World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
4122
World Ranking
9355
National Ranking
694

Tristan Quaife publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tristan Quaife sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 120 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Tristan Quaife D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tristan Quaife sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tristan Quaife is affiliated with the University of Reading in the United Kingdom and focuses their research primarily in environmental science. Their work encompasses several subfields, including global and planetary change, ecology, atmospheric science, environmental engineering, and water science and technology.

Quaife's research covers diverse topics such as plant water relations and carbon dynamics, climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, peatlands and wetlands ecology, remote sensing in agriculture, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and fire effects on ecosystems.

Their recent scholarly publications include:

  • Beyond ecosystem modeling: A roadmap to community cyberinfrastructure for ecological data-model integration (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale (2023, Biogeochemistry)
  • Influence of sun zenith angle on canopy clumping and the resulting impacts on photosynthesis (2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)
  • An Agenda for Land Data Assimilation Priorities: Realizing the Promise of Terrestrial Water, Energy, and Vegetation Observations From Space (2022, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems)
  • The Land Variational Ensemble Data Assimilation Framework: LAVENDAR v1.0.0 (2020, Geoscientific Model Development)

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Quaife include Rebekka Artz, Ewan Pinnington, Natalie Douglas, Toni Viskari, and Michael C. Dietze. These collaborations are indicative of research networks in environmental and earth system sciences.

Quaife's publications appear repeatedly in specific scientific journals, showing a focus on modeling and environmental processes. These venues include Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Geoscientific Model Development, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, and International Journal of Remote Sensing.

Best Publications

  • Can we measure terrestrial photosynthesis from space directly, using spectral reflectance and fluorescence?

    J Grace;C Nichol;M Disney;P Lewis

  • Potential for using remote sensing to estimate carbon fluxes across northern peatlands - A review.

    K. J. Lees;T. Quaife;Rebekka Artz;M. Khomik

  • RAMI4PILPS: An intercomparison of formulations for the partitioning of solar radiation in land surface models

    J.-L. Widlowski;B. Pinty;M. Clerici;Y. Dai

  • An assessment of the MODIS collection 5 leaf area index product for a region of mixed coniferous forest

    MG De Kauwe;MI Disney;Tristan Quaife;P Lewis

  • The REFLEX project: Comparing different algorithms and implementations for the inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against eddy covariance data

    Andrew Fox;Mathew Williams;Andrew D. Richardson;David Cameron

  • Assimilating canopy reflectance data into an ecosystem model with an Ensemble Kalman Filter

    Tristan Quaife;Philip Lewis;Martin De Kauwe;Mathew Williams

  • The impact of alternative trait-scaling hypotheses for the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate (Vcmax) on global gross primary production

    Anthony P. Walker;Anthony P. Walker;Tristan Quaife;Peter M. van Bodegom;Martin G. De Kauwe

  • Reconciling biodiversity and carbon conservation.

    Chris D Thomas;Barbara J Anderson;Atte Moilanen;Felix Eigenbrod

  • Application of Sentinel-2A data for pasture biomass monitoring using a physically based radiative transfer model

    S.M. Punalekar;A. Verhoef;T.L. Quaife;D. Humphries

  • Determinants of woody encroachment and cover in African savannas.

    Aisling P. Devine;Robbie A. McDonald;Tristan Quaife;Ilya M. D. Maclean

  • Terrestrial ecosystems from space: a review of earth observation products for macroecology applications

    Marion Pfeifer;Mathias Disney;Tristan Quaife;Rob Marchant

  • An Earth Observation Land Data Assimilation System (EO-LDAS)

    P. Lewis;J. Gomez-Dans;T. Kaminski;Jeffrey Settle

  • Persistent reduced ecosystem respiration after insect disturbance in high elevation forests

    David J. P. Moore;Nicole A. Trahan;Phil Wilkes;Tristan Quaife

  • Impact of land cover uncertainties on estimates of biospheric carbon fluxes

    T. Quaife;T. Quaife;S. Quegan;M. Disney;M. Disney;P. Lewis;P. Lewis

  • Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale

    Unknown

  • Beyond ecosystem modeling: A roadmap to community cyberinfrastructure for ecological data‐model integration

    Istem Fer;Anthony K. Gardella;Anthony K. Gardella;Alexey N. Shiklomanov;Eleanor E. Campbell

  • Movements of migrating green turtles in relation to AVHRR derived sea surface temperature

    G. C. Hays;M. Dray;T. L. Quaife;T. J. Smyth

  • An Agenda for Land Data Assimilation Priorities: Realizing the Promise of Terrestrial Water, Energy, and Vegetation Observations From Space

    Unknown

  • Underestimation of Global Photosynthesis in Earth System Models Due to Representation of Vegetation Structure

    R. K. Braghiere;T. Quaife;E. Black;L. He

  • Do we (need to) care about canopy radiation schemes in DGVMs? Caveats and potential impacts

    Alexander Loew;P. M. van Bodegom;J.-L. Widlowski;Juliane Otto

  • Emergent climate and CO2 sensitivities of net primary productivity in ecosystem models do not agree with empirical data in temperate forests of eastern North America.

    Christine R. Rollinson;Christine R. Rollinson;Yao Liu;Ann Raiho;David J. P. Moore

  • Temporal Constraints on Linear BRDF Model Parameters

    Tristan Quaife;Philip Lewis

  • Global responses of terrestrial productivity to contemporary climatic oscillations

    F.I Woodward;M.R Lomas;T Quaife

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Lewis
Philip Lewis University College London
Mathias Disney
Mathias Disney University College London
David J. P. Moore
David J. P. Moore University of Arizona
Emily Black
Emily Black University of Reading
Mathew Williams
Mathew Williams University of Edinburgh
Michael C. Dietze
Michael C. Dietze Boston University
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mark R. Lomas
Mark R. Lomas University of Sheffield
Benjamin Poulter
Benjamin Poulter Goddard Space Flight Center
Russell K. Monson
Russell K. Monson University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, often complemented by related online degrees. For instance, professionals interested in policy and administration might explore some of the easiest online MPA programs, which provide foundational knowledge in public administration with flexible study options.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial, making a sociology bachelor degree online an excellent complement. This degree enhances insights into human-environment interactions and prepares students for roles in research and community outreach.

For those aiming to advance into education or leadership roles related to environmental sciences, pursuing an EdD no dissertation can be an attractive option, offering advanced credentials without the traditional research barrier.

Selecting quality programs is essential; many students choose accredited EdS to EdD programs to ensure their education meets strict standards and aids career progression in academic or administrative sectors within environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tristan Quaife

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles