World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
56
Citations
10224
World Ranking
2862
National Ranking
1015

Neil Pederson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Pederson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 178 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Neil Pederson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Pederson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil Pederson is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and is active in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research focuses predominantly on tree-ring climate responses, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, and ecology and vegetation dynamics studies.

Among their main topics of work are:

  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research
  • Climate variability and models

Pederson has contributed to subfields including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, nature and landscape conservation, ecology, and artificial intelligence.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Global Change Biology
  • Tree Physiology
  • Nature Communications
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Pederson include:

  • "Carbon budget of the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research site: pattern, process, and response to global change," 2020, Ecological Monographs
  • "Tree height and leaf drought tolerance traits shape growth responses across droughts in a temperate broadleaf forest," 2020, New Phytologist
  • "Joint effects of climate, tree size, and year on annual tree growth derived from tree-ring records of ten globally distributed forests," 2021, Global Change Biology
  • "Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America," 2020, Journal of Climate
  • "Warm springs alter timing but not total growth of temperate deciduous trees," 2022, Nature

Pederson frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Justin T. Maxwell, David A. Orwig, Rubén D. Manzanedo, Tim Rademacher, and Andrew D. Richardson.

Best Publications

  • The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States.

    James S. Clark;Louis Iverson;Christopher W. Woodall;Craig D. Allen

  • Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America

    Ryan W. McEwan;James M. Dyer;Neil Pederson

  • The influence of winter temperatures on the annual radial growth of six northern range margin tree species

    Neil Pederson;Edward R. Cook;Gordon C. Jacoby;Dorothy M. Peteet

  • Is the growth of birch at the upper timberline in the Himalayas limited by moisture or by temperature

    Eryuan Liang;Binod Dawadi;Binod Dawadi;Neil Pederson;Dieter Eckstein

  • Hydrometeorological Reconstructions for Northeastern Mongolia Derived from Tree Rings: 1651–1995*

    Neil Pederson;Gordon Jacoby;Rosanne Dorothy D'Arrigo;Edward R. Cook

  • Drought timing and local climate determine the sensitivity of eastern temperate forests to drought

    Loïc D'Orangeville;Loïc D'Orangeville;Justin Maxwell;Daniel Kneeshaw;Neil Pederson

  • Age, allocation and availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees.

    Mariah S. Carbone;Claudia I. Czimczik;Trevor F. Keenan;Paula F. Murakami

  • Effects of canopy structure on resource availability and seedling responses in a longleaf pine ecosystem

    Brian J. Palik;Robert J. Mitchell;Greg Houseal;Neil Pederson

  • Is an Epic Pluvial Masking the Water Insecurity of the Greater New York City Region

    Neil Pederson;Andrew R. Bell;Edward R. Cook;Upmanu Lall

  • Northeastern North America as a potential refugium for boreal forests in a warming climate

    L. D’Orangeville;L. D’Orangeville;L. Duchesne;D. Houle;D. Kneeshaw

  • The International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) revisited: Data availability and global ecological representativity

    Shoudong Zhao;Neil Pederson;Loïc D'Orangeville;Loïc D'Orangeville;Janneke HilleRisLambers

  • The Legacy of Episodic Climatic Events in Shaping Temperate, Broadleaf Forests

    Neil Pederson;James M. Dyer;Ryan W. McEwan;Amy E. Hessl

  • Drought legacies are dependent on water table depth, wood anatomy and drought timing across the eastern US.

    Steven A. Kannenberg;Steven A. Kannenberg;Justin T. Maxwell;Neil Pederson;Loïc D'Orangeville;Loïc D'Orangeville

  • Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE.

    Ulf Büntgen;Lukas Wacker;J. Diego Galván;Stephanie Arnold

  • Past and future drought in Mongolia

    Amy E. Hessl;Kevin J. Anchukaitis;Casey Jelsema;Benjamin Cook;Benjamin Cook

  • Recent trends in Inner Asian forest dynamics to temperature and precipitation indicate high sensitivity to climate change

    Benjamin Poulter;Neil Pederson;Hongyan Liu;Zaichun Zhu

  • Warm springs alter timing but not total growth of temperate deciduous trees

    Unknown

  • Convergence in drought stress, but a divergence of climatic drivers across a latitudinal gradient in a temperate broadleaf forest

    Dario Martin‐Benito;Dario Martin‐Benito;Neil Pederson;Neil Pederson

  • Spatial Response to Major Volcanic Events in or about AD 536, 934 and 1258: Frost Rings and Other Dendrochronological Evidence from Mongolia and Northern Siberia: Comment on R. B. Stothers, ‘Volcanic Dry Fogs, Climate Cooling, and Plague Pandemics in Europe and the Middle East’ (Climatic Change, 42, 1999)

    Rosanne D'Arrigo;David Frank;Gordon Jacoby;Neil Pederson

  • Relationships between radial growth rates and lifespan within North American tree species

    Bryan Andrew Black;Jim J. Colbert;Neil Pederson

  • Forest tree growth response to hydroclimate variability in the southern Appalachians.

    Katherine J. Elliott;Chelcy Ford Miniat;Neil Pederson;Stephanie H. Laseter

  • Mongolian tree-rings, temperature sensitivity and reconstructions of northern hemisphere temperature.

    Rosanne D'Arrigo;Gordon Jacoby;Neil Pederson;David Frank

  • Overstory mortality and canopy disturbances in longleaf pine ecosystems

    Brian J. Palik;Neil Pederson

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward R. Cook
Edward R. Cook Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Kevin J. Anchukaitis
Kevin J. Anchukaitis University of Arizona
Nicole Davi
Nicole Davi Columbia University
Rosanne D'Arrigo
Rosanne D'Arrigo Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Gordon C. Jacoby
Gordon C. Jacoby Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
David Frank
David Frank University of Arizona
David J. P. Moore
David J. P. Moore University of Arizona
Valerie Trouet
Valerie Trouet University of Arizona
Jeffrey P. Donnelly
Jeffrey P. Donnelly Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
David A. Orwig
David A. Orwig Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often involves a blend of scientific research, analytical skills, and creative problem-solving. Many students supplement their studies with related fields. For example, strengthening data analysis skills through online math degree programs can open doors to ecological modeling or bioinformatics roles.

Creativity also plays a role, especially when communicating scientific findings. Pursuing an online graphic design degree can help students effectively visualize complex ecological data or design educational materials.

For those interested in a broad approach, online interdisciplinary studies admissions and costs are worth considering. Programs like these allow students to combine ecology, policy, communication, and more, while often being budget-friendly.

Career outcomes in these areas vary widely. For instance, those interested in the historical context of environmental change might wonder how much do historians make; earning potential and job prospects are detailed in this overview: how much do historians make.

Blending online education from diverse fields can strengthen your expertise and expand career options, whether you envision a future in research, education, or science communication.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Pederson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles