World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 39 688 688 41 41 157 6641
Psychology 46 6414 5970 373 364 154 8836

Deborah Mitchison publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deborah Mitchison between 2012 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deborah Mitchison published across 14 years, from 2012 to 2025, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2021. 30 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2021. 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 17 publications
2012 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deborah Mitchison: publications per year, 2012 to 2025
Year Publications
2012 2
2013 6
2014 5
2015 3
2016 5
2017 12
2018 15
2019 15
2020 19
2021 29
2022 15
2023 19
2024 13
2025 17
Total 175
Download as CSV

Deborah Mitchison publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Mitchison sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 154
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Deborah Mitchison D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Mitchison sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Deborah Mitchison is a researcher affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their academic work primarily focuses on the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with specific contributions to Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Deborah Mitchison has published research extensively in several academic venues, including:

  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Body Image
  • Nutrients
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity

Frequent co-authors contributing to the breadth of Mitchison's research include Phillipa Hay, Kay Bussey, Stephen Touyz, Nora Trompeter, and Scott Griffiths.

Among Mitchison's recent published papers are:

  • "The hidden burden of eating disorders: an extension of estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019" (2021) in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature" (2022) in Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review" (2023) in Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes" (2020) in BMC Psychiatry
  • "Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research" (2023) in Journal of Eating Disorders

Best Publications

  • The enigma of male eating disorders: a critical review and synthesis

    Stuart B. Murray;Jason M. Nagata;Scott Griffiths;Jerel P. Calzo

  • The hidden burden of eating disorders: an extension of estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Damian F Santomauro;Damian F Santomauro;Damian F Santomauro;Sarah Melen;Deborah Mitchison;Theo Vos

  • The changing demographic profile of eating disorder behaviors in the community

    Deborah Mitchison;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay;Shameran Slewa-Younan;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond

  • Quality of life impairment associated with body dissatisfaction in a general population sample of women

    Jonathan Mond;Deborah Mitchison;Janet D Latner;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay

  • Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life of Eating Disorders, Including Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), in the Australian Population

    Phillipa Hay;Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Abraham Ernesto Lopez Collado;David Alejandro González-Chica

  • Epidemiology of eating disorders, eating disordered behaviour, and body image disturbance in males: a narrative review

    Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond

  • Sex differences in the relationships between body dissatisfaction, quality of life and psychological distress

    Scott Griffiths;Scott Griffiths;Phillipa Hay;Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan M. Mond;Jonathan M. Mond

  • DSM-5 full syndrome, other specified, and unspecified eating disorders in Australian adolescents: prevalence and clinical significance

    Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond;Kay Bussey;Scott Griffiths

  • The epidemiology of eating disorders: genetic, environmental, and societal factors.

    Deborah Mitchison;Phillipa J Hay

  • Me, my selfie, and I: The relationship between editing and posting selfies and body dissatisfaction in men and women

    Alexandra Rhodes Lonergan;Kay Bussey;Jonathan Mond;Olivia Brown

  • Disentangling body image: The relative associations of overvaluation, dissatisfaction, and preoccupation with psychological distress and eating disorder behaviors in male and female adolescents.

    Deborah Mitchison;Phillipa J Hay;Scott Griffiths;Stuart Benjamin Murray

  • Prevalence of obesity and comorbid eating disorder behaviors in South Australia from 1995 to 2015

    F Q da Luz;F Q da Luz;A Sainsbury;H Mannan;S Touyz

  • Time Trends in Population Prevalence of Eating Disorder Behaviors and Their Relationship to Quality of Life

    Deborah Mitchison;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay;Shameran Slewa-Younan;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond

  • Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research

    Unknown

  • The relative importance of dissatisfaction, overvaluation and preoccupation with weight and shape for predicting onset of disordered eating behaviors and depressive symptoms over 15 Years

    Helen Sharpe;Scott Griffiths;Tse Hwei Choo;Marla E. Eisenberg

  • Socioeconomic Correlates of Eating Disorder Symptoms in an Australian Population-Based Sample.

    Brittany Mulders-Jones;Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Federico Girosi;Phillipa Hay

  • Sex differences in health-related quality of life impairment associated with eating disorder features: a general population study

    Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond;Shameran Slewa-Younan;Phillipa Hay;Phillipa Hay

  • The development and validation of the muscularity-oriented eating test: a novel measure of muscularity-oriented disordered eating

    Stuart B. Murray;Tiffany A. Brown;Aaron J. Blashill;Emilio J. Compte;Emilio J. Compte

  • Further development of the 12-item EDE-QS: identifying a cut-off for screening purposes.

    Katarina Prnjak;Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Scott Griffiths;Jonathan Mond;Jonathan Mond

  • A thematic content analysis of #cheatmeal images on social media: Characterizing an emerging dietary trend

    Eva Pila;Eva Pila;Jonathan M. Mond;Scott Griffiths;Deborah Mitchison

  • Predictors of muscularity-oriented disordered eating behaviors in U.S. young adults: A prospective cohort study

    Jason M. Nagata;Stuart B. Murray;Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo;Andrea K. Garber

  • Prognostic communication preferences of migrant patients and their relatives

    D. Mitchison;Phyllis Butow;Ming Sze;Lynley Aldridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Scott Griffiths
Scott Griffiths University of Melbourne
Stuart B. Murray
Stuart B. Murray University of California, Los Angeles
Kay Bussey
Kay Bussey Macquarie University
Stephen Touyz
Stephen Touyz University of Sydney
Aaron J. Blashill
Aaron J. Blashill San Diego State University
Bryan Rodgers
Bryan Rodgers Australian National University
Kathleen M. Pike
Kathleen M. Pike Columbia University
Ian D. Stephen
Ian D. Stephen Bournemouth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of exciting career paths, many of which are now accessible through online degrees. If you are considering an online program, you may wonder is an online psychology degree credible? Increasingly, employers and graduate schools respect accredited online psychology degrees, provided the program meets high academic standards.

When choosing your degree, a common question is should I get a bs or ba in psychology? A BA typically emphasizes broader liberal arts, while a BS usually focuses on science and research. Your decision can influence your career, whether that's in clinical psychology, counseling, or research.

Specialized fields such as behavioral analysis and forensic psychology offer unique opportunities. For those interested in applied behavior analysis, it's helpful to explore behavioral analysis degree salary outlooks and common career paths. Alternatively, if criminal justice and mental health intersect your interests, learn more about what is a forensic psychologist and their role in legal settings.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah Mitchison

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles