World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4406 4076 37 35 132 11441

Hely Tuorila publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hely Tuorila between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hely Tuorila published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1996. 4 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1996. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1980 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hely Tuorila: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 5
1991 4
1992 4
1993 7
1994 5
1995 4
1996 10
1997 6
1998 9
1999 5
2000 7
2001 8
2002 6
2003 10
2004 5
2005 5
2006 3
2007 9
2008 7
2009 6
2010 8
2011 4
2012 8
2013 6
2014 4
2015 7
2016 3
2017 1
2018 2
2019 0
2020 3
2021 1
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Total 188
Download as CSV

Hely Tuorila publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hely Tuorila sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 132
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hely Tuorila D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hely Tuorila sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hely Tuorila is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their research spans across Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Medicine, with specific focus on Food Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Marketing.

Tuorila's scientific contributions cover a wide range of topics including:

  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The scholar has published multiple papers in notable venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Appetite
  • Food Quality and Preference
  • British Journal Of Nutrition
  • Journal of Sensory Studies
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society

Recent publications include:

  • "Food choice drivers at varying income levels in an emerging economy" (2023, Appetite)
  • "Frequent use of selected sugary products associates with thinness, but not overweight during preadolescence: a cross-sectional study" (2020, British Journal Of Nutrition)
  • "An alternative food neophobia scale (FNS-A) to quantify responses to new foods" (2022, Food Quality and Preference)
  • "I find it hard to change poor food habits": Measuring food choice motives in an emerging economy" (2024, Appetite)
  • "Sensory quality control: Assessment of food company employees' knowledge, attitudes, and practices" (2022, Journal of Sensory Studies)

Tuorila collaborates frequently with a cohort of researchers, including:

  • Henriëtte L. de Kock
  • Pulane Nkhabutlane
  • Rosemary Kobue-Lekalake
  • Jeanine Kriek
  • Annelize Steyn

Best Publications

  • Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods.

    K Roininen;L Lähteenmäki;H Tuorila

  • Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods

    Hely Tuorila;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Leena Pohjalainen;Leila Lotti

  • Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims

    Hely Tuorila;Hely Tuorila;Armand V Cardello

  • Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods.

    H. Tuorila;H.L. Meiselman;R. Bell;A.V. Cardello

  • Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods

    Hely Tuorila;Christina Hartmann

  • Validation and cross-national comparison of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis.

    Phillip N Ritchey;Robert A Frank;Ulla-Kaisa Hursti;Hely Tuorila

  • Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: a cross-national validation of the Health and Taste Attitude Scales (HTAS).

    Katariina Roininen;H Tuorila;E H Zandstra;C de Graaf

  • Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: the effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia.

    A. Arvola;L. Lähteenmäki;H. Tuorila

  • The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, body mass index, and responses to sweet and salty fatty foods: a twin study of genetic and environmental associations

    Kaisu Keskitalo;Hely Tuorila;Tim D Spector;Lynn F Cherkas

  • Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance

    Paul Rozin;Hely Tuorila;Hely Tuorila

  • Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales

    Anna Maria Elisabeth Bäckström;Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman;Hely Tuorila

  • Food neophobia shows heritable variation in humans.

    Antti Knaapila;Hely Tuorila;Karri Silventoinen;Kaisu Keskitalo

  • Food neophobia in young adults: genetic architecture and relation to personality, pleasantness and use frequency of foods, and body mass index--a twin study.

    Antti Knaapila;Antti Knaapila;Karri Silventoinen;Ulla Heidi Broms;Ulla Heidi Broms;Richard J Rose

  • Antecedents and consequences of expectations related to fat-free and regular-fat foods.

    Hely Tuorila;Armand V. Cardello;Larry L. Lesher

  • How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread

    Paivi Kähkönen;Hely Tuorila;Hannu Rita

  • Sensory education decreases food neophobia score and encourages trying unfamiliar foods in 8–12-year-old children

    Sari Mustonen;Hely Tuorila

  • Dimensions of novelty: a social representation approach to new foods.

    A. Bäckström;A.-M. Pirttilä-Backman;H. Tuorila

  • Prediction of reported consumption of selected fat-containing foods.

    H. Tuorila;R.M. Pangborn

  • Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods

    Hely M Tuorila;Herbert L Meiselman;Armand V Cardello;Larry L Lesher

  • Selection of milks with varying fat contents and related overall liking, attitudes, norms and intentions.

    Hely Tuorila

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki
Markus Perola
Markus Perola Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Liisa Lähteenmäki
Liisa Lähteenmäki Aarhus University
Karri Silventoinen
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki
Tim D. Spector
Tim D. Spector King's College London
Armand V. Cardello
Armand V. Cardello United States Department of the Army
Richard J. Rose
Richard J. Rose Indiana University
Maija Wessman
Maija Wessman University of Helsinki
Margaret J. Wright
Margaret J. Wright University of Queensland
Antti Uutela
Antti Uutela Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a broad range of rewarding career opportunities, many of which are accessible through flexible online programs. If you’re interested in working directly with individuals and families, pursuing a path as a marriage and family therapist (MFT) is a compelling option. The requirements to enter this field vary by location. For example, you can review how to become a marriage and family therapist in St. Petersburg to get a sense of the licensing and educational steps required.

Those curious about other regions should check the mft requirements in Stockton, as well as the process for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tampa. Each pathway typically involves earning a master’s degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing a licensing exam.

For additional guidance and resources, explore how to become a marriage and family therapist in Toledo. Whether you are considering clinical counseling, therapy, or academic research, an online psychology degree can be a versatile foundation for numerous professional roles in the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Hely Tuorila

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles