World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7103 6540 3077 2773 150 9336

Pamela DeRosse publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pamela DeRosse between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pamela DeRosse published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2018. 2 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2018. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pamela DeRosse: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 6
2009 5
2010 5
2011 3
2012 6
2013 7
2014 11
2015 11
2016 3
2017 14
2018 20
2019 18
2020 15
2021 7
2022 5
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
2026 1
Total 153
Download as CSV

Pamela DeRosse publications per year - data summary

  • Pamela DeRosse, a Neuroscience scholar from Northwell Health, has 153 publications recorded across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2000, 2004, 2005, 2025 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 27 years in the span carry no publications at all (2001, 2002 and 2003).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.4 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 12 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 16 publications (1.8 per year); 2009-2017: 65 publications (7.2 per year); 2018-2026: 72 publications (8.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Pamela DeRosse publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela DeRosse sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 150
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Pamela DeRosse publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Pamela DeRosse, a Neuroscience scholar from Northwell Health, records 150 publications - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Pamela DeRosse, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Pamela DeRosse ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Pamela DeRosse D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela DeRosse sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Pamela DeRosse D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Pamela DeRosse, a Neuroscience scholar from Northwell Health, records 44 D-Index - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Pamela DeRosse, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Pamela DeRosse ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Pamela DeRosse is affiliated with Northwell Health in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, clinical psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main research topics explored by Pamela DeRosse include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

DeRosse has published multiple papers in various scientific venues, with frequent contributions to Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Schizophrenia Bulletin, and Molecular Psychiatry.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Cortical and subcortical neuroanatomical signatures of schizotypy in 3004 individuals assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Social Cognitive Networks and Social Cognitive Performance Across Individuals With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Healthy Control Participants, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Overlapping Neurobiological Substrates for Early-Life Stress and Resilience to Psychosis, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Identifying nootropic drug targets via large-scale cognitive GWAS and transcriptomics, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • History of childhood maltreatment is associated with reduced fractional anisotropy of the accumbofrontal 'reward' tract in healthy adults, 2020, Brain Imaging and Behavior

Frequent coauthors in DeRosse's collaborations include Anil K. Malhotra, Aristotle N. Voineskos, Igor Nenadić, Tilo Kircher, and Udo Dannlowski. These collaborations represent a diverse network of researchers engaged in related topics within neuroscience and psychiatry.

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence

    Jeanne E Savage;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe

  • Microduplications of 16p11.2 are Associated with Schizophrenia

    Shane E. McCarthy;Vladimir Makarov;George Kirov;Anjene M. Addington

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium

    Joey W Trampush;M L Z Yang;J Yu;E. Knowles

  • White Matter Development in Adolescence: Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Meta-Analytic Results

    Bart D. Peters;Philip R. Szeszko;Joaquim Radua;Toshikazu Ikuta

  • Cognitive and symptomatic predictors of functional disability in schizophrenia.

    Syed Shamsi;Adam Lau;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Katherine E. Burdick;Katherine E. Burdick

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in Patients with Bipolar I Disorder

    Katherine E Burdick;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Barbara A Cornblatt;Barbara A Cornblatt;Barbara A Cornblatt;Richard S Keefe

  • Sex differences in resilience to childhood maltreatment: effects of trauma history on hippocampal volume, general cognition and subclinical psychosis in healthy adults.

    Erin Samplin;Toshikazu Ikuta;Toshikazu Ikuta;Anil K. Malhotra;Philip R. Szeszko

  • Examining the Psychosis Continuum

    Pamela DeRosse;Katherine H. Karlsgodt

  • Age-related differences in white matter tract microstructure are associated with cognitive performance from childhood to adulthood.

    Bart D. Peters;Toshikazu Ikuta;Pamela DeRosse;Majnu John

  • Resting-State fMRI Connectivity Impairment in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Miklos Argyelan;Toshikazu Ikuta;Pamela DeRosse;Pamela DeRosse;Raphael J. Braga;Raphael J. Braga

  • Elucidating the relationship between DISC1, NDEL1 and NDE1 and the risk for schizophrenia: Evidence of epistasis and competitive binding

    Katherine E. Burdick;Atsushi Kamiya;Colin A. Hodgkinson;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz

  • Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS Meta-Analysis Reveals Tissue-Specific Neural Expression and Potential Nootropic Drug Targets

    Max Lam;Joey W. Trampush;Jin Yu;Emma Knowles

  • Dysbindin Genotype and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

    Pamela DeRosse;Birgit Funke;Katherine E. Burdick;Todd Lencz

  • Pleiotropic meta-analysis of cognition, education, and schizophrenia differentiates roles of early neurodevelopmental and adult synaptic pathways

    Max Lam;W. David Hill;Joey W. Trampush;Jin Yu

  • Genome-wide association study implicates NDST3 in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

    Todd Lencz;Saurav Guha;Chunyu Liu;Jeffrey Rosenfeld

  • A voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study of white matter in bipolar disorder.

    Katie Mahon;Jinghui Wu;Anil K Malhotra;Anil K Malhotra;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick

  • DISC1 is associated with prefrontal cortical gray matter and positive symptoms in schizophrenia.

    Philip R. Szeszko;Colin A. Hodgkinson;Delbert G. Robinson;Delbert G. Robinson;Delbert G. Robinson;Pamela DeRosse

  • Relationship among interthalamic adhesion size, thalamic anatomy and neuropsychological functions in healthy volunteers.

    Nishad R Damle;Toshikazu Ikuta;Majnu John;Majnu John;Bart D Peters

  • Further neuroimaging evidence for the deficit subtype of schizophrenia: a cortical connectomics analysis.

    Anne L. Wheeler;Michèle Wessa;Philip R. Szeszko;George Foussias

  • A Schizophrenia Risk Gene, ZNF804A, Influences Neuroanatomical and Neurocognitive Phenotypes

    Todd Lencz;Philip R Szeszko;Philip R Szeszko;Philip R Szeszko;Pamela DeRosse;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick

  • Disrupted in schizophrenia 1 genotype and positive symptoms in schizophrenia.

    Pamela DeRosse;Colin A. Hodgkinson;Todd Lencz;Katherine E. Burdick

  • Genetic Variation in BDNF is Associated with Antipsychotic Treatment Resistance in Patients with Schizophrenia

    Jian-Ping Zhang;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Stephen Geisler;Pamela DeRosse

  • Emotional modulation of response inhibition in stable patients with bipolar I disorder: a comparison with healthy and schizophrenia subjects.

    Chaya B Gopin;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Pamela DeRosse;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Anil K. Malhotra
Anil K. Malhotra Hofstra University
Katherine E. Burdick
Katherine E. Burdick Brigham and Women's Hospital
Philip R. Szeszko
Philip R. Szeszko Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Todd Lencz
Todd Lencz Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital
John M. Kane
John M. Kane Zucker Hillside Hospital
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Ingrid Melle
Ingrid Melle University of Oslo
Srdjan Djurovic
Srdjan Djurovic Oslo University Hospital
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a range of online degrees and career pathways can complement or broaden your expertise. Many begin with psychology degrees online, which offer flexible options for learning foundational concepts in brain and behavior.

If you’re looking to pursue clinical work or social services, consider exploring online msw programs. These programs prepare graduates for meaningful careers in mental health, social work, and advocacy.

For those aiming to advance their clinical practice, becoming a licensed psychologist is possible through online psych d programs. These doctorates emphasize applied training for direct patient care.

Another path is through marriage and family therapy. With online lmft program options, students can quickly earn credentials to support individuals, couples, and families.

Together, these degree routes provide flexible and accessible ways to specialize or advance in neuroscience and related helping professions from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela DeRosse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles