World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
56
Citations
12055
World Ranking
2829
National Ranking
1001

David J. P. Moore publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. P. Moore sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 206 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David J. P. Moore D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. P. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Botany

Ecosystem, Ecology, Primary production, Carbon cycle and Eddy covariance are his primary areas of study. He studies Ecosystem, focusing on Ecosystem respiration in particular. He works in the field of Ecology, namely Vegetation.

His Primary production research includes elements of Soil water, Biogeochemical cycle, Nitrogen cycle, Global change and Carbon dioxide. His work in Carbon cycle covers topics such as Carbon sequestration which are related to areas like Subalpine forest, Carbon sink, Snowmelt and Snow. The concepts of his Eddy covariance study are interwoven with issues in Hydrology, Growing season and Understory.

His most cited work include:

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. (803 citations)
  • A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield (372 citations)
  • Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada (340 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

David J. P. Moore spends much of his time researching Atmospheric sciences, Ecosystem, Ecology, Biogeosciences and Carbon cycle. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Atmospheric sciences, Climate change and Productivity is strongly linked to Vegetation. His research on Ecosystem often connects related areas such as Climatology.

His study in Disturbance extends to Ecology with its themes. As part of the same scientific family, David J. P. Moore usually focuses on Carbon cycle, concentrating on Subalpine forest and intersecting with Snowmelt. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Biosphere and Physical geography.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (25.44%)
  • Ecosystem (26.04%)
  • Ecology (25.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Atmospheric sciences (25.44%)
  • Ecosystem (26.04%)
  • Biogeosciences (15.98%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Atmospheric sciences, Ecosystem, Biogeosciences, Carbon cycle and Vegetation. His Atmospheric sciences research incorporates themes from Carbon uptake, Eddy covariance, Carbon sink and Arid ecosystems. David J. P. Moore interconnects Productivity, Climatology, Hydrology and Canopy in the investigation of issues within Ecosystem.

His Carbon cycle research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Terrestrial ecosystem and Data assimilation. His Vegetation study also includes

  • Evapotranspiration which is related to area like Soil science, Leaf area index, Spatial heterogeneity and Transpiration,
  • Remote sensing which is related to area like Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Global change is a primary field of his research addressed under Ecology.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • When tree rings go global: Challenges and opportunities for retro- and prospective insight (55 citations)
  • Chlorophyll Fluorescence Better Captures Seasonal and Interannual Gross Primary Productivity Dynamics Across Dryland Ecosystems of Southwestern North America (55 citations)
  • Remote sensing of dryland ecosystem structure and function: Progress, challenges, and opportunities (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Botany

David J. P. Moore mostly deals with Atmospheric sciences, Vegetation, Carbon cycle, Ecosystem and Remote sensing. His work carried out in the field of Atmospheric sciences brings together such families of science as Productivity and Carbon sink. His research in Vegetation focuses on subjects like Climate change, which are connected to Teleconnection, Physical geography and Forcing.

His Carbon cycle research incorporates elements of Photosynthesis, Canopy and Drought recovery. His study connects Oceanography and Ecosystem. His study focuses on the intersection of Remote sensing and fields such as Data assimilation with connections in the field of Carbon uptake.

Best Publications

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

    Richard J. Norby;Evan H. DeLucia;Birgit Gielen;Carlo Calfapietra

  • A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield

    Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Phillip A. Davey;Carl J. Bernacchi;Orla C. Dermody

  • Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2

    Anthony P. Walker;Martin G. De Kauwe;Ana Bastos;Soumaya Belmecheri

  • Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada

    Jeffrey A. Hicke;Craig D. Allen;Ankur R. Desai;Michael C. Dietze

  • Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long‐term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2

    John E. Drake;Anne Gallet-Budynek;Anne Gallet-Budynek;Kirsten S. Hofmockel;Emily S. Bernhardt

  • Longer growing seasons lead to less carbon sequestration by a subalpine forest

    Jia Hu;David J. P. Moore;Sean P. Burns;Sean P. Burns;Russell K. Monson;Russell K. Monson

  • Remote sensing of dryland ecosystem structure and function: Progress, challenges, and opportunities

    William K. Smith;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Dong Yan;Stephanie Herrmann

  • The AmeriFlux network: A coalition of the willing

    K.A. Novick;J.A. Biederman;A.R. Desai;M.E. Litvak

  • PROGRESSIVE NITROGEN LIMITATION OF ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES UNDER ELEVATED CO2 IN A WARM-TEMPERATE FOREST

    Adrien C. Finzi;David J.P. Moore;Evan H. DeLucia;John Lichter

  • Using phenocams to monitor our changing Earth: toward a global phenocam network

    Tim B Brown;Kevin R Hultine;Heidi Steltzer;Ellen G Denny

  • Spatial and temporal variation in respiration in a young ponderosa pine forest during a summer drought

    B. E. Law;F. M. Kelliher;D. D. Baldocchi;P. M. Anthoni

  • Organic solute accumulation in osmotically stressed cyanobacteria

    R.H. Reed;L.J. Borowitzka;M.A. Mackay;J.A. Chudek

  • Linking drought legacy effects across scales: From leaves to tree rings to ecosystems

    Steven A. Kannenberg;Kimberly A. Novick;M. Ross Alexander;Justin T. Maxwell;Justin T. Maxwell

  • Climatic versus biotic constraints on carbon and water fluxes in seasonally drought‐affected ponderosa pine ecosystems

    Paul A. Schwarz;B. E. Law;M. Williams;J. Irvine

  • Growth rates, salt tolerance and water use characteristics of native and invasive riparian plants from the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico

    Edward Glenn;Rene Tanner;Shelby Mendez;Tamra Kehret

  • When tree rings go global: Challenges and opportunities for retro- and prospective insight

    Flurin Babst;Flurin Babst;Paul Bodesheim;Noah Charney;Andrew D. Friend

  • Estimating parameters of a forest ecosystem C model with measurements of stocks and fluxes as joint constraints

    Andrew D. Richardson;Mathew Williams;David Y. Hollinger;David J. P. Moore

  • A tree-ring perspective on the terrestrial carbon cycle

    Flurin Babst;M. Ross Alexander;Paul Szejner;Olivier Bouriaud

  • Age-related changes in ecosystem structure and function and effects on water and carbon exchange in ponderosa pine.

    J. Irvine;B. E. Law;M. R. Kurpius;P. M. Anthoni

  • Cultivation of Gracilaria parvispora (Rhodophyta) in shrimp-farm effluent ditches and floating cages in Hawaii: a two-phase polyculture system

    Stephen G Nelson;Edward P Glenn;Jeff Conn;David Moore

  • Isoprene emission from terrestrial ecosystems in response to global change: minding the gap between models and observations.

    Russell K Monson;Russell K Monson;Nicole Trahan;Nicole Trahan;Todd N Rosenstiel;Todd N Rosenstiel;Patrick Veres;Patrick Veres

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell K. Monson
Russell K. Monson University of Colorado Boulder
Tristan Quaife
Tristan Quaife University of Reading
Russell L. Scott
Russell L. Scott Agricultural Research Service
Michael C. Dietze
Michael C. Dietze Boston University
Valerie Trouet
Valerie Trouet University of Arizona
Sean P. Burns
Sean P. Burns University of Colorado Boulder
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Edward P. Glenn
Edward P. Glenn University of Arizona
Joel A. Biederman
Joel A. Biederman United States Department of Agriculture
Flurin Babst
Flurin Babst University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Ecology and Evolution opens up numerous interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students find value in exploring fields that complement their core studies, such as environmental policy, data analysis, or science communication. Online degree programs provide flexible options for those looking to broaden their expertise and enhance employability.

If you are interested in creative sciences, a graphic design degree online can equip you with visual communication skills valuable for scientific publishing and education. For those seeking affordability and flexible curricula, the most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs allow you to combine ecology with other complementary fields.

Some career paths in research or curation may require expertise in history or specialized library science skills. The cheapest online history master's degree can be especially relevant for understanding the historical context of ecological changes, while the cheapest masters in library science may benefit those pursuing data archiving or museum work.

Best Scientists Citing David J. P. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles