World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
14008
World Ranking
3689
National Ranking
2071

Janet D. Latner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet D. Latner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janet D. Latner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet D. Latner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet D. Latner is affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Health Professions, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Social Psychology.

Their main topics of study focus extensively on Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Obesity and Health Practices, and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet. Additional areas of interest include the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education.

Janet D. Latner has authored multiple papers, including:

  • The Relationship Between Children's Problematic Internet-related Behaviors and Psychological Distress During the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study (2021, Journal of Addiction Medicine)
  • Psychological distress and internet-related behaviors between schoolchildren with and without overweight during the COVID-19 outbreak (2021, International Journal of Obesity)
  • Problematic Use of Internet-Related Activities and Perceived Weight Stigma in Schoolchildren: A Longitudinal Study Across Different Epidemic Periods of COVID-19 in China (2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • The Relationship between Weight Stigma, Physical Appearance Concerns, and Enjoyment and Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Associations between social media addiction, psychological distress, and food addiction among Taiwanese university students (2023, Journal of Eating Disorders)

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Chung-Ying Lin (24 publications)
  • Kerry O'Brien (19 publications)
  • Xavier C. C. Fung (9 publications)
  • Nadia Bevan (8 publications)
  • Jung-Sheng Chen (8 publications)

Janet D. Latner's work has been published repeatedly in these venues:

  • Journal of Eating Disorders (5 publications)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (4 publications)
  • Eating Behaviors (4 publications)
  • PsycTESTS Dataset (4 publications)
  • BMC Psychology (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Stigma, Obesity, and the Health of the Nation's Children

    Rebecca M. Puhl;Janet D. Latner

  • Getting worse: the stigmatization of obese children.

    Janet D. Latner;Albert J. Stunkard

  • Understanding Self-directed Stigma : Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale

    Laura E. Durso;Janet D. Latner

  • Stigmatized Students: Age, Sex, and Ethnicity Effects in the Stigmatization of Obesity.

    Janet D. Latner;Albert J. Stunkard;G. Terence Wilson

  • The relationship between weight stigma and eating behavior is explained by weight bias internalization and psychological distress.

    Kerry Steven O'Brien;Janet Latner;Rebecca M Puhl;Lenny R Vartanian

  • Weighing obesity stigma: the relative strength of different forms of bias

    Janet Latner;Kerry O'Brien;L.E. Durso;L.A. Brinkman

  • A multinational examination of weight bias: Predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries

    Rebecca M Puhl;Janet Latner;Kerry Steven O'Brien;Jeorg Luedicke

  • Quality of life impairment associated with body dissatisfaction in a general population sample of women

    Jonathan Mond;Deborah Mitchison;Janet D Latner;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay

  • The effects of a high-carbohydrate, high-protein or balanced lunch upon later food intake and hunger ratings.

    J. D. Latner;M. Schwartz

  • Reducing Anti-Fat Prejudice in Preservice Health Students: A Randomized Trial

    Kerry S. O'Brien;Rebecca M. Puhl;Janet D. Latner;Azeem S. Mir

  • Obesity discrimination: the role of physical appearance, personal ideology, and anti-fat prejudice

    Kerry Steven O'Brien;Kerry Steven O'Brien;Janet Latner;Daria Ebneter;Jackie Hunter

  • Weight bias among professionals treating eating disorders: attitudes about treatment and perceived patient outcomes.

    Rebecca M. Puhl;Janet D. Latner;Kelly M. King;Joerg Luedicke

  • Internalized weight bias in obese patients with binge eating disorder: Associations with eating disturbances and psychological functioning

    Laura E. Durso;Janet D. Latner;Marney A. White;Robin M. Masheb

  • The loss of control over eating scale: Development and psychometric evaluation

    Janet D. Latner;Jonathan M. Mond;Jonathan M. Mond;Mackenzie C. Kelly;Stephen N. Haynes

  • Disgust sensitivity, obesity stigma, and gender: contamination psychology predicts weight bias for women, not men.

    Debra L. Lieberman;Josh M. Tybur;Janet D. Latner

  • Perceived Discrimination Is Associated with Binge Eating in a Community Sample of Non-Overweight, Overweight, and Obese Adults

    Laura E. Durso;Janet D. Latner;Kentaro Hayashi

  • Gastric bypass in a low-income, inner-city population: eating disturbances and weight loss.

    Janet D. Latner;Scott Wetzler;Elliot R. Goodman;Juliet Glinski

  • Childhood obesity stigma: association with television, videogame, and magazine exposure.

    Janet D. Latner;Juliet K. Rosewall;Murray B. Simmonds

  • Weight and health-related quality of life: The moderating role of weight discrimination and internalized weight bias

    Janet D Latner;John P Barile;Laura E Durso;Kerry S O'Brien

  • Loss of control over eating reflects eating disturbances and general psychopathology

    Janet D. Latner;Thomas Hildebrandt;Juliet K. Rosewall;Amy M. Chisholm

  • The diagnostic validity of the criteria for binge eating disorder

    Janet D. Latner;Courtney Clyne

Frequent Co-Authors

Kerry S. O'Brien
Kerry S. O'Brien Monash University
Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania
Rebecca M. Puhl
Rebecca M. Puhl University of Connecticut
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Chung Ying Lin
Chung Ying Lin National Cheng Kung University
Albert J. Stunkard
Albert J. Stunkard University of Pennsylvania
David H. Gleaves
David H. Gleaves University of South Australia
G. Terence Wilson
G. Terence Wilson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Amir H. Pakpour
Amir H. Pakpour Jönköping University
Bryan Rodgers
Bryan Rodgers Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a degree in Psychology, exploring related online programs can greatly expand your career options. Many students seek flexible pathways, and online counseling degrees have become increasingly popular. These programs allow learners to balance studies with personal or professional commitments.

Regional differences matter. For instance, the easiest online counseling degree programs ranking in California highlights schools offering accessible online options on the West Coast. You can also compare programs in other key regions, such as the Florida easiest counseling degrees online.

Some areas within states stand out for their unique offerings. For example, if you are interested in urban programs, the easiest online counseling degree programs ranking in Los Angeles may guide your search. Pennsylvania residents can review the Pennsylvania easiest counseling programs online for local opportunities.

Online psychology and counseling degrees can lead to careers in school counseling, mental health services, human resources, and beyond. Researching regional programs ensures you find an online route best suited to your needs and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Janet D. Latner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles