World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
10380
World Ranking
4070
National Ranking
219

David H. Gleaves publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Gleaves sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David H. Gleaves D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Gleaves sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David H. Gleaves is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their work primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, marketing, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their main research topics include:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

David H. Gleaves has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Body image disturbance and sexual orientation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, published in Body Image
  • "Comparing Social Stigma of Dissociative Identity Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Depressive Disorders," 2022, published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • "Does Better Media Literacy Protect Against the Desire for Tanned Skin and Propensity for Making Appearance Comparisons?", 2020, published in Social Media + Society
  • "Testing a life history model of psychopathology: A replication and extension," 2020, published in Current Psychology
  • "Stigma Regarding Dissociative Disorders," 2023, published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Their work has appeared frequently in the following publication venues:

  • Body Image
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • Current Psychology
  • Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • Social Media + Society

David H. Gleaves collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Amanda D. Hutchinson
  • Sophie C. Dahlenburg
  • Bennett A. A. Reisinger
  • Phillip S. Kavanagh
  • Bianca L. Kahl

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the Evidence for the Trauma and Fantasy Models of Dissociation

    Constance J. Dalenberg;Bethany L. Brand;David H. Gleaves;Martin J. Dorahy

  • The development and validation of the state and trait food-cravings questionnaires

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H. Gleaves;Tara L. Williams;Stephen A. Erath

  • Comparisons of body image dimensions by race/ethnicity and gender in a university population.

    Katherine J. Miller;David H. Gleaves;Tera G. Hirsch;Bradley A. Green

  • Ethnicity as a protective factor against internalization of a thin ideal and body dissatisfaction.

    Cortney S. Warren;David H. Gleaves;David H. Gleaves;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Maria del Carmen Fernandez

  • The state of betrayal trauma theory: Reply to McNally—Conceptual issues, and future directions

    Jennifer J. Freyd;Anne P. DePrince;David H. Gleaves

  • Development of a simple procedure for assessing body image disturbances.

    Donald A. Williamson;C. J. Davis;Sandra M. Bennett;Anthony J. Goreczny

  • The sociocognitive model of dissociative identity disorder: A reexamination of the evidence.

    David H. Gleaves

  • The Relationship between Social Networking Site Use and the Internalization of a Thin Ideal in Females: A Meta-Analytic Review.

    John Mingoia;Amanda D. Hutchinson;Carlene Wilson;David H. Gleaves

  • The development and validation of Spanish versions of the State and Trait Food Cravings Questionnaires.

    Antonio Cepeda-Benito;David H Gleaves;M.Carmen Fernández;Jaime Vila

  • Body dysmorphic disorder: a review of conceptualizations, assessment, and treatment strategies

    Michelle B Cororve;David H Gleaves

  • An examination of the internal consistency and factor structure of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 in a clinical sample

    Kathleen P. Eberenz;David H. Gleaves

  • Measuring 'Orthorexia': Development of the Eating Habits Questionnaire

    David H. Gleaves;Erin C. Graham;Suman Ambwani

  • Latent structure of Eating disorder symptoms: A factor analytic and taxometric investigation

    Donald A. Williamson;Leslie G. Womble;Monique A.M. Smeets;Richard G. Netemeyer

  • Validation of self-ideal body size discrepancy as a measure of body dissatisfaction

    Donald A. Williamson;David H. Gleaves;Philip C. Watkins;David G. Schlundt

  • Categorical versus dimensional models of eating disorders: An examination of the evidence

    Donald A. Williamson;David H. Gleaves;Tiffany M. Stewart

  • Equivalence of body image disturbances in anorexia and bulimia nervosa.

    Donald A. Williamson;Barbara A. Cubic;David H. Gleaves

  • "Remembering" words not presented in lists: relevance to the current recovered/false memory controversy

    Jennifer J. Freyd;David H. Gleaves

  • The effects of child sexual abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998).

    Stephanie J. Dallam;David H. Gleaves;Antonio Cepeda-Benito;Joyanna L. Silberg

  • Patterns and predictors of mental health service use and mental illness among older and younger adults in the United States.

    Bradley E. Karlin;Michael Duffy;David H. Gleaves

  • The Interview for the Diagnosis of Eating Disorders--IV: Application to DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria.

    Vesna Kutlesic;Donald A. Williamson;David H. Gleaves;Jane M. Barbin

  • Score reliability and factor similarity of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3) among four ethnic groups.

    Cortney S Warren;David H Gleaves;Liya M Rakhkovskaya

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Cepeda-Benito
Antonio Cepeda-Benito University of Vermont
Donald A. Williamson
Donald A. Williamson Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Cortney S. Warren
Cortney S. Warren University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Janet D. Latner
Janet D. Latner University of Hawaii at Manoa
Carlene Wilson
Carlene Wilson Flinders University
David Spiegel
David Spiegel Stanford University
Stephen A. Erath
Stephen A. Erath Auburn University
Michael R. Lowe
Michael R. Lowe Drexel University
Drew A. Anderson
Drew A. Anderson University at Albany, State University of New York
Etzel Cardeña
Etzel Cardeña Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology offers a diverse array of opportunities beyond traditional counseling roles. Exploring paths with advanced degrees can open doors in both clinical and non-clinical fields. If you're wondering about masters in psychology jobs, you'll discover options in healthcare, academia, human resources, and community programs—often blending research and applied work.

Specialized areas like forensic psychology also offer unique roles within the justice system. For those curious about what jobs can you get with a masters in forensic psychology, possible paths include forensic case management, criminal profiling, or working closely with law enforcement.

The field of industrial-organizational psychology focuses on workplace behavior, employee wellbeing, and corporate development strategies. If you want to know what can you do with a masters in io psychology, potential careers include talent assessment, organizational consulting, and leadership training.

Additionally, related disciplines such as sociology are valuable pathways. To learn about jobs with masters in sociology, look into areas like policy analysis, social research, or nonprofit leadership. Each degree offers unique trajectories, preparing graduates for meaningful, impactful roles.

Best Scientists Citing David H. Gleaves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles