuroscience and psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence

    Jeanne E Savage;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe

  • Microduplications of 16p11.2 are Associated with Schizophrenia

    Shane E. McCarthy;Vladimir Makarov;George Kirov;Anjene M. Addington

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium

    Joey W Trampush;M L Z Yang;J Yu;E. Knowles

  • White Matter Development in Adolescence: Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Meta-Analytic Results

    Bart D. Peters;Philip R. Szeszko;Joaquim Radua;Toshikazu Ikuta

  • Cognitive and symptomatic predictors of functional disability in schizophrenia.

    Syed Shamsi;Adam Lau;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Katherine E. Burdick;Katherine E. Burdick

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in Patients with Bipolar I Disorder

    Katherine E Burdick;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Barbara A Cornblatt;Barbara A Cornblatt;Barbara A Cornblatt;Richard S Keefe

  • Sex differences in resilience to childhood maltreatment: effects of trauma history on hippocampal volume, general cognition and subclinical psychosis in healthy adults.

    Erin Samplin;Toshikazu Ikuta;Toshikazu Ikuta;Anil K. Malhotra;Philip R. Szeszko

  • Examining the Psychosis Continuum

    Pamela DeRosse;Katherine H. Karlsgodt

  • Age-related differences in white matter tract microstructure are associated with cognitive performance from childhood to adulthood.

    Bart D. Peters;Toshikazu Ikuta;Pamela DeRosse;Majnu John

  • Resting-State fMRI Connectivity Impairment in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Miklos Argyelan;Toshikazu Ikuta;Pamela DeRosse;Pamela DeRosse;Raphael J. Braga;Raphael J. Braga

  • Elucidating the relationship between DISC1, NDEL1 and NDE1 and the risk for schizophrenia: Evidence of epistasis and competitive binding

    Katherine E. Burdick;Atsushi Kamiya;Colin A. Hodgkinson;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz

  • Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS Meta-Analysis Reveals Tissue-Specific Neural Expression and Potential Nootropic Drug Targets

    Max Lam;Joey W. Trampush;Jin Yu;Emma Knowles

  • Dysbindin Genotype and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

    Pamela DeRosse;Birgit Funke;Katherine E. Burdick;Todd Lencz

  • Pleiotropic meta-analysis of cognition, education, and schizophrenia differentiates roles of early neurodevelopmental and adult synaptic pathways

    Max Lam;W. David Hill;Joey W. Trampush;Jin Yu

  • Genome-wide association study implicates NDST3 in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

    Todd Lencz;Saurav Guha;Chunyu Liu;Jeffrey Rosenfeld

  • A voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study of white matter in bipolar disorder.

    Katie Mahon;Jinghui Wu;Anil K Malhotra;Anil K Malhotra;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick

  • DISC1 is associated with prefrontal cortical gray matter and positive symptoms in schizophrenia.

    Philip R. Szeszko;Colin A. Hodgkinson;Delbert G. Robinson;Delbert G. Robinson;Delbert G. Robinson;Pamela DeRosse

  • Relationship among interthalamic adhesion size, thalamic anatomy and neuropsychological functions in healthy volunteers.

    Nishad R Damle;Toshikazu Ikuta;Majnu John;Majnu John;Bart D Peters

  • Further neuroimaging evidence for the deficit subtype of schizophrenia: a cortical connectomics analysis.

    Anne L. Wheeler;Michèle Wessa;Philip R. Szeszko;George Foussias

  • A Schizophrenia Risk Gene, ZNF804A, Influences Neuroanatomical and Neurocognitive Phenotypes

    Todd Lencz;Philip R Szeszko;Philip R Szeszko;Philip R Szeszko;Pamela DeRosse;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick

  • Disrupted in schizophrenia 1 genotype and positive symptoms in schizophrenia.

    Pamela DeRosse;Colin A. Hodgkinson;Todd Lencz;Katherine E. Burdick

  • Genetic Variation in BDNF is Associated with Antipsychotic Treatment Resistance in Patients with Schizophrenia

    Jian-Ping Zhang;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Stephen Geisler;Pamela DeRosse

  • Emotional modulation of response inhibition in stable patients with bipolar I disorder: a comparison with healthy and schizophrenia subjects.

    Chaya B Gopin;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Pamela DeRosse;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine E. Burdick
Katherine E. Burdick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Philip R. Szeszko
Philip R. Szeszko Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nikolaos Smyrnis
Nikolaos Smyrnis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Katherine H. Karlsgodt
Katherine H. Karlsgodt University of California, Los Angeles
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Ingrid Melle
Ingrid Melle University of Oslo
Srdjan Djurovic
Srdjan Djurovic Oslo University Hospital
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki
Raju Kucherlapati
Raju Kucherlapati Harvard University
David Goldman
David Goldman National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a range of online degrees and career pathways can complement or broaden your expertise. Many begin with psychology degrees online, which offer flexible options for learning foundational concepts in brain and behavior.

If you’re looking to pursue clinical work or social services, consider exploring online msw programs. These programs prepare graduates for meaningful careers in mental health, social work, and advocacy.

For those aiming to advance their clinical practice, becoming a licensed psychologist is possible through online psych d programs. These doctorates emphasize applied training for direct patient care.

Another path is through marriage and family therapy. With online lmft program options, students can quickly earn credentials to support individuals, couples, and families.

Together, these degree routes provide flexible and accessible ways to specialize or advance in neuroscience and related helping professions from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela DeRosse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles