World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8595 8029 4583 4174 140 6053

Aaron J. Blashill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aaron J. Blashill between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aaron J. Blashill published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 22 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications
2009 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aaron J. Blashill: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 5
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 16
2015 11
2016 10
2017 10
2018 14
2019 9
2020 14
2021 21
2022 5
2023 9
2024 12
2025 10
Total 162
Download as CSV

Aaron J. Blashill publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron J. Blashill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Aaron J. Blashill D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron J. Blashill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Aaron J. Blashill is affiliated with San Diego State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and medicine, with an emphasis on clinical psychology and social psychology subfields. The scope of their work spans diverse topics including eating disorders and behaviors, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, as well as body image and dysmorphia studies.

The scientist's notable areas of study also include sexuality, behavior, and technology, obesity and health practices, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, and the intersection of obesity, physical activity, and diet. These areas reflect their interdisciplinary approach connecting psychological factors with broader health and social concerns.

Frequent publication venues where Aaron J. Blashill's research appears include:

  • Body Image
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Appetite
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • PLoS ONE

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on health disparities, minority stress, and behaviors related to sexual minority populations, including:

  • "Medical Mistrust and the PrEP Cascade Among Latino Sexual Minority Men" (2020, AIDS and Behavior)
  • "Integrating minority stress theory and the tripartite influence model: A model of eating disordered behavior in sexual minority young adults" (2021, Appetite)
  • "The role of sexual minority stress and community involvement on disordered eating, dysmorphic concerns and appearance- and performance-enhancing drug misuse" (2020, Body Image)
  • "Motivation for Physical Activity among U.S. Adolescents: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective" (2020, Annals of Behavioral Medicine)
  • "Ethnic/racial and gender differences in body image disorders among a diverse sample of sexual minority U.S. adults" (2020, Body Image)

Among their frequent co-authors are Alexandra D. Convertino, Jerel P. Calzo, Manuel Gonzales, John P. Brady, and Patrycja Klimek.

This body of work situates Aaron J. Blashill at the intersection of psychological factors affecting diverse populations, with notable contributions addressing minority stress, body image concerns, and health behavior motivations.

Best Publications

  • The enigma of male eating disorders: a critical review and synthesis

    Stuart B. Murray;Jason M. Nagata;Scott Griffiths;Jerel P. Calzo

  • Gay Stereotypes: The Use of Sexual Orientation as a Cue for Gender-Related Attributes

    Aaron J. Blashill;Kimberly K. Powlishta

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adherence and Depression (CBT-AD) in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes

    Steven A. Safren;Jeffrey S. Gonzalez;Jeffrey S. Gonzalez;Deborah J. Wexler;Christina Psaros

  • Eating Disorders and Disordered Weight and Shape Control Behaviors in Sexual Minority Populations.

    Jerel P. Calzo;Jerel P. Calzo;Aaron J. Blashill;Aaron J. Blashill;Tiffany A. Brown;Russell L. Argenal

  • Gender roles, eating pathology, and body dissatisfaction in men: a meta-analysis.

    Aaron J. Blashill;Aaron J. Blashill

  • Mental Health: A Focus on Stress, Coping, and Mental Illness as it Relates to Treatment Retention, Adherence, and Other Health Outcomes

    Aaron J. Blashill;Aaron J. Blashill;Nicholas Perry;Steven A. Safren;Steven A. Safren

  • The impact of sexual orientation and gender role on evaluations of men.

    Aaron J. Blashill;Kimberly K. Powlishta

  • Body Image Distortions, Weight, and Depression in Adolescent Boys: Longitudinal Trajectories into Adulthood.

    Aaron J. Blashill;Sabine Wilhelm

  • Anabolic steroid use and body image psychopathology in men: Delineating between appearance- versus performance-driven motivations.

    Stuart B. Murray;Scott Griffiths;Jonathan M. Mond;Joseph Kean

  • Psychosocial Syndemics are Additively Associated with Worse ART Adherence in HIV-Infected Individuals

    Aaron J. Blashill;C. Andres Bedoya;Kenneth H. Mayer;Conall O’Cleirigh

  • Elements of male body image: Prediction of depression, eating pathology and social sensitivity among gay men.

    Aaron J. Blashill;Aaron J. Blashill

  • Promoting the Sexual Health of MSM in the Context of Comorbid Mental Health Problems

    Steven A. Safren;Steven A. Safren;Aaron J. Blashill;Aaron J. Blashill;Conall M. O’Cleirigh;Conall M. O’Cleirigh

  • The development and validation of the muscularity-oriented eating test: a novel measure of muscularity-oriented disordered eating

    Stuart B. Murray;Tiffany A. Brown;Aaron J. Blashill;Emilio J. Compte;Emilio J. Compte

  • Thinness and muscularity internalization: Associations with disordered eating and muscle dysmorphia in men.

    Patrycja Klimek;Stuart B. Murray;Tiffany Brown;Manuel Gonzales

  • Sexual Orientation and Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids in US Adolescent Boys

    Aaron J. Blashill;Steven A. Safren

  • Mediation of gender role conflict and eating pathology in gay men.

    Aaron J. Blashill;Jillon S. Vander Wal

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy for body image and self-care (CBT-BISC) in sexual minority men living with HIV: A randomized controlled trial.

    Aaron J. Blashill;Steven A. Safren;Sabine Wilhelm;Jonathan Jampel

  • The Body Dysmorphic Disorder Symptom Scale: Development and preliminary validation of a self-report scale of symptom specific dysfunction.

    Sabine Wilhelm;Jennifer L. Greenberg;Elizabeth Rosenfield;Irina Kasarskis

  • Syndemics and the PrEP Cascade: Results from a Sample of Young Latino Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Aaron J. Blashill;John P. Brady;Benjamin M. Rooney;Carlos E. Rodriguez-Diaz

  • Body Dissatisfaction Among Sexual Minority Men: Psychological and Sexual Health Outcomes

    Aaron J. Blashill;Julia Tomassilli;Katie Biello;Conall O’Cleirigh

  • Prospective health associations of drive for muscularity in young adult males.

    Trine Tetlie Eik‐Nes;Trine Tetlie Eik‐Nes;S. Bryn Austin;Aaron J. Blashill;Aaron J. Blashill;Stuart B. Murray

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven A. Safren
Steven A. Safren University of Miami
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Conall O’Cleirigh
Conall O’Cleirigh Harvard University
Jerel P. Calzo
Jerel P. Calzo San Diego State University
Tiffany A. Brown
Tiffany A. Brown Auburn University
Stuart B. Murray
Stuart B. Murray University of California, Los Angeles
Scott Griffiths
Scott Griffiths University of Melbourne
Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney
Jessica F. Magidson
Jessica F. Magidson University of Maryland, College Park
Jillon S. Vander Wal
Jillon S. Vander Wal Saint Louis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens many online study options and varied career paths. Online psychology programs allow students to learn flexibly, making them ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments. Students can pursue foundational bachelor’s degrees or specialize with master’s or doctoral programs, studying topics like clinical psychology, counseling, or organizational behavior.

When researching programs, consider location and academic reputation. Region-specific rankings, such as the top psychology programs in Conway and top psychology programs in Fairfax, can help identify standout schools. Broader statewide lists—like the best psychology degree programs ranking in Florida and top psychology degrees in Georgia—also provide valuable insights into high-quality online and campus programs.

Earning an online psychology degree can prepare you for jobs in mental health, social services, education, or business settings. Some roles, such as licensed counselor or psychologist, may require further graduate study or certification. Carefully review program accreditation, flexibility, and support services before enrolling to maximize your educational investment and career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron J. Blashill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles