World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
87
Citations
28380
World Ranking
552
National Ranking
198

David R. Foster publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Foster sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 241 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David R. Foster D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Foster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. Foster is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Environmental Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Medicine. Key subfields within their body of work include Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Epidemiology.

Foster's contributions cover a variety of topics related to environmental and ecological processes. These topics include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Burn Injury Management and Outcomes

The researcher's recent publications illustrate a diverse range of interests:

  • Carbon budget of the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research site: pattern, process, and response to global change (2020, Ecological Monographs)
  • Conservation implications of limited Native American impacts in pre-contact New England (2020, Nature Sustainability)
  • A Multicenter Evaluation of Outcomes Following the Use of Nebulized Heparin for Inhalation Injury (HIHI2 Study) (2020, Journal of Burn Care & Research)
  • The Reading Palaeofire Database: an expanded global resource to document changes in fire regimes from sedimentary charcoal records (2022, Earth System Science Data)
  • Cascading effects: insights from the U.S. Long Term Ecological Research Network (2021, Ecosphere)

Foster frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Bryan N. Shuman
  • W. Wyatt Oswald
  • Todd A. Walroth
  • Allyson M McIntire
  • Jonathan R. Thompson

Their work is regularly published in specific academic venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Journal of Burn Care & Research
  • Nature Sustainability
  • Quaternary Research
  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
  • Rhodora

Best Publications

  • Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems

    Aaron M. Ellison;Michael S. Bank;Barton D. Clinton;Elizabeth A. Colburn

  • The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation

    David Foster;Frederick Swanson;John Aber;Ingrid Burke

  • Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA

    David R. Foster

  • The changing landscape : ecosystem responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients

    Nancy B. Grimm;David R. Foster;Peter M. Groffman;J. Morgan Grove

  • Land-Use History as Long-Term Broad-Scale Disturbance: Regional Forest Dynamics in Central New England

    David R. Foster;Glenn Motzkin;Benjamin Slater

  • Changes in Fire Regimes Since the Last Glacial Maximum: An Assessment Based on a Global Synthesis and Analysis of Charcoal Data

    Mitch J. Power;J. Marlon;N. Ortiz;P. J. Bartlein

  • Landscape Patterns and Legacies Resulting from Large, Infrequent Forest Disturbances

    David R. Foster;Dennis H. Knight;Jerry F. Franklin

  • Forest response to the introduced hemlock woolly adelgid in southern New England, USA.

    David A. Orwig;David R. Foster

  • Species and stand response to catastrophic wind in central New England, U.S.A

    David R. Foster

  • Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes

    Emery Robert Boose;David Russell Foster;Marcheterre Fluet

  • Threads of Continuity There are immense differences between even-aged silvicultural disturbances (especially clearcutting) and natural disturbances, such as windthrow, wildfire, and even volcanic eruptions.

    Jerry F. Franklin;David Lindenmayer;James A. MacMahon;Arthur McKee

  • Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England, USA

    David R. Foster;Emery R. Boose

  • Disturbance history, community organization and vegetation dynamics of the old-growth pisgah forest, South-Western New Hampshire, U.S.A

    David R. Foster

  • Landscape patterns of hemlock decline in New England due to the introduced hemlock woolly adelgid

    David A. Orwig;David R. Foster;David L. Mausel

  • Response of forest plant species to land-use change: a life-history trait-based approach

    Kris Verheyen;Olivier Honnay;Glenn Motzkin;Martin Hermy

  • Widespread sampling biases in herbaria revealed from large-scale digitization

    Barnabas H. Daru;Daniel S. Park;Richard B. Primack;Charles G. Willis

  • Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: an assessment of historical land-use effects on rich mesic forests

    Jesse Bellemare;Glenn Motzkin;David R. Foster

  • Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options.

    Gary M. Lovett;Marissa S. Weiss;Andrew M. Liebhold;Thomas P. Holmes

  • Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA

    Brian Hall;Glenn Motzkin;David R. Foster;Mindy Syfert

  • Salvage Harvesting Policies After Natural Disturbance

    D. B. Lindenmayer;D. R. Foster;J. F. Franklin;M. L. Hunter

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn Motzkin
Glenn Motzkin Harvard University
David A. Orwig
David A. Orwig Harvard University
Bryan N. Shuman
Bryan N. Shuman University of Wyoming
Anthony W. D'Amato
Anthony W. D'Amato University of Vermont
Aaron M. Ellison
Aaron M. Ellison Harvard University
John D. Aber
John D. Aber University of New Hampshire
Juzhi Hou
Juzhi Hou Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jerry F. Franklin
Jerry F. Franklin University of Washington
Yongsong Huang
Yongsong Huang Brown University
Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your studies beyond Ecology and Evolution opens up many opportunities in allied fields. Online degree programs can help you build versatile skills and prepare for a wide range of science and health-related careers. For students looking to quickly enhance their qualifications, consider accelerated masters psychology programs, which let you fast-track your graduate studies and enter the job market sooner.

There is also growing demand for counselors and mental health professionals, especially those with ecological and biological insight. If you’re interested in this area, fast track mental health counseling programs can help you qualify for professional roles in a short time.

Combining ecological knowledge with psychology can open up unique career paths. Many graduates may ask, what can I do with a forensic psychology degree? This specialized field blends science and law, offering diverse opportunities in research, policy, and public service.

For those passionate about working with youth, a masters in child psychology can pave the way for impactful work in education, health services, and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Foster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles