World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
75
Citations
17137
World Ranking
1204
National Ranking
623

Mark Mercola publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Mercola sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 223 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Mark Mercola D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Mercola sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Mercola is affiliated with the Cardiovascular Institute of the South in the United States. Their research spans several areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine as well as molecular biology.

The scientist has contributed notably to multiple topics including:

  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • MicroRNA in Disease Regulation

Among recent papers associated with Mark Mercola, the following stand out:

  • "Metabolic Maturation Media Improve Physiological Function of Human iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes," 2020, published in Cell Reports
  • "Phenotypic Drug Discovery: Recent Successes, Lessons Learned and New Directions," 2022, published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
  • "Hyperglycemia Acutely Increases Cytosolic Reactive Oxygen Species via O-linked GlcNAcylation and CaMKII Activation in Mouse Ventricular Myocytes," 2020, published in Circulation Research
  • "Mitochondria-Rich Extracellular Vesicles Rescue Patient-Specific Cardiomyocytes From Doxorubicin Injury," 2021, published in JACC CardioOncology
  • "Repurposing Drugs to Treat Cardiovascular Disease in the Era of Precision Medicine," 2022, published in Nature Reviews Cardiology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Dries Feyen
  • Ricardo Serrano
  • Anna P. Hnatiuk
  • Ioannis Karakikes
  • David Staudt

Mark Mercola has frequently published in leading venues relevant to cardiovascular and biomedical research, including:

  • Circulation
  • Circulation Research
  • WIREs Mechanisms of Disease
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • Wnt antagonism initiates cardiogenesis in Xenopus laevis

    Valerie A. Schneider;Mark Mercola

  • Epicardial FSTL1 reconstitution regenerates the adult mammalian heart

    Ke Wei;Ke Wei;Vahid Serpooshan;Cecilia Hurtado;Cecilia Hurtado;Marta Diez-Cuñado;Marta Diez-Cuñado;Marta Diez-Cuñado

  • Asymmetries in H+/K+-ATPase and cell membrane potentials comprise a very early step in left-right patterning

    Michael Levin;Thorleif Thorlin;Kenneth R. Robinson;Taisaku Nogi

  • Inhibition of miR-25 improves cardiac contractility in the failing heart

    Christine Wahlquist;Dongtak Jeong;Agustin Rojas-Muñoz;Changwon Kho

  • High-throughput screening of tyrosine kinase inhibitor cardiotoxicity with human induced pluripotent stem cells

    Arun Sharma;Paul W. Burridge;Paul W. Burridge;Wesley L. McKeithan;Wesley L. McKeithan;Ricardo Serrano

  • Beta-cell differentiation from nonendocrine epithelial cells of the adult human pancreas

    Ergeng Hao;Björn Tyrberg;Björn Tyrberg;Pamela Itkin-Ansari;Pamela Itkin-Ansari;Jonathan R T Lakey

  • Lentiviral vectors and protocols for creation of stable hESC lines for fluorescent tracking and drug resistance selection of cardiomyocytes.

    Hiroko Kita-Matsuo;Maria Barcova;Natalie Prigozhina;Nathan Salomonis

  • APJ acts as a dual receptor in cardiac hypertrophy

    Maria Cecilia Scimia;Cecilia Hurtado;Saugata Ray;Scott Metzler

  • An inductive role for the endoderm in Xenopus cardiogenesis

    N. Nascone;M. Mercola

  • Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Wnt Pathway Potently Promote Cardiomyocytes From Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Mesoderm

    Erik Willems;Sean Spiering;Herman Davidovics;Marion Lanier

  • Metabolic Maturation Media Improve Physiological Function of Human iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes

    Dries A.M. Feyen;Dries A.M. Feyen;Wesley L. McKeithan;Wesley L. McKeithan;Wesley L. McKeithan;Arne A.N. Bruyneel;Sean Spiering;Sean Spiering

  • Selective expression of PDGF A and its receptor during early mouse embryogenesis.

    Mark Mercola;Chiayeng Wang;James Kelly;Clare Brownlee

  • Fine-Tuning of Drp1/Fis1 Availability by AKAP121/Siah2 Regulates Mitochondrial Adaptation to Hypoxia

    Hyungsoo Kim;Maria C. Scimia;Deepti Wilkinson;Ramon D. Trelles

  • Alternative splicing regulates mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation

    Nathan Salomonis;Christopher R. Schlieve;Laura Pereira;Christine Wahlquist

  • Immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer requires one or more tissue-specific factors

    Mark Mercola;Joan Goverman;Carol Mirell;Kathryn Calame

  • Non-Cardiomyocytes Influence the Electrophysiological Maturation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes During Differentiation

    Changsung Kim;Maryam Majdi;Peng Xia;Karen A. Wei

  • Gap Junctions Are Involved in the Early Generation of Left–Right Asymmetry

    Michael Levin;Mark Mercola

  • Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha-subunit gene (Pdgfra) is deleted in the mouse patch (Ph) mutation

    Dennis A. Stephenson;Mark Mercola;Elizabeth Anderson;Chiayeng Wang

  • Growth factor superfamilies and mammalian embryogenesis.

    Mark Mercola;Charles D. Stiles

  • Left-right asymmetry determination in vertebrates.

    Mark Mercola;Michael Levin

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Levin
Michael Levin Tufts University
Charles D. Stiles
Charles D. Stiles Harvard University
Joseph C. Wu
Joseph C. Wu Stanford University
Shankar Subramaniam
Shankar Subramaniam University of California, San Diego
Marcia I. Dawson
Marcia I. Dawson Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
Ju Chen
Ju Chen University of California, San Diego
Pier Lorenzo Puri
Pier Lorenzo Puri Discovery Institute
Joost P.G. Sluijter
Joost P.G. Sluijter Utrecht University
Roger J. Hajjar
Roger J. Hajjar Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Pieter A. Doevendans
Pieter A. Doevendans Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Molecular Biology, it’s helpful to explore related fields and alternative online career pathways. Many U.S. institutions now offer flexible, accredited online options that allow you to specialize or shift your focus while balancing other commitments.

For veterans, veteran friendly online colleges provide tailored support, transfer credits, and dedicated services for military students seeking science or health degrees. Those interested in healthcare’s social dimensions may look at online msw programs, which build skills in counseling, community outreach, and public health—areas closely tied to applied molecular research.

Rapid advancement is possible through accelerated graduate options. Consider accelerated psychology masters programs for those focused on behavioral science or neuroscience. Alternatively, fast track mental health counseling degrees prepare grads for licensure and clinical roles, complementing a background in biology or genetics with practical skills.

As the demand for interdisciplinary expertise grows, online programs make it easier than ever to connect your Molecular Biology training with diverse and impactful career paths in health, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Mercola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles