World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
12518
World Ranking
3579
National Ranking
1253

David A. Orwig publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Orwig sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David A. Orwig D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Orwig sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Orwig is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong emphasis on forest ecology and related sub-disciplines.

The scientist's work covers several subfields, including:

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Insect Science
  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Some of the recent publications by David A. Orwig are:

  • "Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission," 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Carbon budget of the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research site: pattern, process, and response to global change," 2020, Ecological Monographs
  • "Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees influence the latitudinal beta-diversity gradient of tree communities in forests worldwide," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Application of multidimensional structural characterization to detect and describe moderate forest disturbance," 2020, Ecosphere
  • "Tree Species Traits Determine the Success of LiDAR-Based Crown Mapping in a Mixed Temperate Forest," 2020, Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David A. Orwig include:

  • Neil Pederson
  • Jonathan A. Myers
  • Gregory S. Gilbert
  • James A. Lutz
  • Xugao Wang

The scientist's work is often published in venues such as:

  • Ecosphere
  • Journal of Forestry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Remote Sensing
  • Ecology

Best Publications

  • Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems

    Aaron M. Ellison;Michael S. Bank;Barton D. Clinton;Elizabeth A. Colburn

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • Forest response to the introduced hemlock woolly adelgid in southern New England, USA.

    David A. Orwig;David R. Foster

  • Global importance of large‐diameter trees

    James A. Lutz;Tucker J. Furniss;Daniel J. Johnson;Stuart J. Davies

  • Landscape patterns of hemlock decline in New England due to the introduced hemlock woolly adelgid

    David A. Orwig;David R. Foster;David L. Mausel

  • Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options.

    Gary M. Lovett;Marissa S. Weiss;Andrew M. Liebhold;Thomas P. Holmes

  • Variation in radial growth responses to drought among species, site, and canopy strata

    David A. Orwig;Marc D. Abrams

  • Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale.

    Joseph A. LaManna;Scott A. Mangan;Alfonso Alonso;Norman A. Bourg;Norman A. Bourg

  • Dendroecological analysis of successional dynamics for a presettlement-origin white-pine-mixed-oak forest in the southern Appalachians, USA.

    Marc D. Abrams;David A. Orwig;Thomas E. Demeo

  • Avian response to removal of a forest dominant: consequences of hemlock woolly adelgid infestations

    Morgan W. Tingley;David A. Orwig;Rebecca Field;Rebecca Field;Glenn Motzkin

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • Direct and indirect ecosystem consequences of an invasive pest on forests dominated by eastern hemlock

    Matthew L. Kizlinski;David A. Orwig;Richard C. Cobb;David R. Foster

  • A 300-year history of disturbance and canopy recruitment for co-occurring white pine and hemlock on the Allegheny Plateau, USA

    Marc D. Abrams;David A. Orwig;David A. Orwig

  • Preemptive and salvage harvesting of New England forests: when doing nothing is a viable alternative.

    David R. Foster;David A. Orwig

  • The Legacy of Episodic Climatic Events in Shaping Temperate, Broadleaf Forests

    Neil Pederson;James M. Dyer;Ryan W. McEwan;Amy E. Hessl

  • Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in New England Forests: Canopy Impacts Transforming Ecosystem Processes and Landscapes

    Bernhard Stadler;Bernhard Stadler;Thomas Müller;David Orwig;Richard Cobb

  • Multi-year ecosystem response to hemlock woolly adelgid infestation in southern New England forests

    David A. OrwigD.A. Orwig;Richard C. CobbR.C. Cobb;Anthony W. D’AmatoA.W. D’Amato;Matthew L. KizlinskiM.L. Kizlinski

  • An invasive urban forest pest invades natural environments — Asian longhorned beetle in northeastern US hardwood forests

    Kevin J. Dodds;David A. Orwig

  • Fine-scale perspectives on landscape phenology from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photography

    Stephen Klosterman;Eli Melaas;Jonathan A. Wang;Arturo Martinez

  • Land-use history (1720–1992), composition, and dynamics of oak–pine forests within the Piedmont and Coastal Plain of northern Virginia

    David A. Orwig;Marc D. Abrams

  • Oak, chestnut and fire: climatic and cultural controls of long‐term forest dynamics in New England, USA

    David R. Foster;Susan Clayden;David A. Orwig;Brian Hall

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Foster
David R. Foster Harvard University
Anthony W. D'Amato
Anthony W. D'Amato University of Vermont
Evan L. Preisser
Evan L. Preisser University of Rhode Island
Aaron M. Ellison
Aaron M. Ellison Harvard University
David Kenfack
David Kenfack Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Fangliang He
Fangliang He University of Alberta
Marc D. Abrams
Marc D. Abrams Pennsylvania State University
James A. Lutz
James A. Lutz Utah State University
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Stuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution can benefit from a range of online degree options that support versatile career paths. Many universities now offer online programs designed to fit the unique needs of modern learners, including those balancing work, family, or military commitments.

When choosing an online program, it’s important to consider format, cost, and accreditation. For example, comparing pathways like capella vs wgu rn to bsn can reveal different approaches to flexible learning and student support. Advancing your education through bridge programs is another option, such as pursuing a bsn to msn online for greater career mobility.

For those seeking high-quality instruction, consider institutions recognized among the nonprofit online colleges. These universities often combine reputable degrees with affordable tuition. Additionally, service members and veterans may explore the best military friendly colleges for programs designed around military life and career transitions. Each pathway offers unique benefits to aspiring ecologists and evolutionary biologists.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Orwig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles