World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
5484
World Ranking
8406
National Ranking
2999

Joel A. Biederman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel A. Biederman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Joel A. Biederman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel A. Biederman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joel A. Biederman is affiliated with the United States Department of Agriculture in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a substantial body of work exploring global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and ecology.

The scientist's work encompasses detailed study of plant water relations and carbon dynamics, climate variability and models, and hydrology and watershed management. Additional research topics include cryospheric studies and observations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, fire effects on ecosystems, and the use of remote sensing in agriculture.

Biederman has published extensively in several scientific venues, contributing multiple papers to journals such as Agricultural and Forest Meteorology and Ecohydrology, each with six publications. Other frequent publication outlets include The Science of The Total Environment and Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, with four papers each, and Journal of Hydrology, featuring three papers.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Biederman cover diverse aspects of environmental science and climate effects. These include:

  • Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Exceptional heat and atmospheric dryness amplified losses of primary production during the 2020 U.S. Southwest hot drought, 2022, Global Change Biology
  • Plant responses to changing rainfall frequency and intensity, 2024, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and near-infrared reflectance capture complementary aspects of dryland vegetation productivity dynamics, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Water Availability Impacts on Evapotranspiration Partitioning, 2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Biederman's work. Frequent coauthors include Russell L. Scott, William K. Smith, Fangyue Zhang, Yanbin Hao, and Zhenzhen Zheng.

Best Publications

  • Remote sensing of dryland ecosystem structure and function: Progress, challenges, and opportunities

    William K. Smith;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Dong Yan;Stephanie Herrmann

  • The AmeriFlux network: A coalition of the willing

    K.A. Novick;J.A. Biederman;A.R. Desai;M.E. Litvak

  • Temperature and Wetland Plant Species Effects on Wastewater Treatment and Root Zone Oxidation

    Winthrop C. Allen;Paul B. Hook;Joel A. Biederman;Otto R. Stein

  • The carbon balance pivot point of southwestern U.S. semiarid ecosystems: Insights from the 21st century drought

    Russell L. Scott;Joel A. Biederman;Erik P. Hamerlynck;Greg A. Barron-Gafford

  • CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration across dryland ecosystems of southwestern North America.

    Joel A. Biederman;Russell L. Scott;Tom W. Bell;David R. Bowling

  • Terrestrial carbon balance in a drier world: the effects of water availability in southwestern North America

    Joel A. Biederman;Russell L. Scott;Michael L. Goulden;Rodrigo Vargas

  • Terrestrial N2O emissions and related functional genes under climate change: A global meta-analysis

    Linfeng Li;Linfeng Li;Zhenzhen Zheng;Weijin Wang;Weijin Wang;Joel A. Biederman

  • Five Decades of Observed Daily Precipitation Reveal Longer and More Variable Drought Events Across Much of the Western United States

    Fangyue Zhang;Fangyue Zhang;Joel A. Biederman;Matthew P. Dannenberg;Dong Yan

  • Quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on snow accumulation and ablation in mixed-conifer forests

    P. D. Broxton;A. A. Harpold;J. A. Biederman;P. A. Troch

  • Exceptional heat and atmospheric dryness amplified losses of primary production during the 2020 U.S. Southwest hot drought

    Unknown

  • Chlorophyll Fluorescence Better Captures Seasonal and Interannual Gross Primary Productivity Dynamics Across Dryland Ecosystems of Southwestern North America

    W. K. Smith;J. A. Biederman;Russell L. Scott;D. J. P. Moore

  • Changes in snow accumulation and ablation following the Las Conchas Forest Fire, New Mexico, USA

    Adrian A. Harpold;Adrian A. Harpold;Joel A. Biederman;Katherine Condon;Manuel Merino

  • Recent tree die-off has little effect on streamflow in contrast to expected increases from historical studies

    Joel A. Biederman;Andrew J. Somor;Adrian A. Harpold;Ethan D. Gutmann

  • Partitioning evapotranspiration using long-term carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes

    Russell L. Scott;Joel A. Biederman

  • Improving Snow Water Equivalent Maps With Machine Learning of Snow Survey and Lidar Measurements

    Patrick D. Broxton;Willem J. D. van Leeuwen;Joel A. Biederman

  • Multiscale observations of snow accumulation and peak snowpack following widespread, insect-induced lodgepole pine mortality

    Joel A Biederman;Paul D Brooks;Adrian A Harpold;Adrian A Harpold;David J Gochis

  • Increased evaporation following widespread tree mortality limits streamflow response

    J. A. Biederman;A. A. Harpold;D. J. Gochis;B. E. Ewers

  • Satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and near-infrared reflectance capture complementary aspects of dryland vegetation productivity dynamics

    Unknown

  • Plant responses to changing rainfall frequency and intensity

    Unknown

  • Plant species and temperature effects on the k–C* first-order model for COD removal in batch-loaded SSF wetlands

    Otto R. Stein;Joel A. Biederman;Paul B. Hook;Winthrop C. Allen

  • Understanding the relationship between vegetation greenness and productivity across dryland ecosystems through the integration of PhenoCam, satellite, and eddy covariance data

    D. Yan;R.L. Scott;D.J.P. Moore;J.A. Biederman

  • Minimizing biofilm in the presence of iron oxides and humic substances

    Phillip W. Butterfield;Anne K. Camper;Joel A. Biederman;Alex Martin Bargmeyer

  • The Carbon Balance Pivot Point of Southwestern U.S. Semiarid Ecosystems: Insights From the 21st Century Drought

    R. L. Scott;J. Biederman;G. Barron-Gafford;E. P. Hamerlynck

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell L. Scott
Russell L. Scott Agricultural Research Service
Adrian A. Harpold
Adrian A. Harpold University of Nevada Reno
Paul D. Brooks
Paul D. Brooks University of Utah
David J. P. Moore
David J. P. Moore University of Arizona
Marcy E. Litvak
Marcy E. Litvak University of New Mexico
Thomas Kolb
Thomas Kolb Northern Arizona University
David Gochis
David Gochis National Center for Atmospheric Research
William K. Smith
William K. Smith Wake Forest University
Brent E. Ewers
Brent E. Ewers University of Wyoming
Elise Pendall
Elise Pendall Western Sydney University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Environmental Sciences often explore complementary fields to broaden their career opportunities. For example, earning a sociology bachelor degree online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment. This multidisciplinary approach is crucial for roles in environmental policy and community outreach.

For those pursuing advanced studies, many professionals look into flexible options like an online edd programs no dissertation. These programs accommodate working professionals aiming to develop leadership skills without the exhaustive dissertation requirement, which can be beneficial for educators in environmental fields.

Additionally, an eds to edd bridge program offers a streamlined pathway for educators seeking doctoral credentials, blending practical experience with advanced research tailored to environmental education and administration.

For social workers focusing on environmental justice and community health, exploring fully funded dsw programs online presents a cost-effective way to advance expertise and impact change in vulnerable populations affected by environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Joel A. Biederman

Trending Scientists