World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
24176
World Ranking
12895
National Ranking
265

José Luis de la Pompa publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Luis de la Pompa sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 110 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

José Luis de la Pompa D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Luis de la Pompa sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

José Luis de la Pompa is affiliated with the Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine.

Their work concentrates on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cell Biology, Surgery, and Epidemiology. The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • RNA Research and Splicing

José Luis de la Pompa has contributed to several recent papers, notably published in prominent journals. These include:

  • Clinical Risk Prediction in Patients With Left Ventricular Myocardial Noncompaction, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Association Between Left Ventricular Noncompaction and Vigorous Physical Activity, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Nrg1 Regulates Cardiomyocyte Migration and Cell Cycle in Ventricular Development, 2023, Circulation Research
  • Fibrous Caps in Atherosclerosis Form by Notch-Dependent Mechanisms Common to Arterial Media Development, 2021, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • Adhesion G protein-coupled receptor Gpr126/Adgrg6 is essential for placental development, 2021, Science Advances

Their research has been published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Circulation Research, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Circulation, and Basic Research in Cardiology.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Donal MacGrogan, Marcos Siguero-Álvarez, Belén Prados, Joaquím Grego-Bessa, and Rebeca Piñeiro-Sabarís.

Best Publications

  • Negative Regulation of PKB/Akt-Dependent Cell Survival by the Tumor Suppressor PTEN

    Vuk Stambolic;Vuk Stambolic;Akira Suzuki;Akira Suzuki;José Luis de la Pompa;José Luis de la Pompa

  • Differential requirement for caspase 9 in apoptotic pathways in vivo

    Razqallah Hakem;Razqallah Hakem;Anne Hakem;Anne Hakem;Gordon S Duncan;Gordon S Duncan;Jeffrey T Henderson

  • FADD: Essential for Embryo Development and Signaling from Some, But Not All, Inducers of Apoptosis

    Wen-Chen Yeh;José Luis de la Pompa;Mila E. McCurrach;Hong-Bing Shu

  • Notch promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition during cardiac development and oncogenic transformation

    Luika A. Timmerman;Joaquín Grego-Bessa;Angel Raya;Esther Bertrán

  • A novel source of arterial valve cells linked to bicuspid aortic valve without raphe in mice.

    Lorriane Eley;Ahlam M. S. Alqahtani;Donal MacGrogan;Donal MacGrogan;Rachel V. Richardson

  • High cancer susceptibility and embryonic lethality associated with mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in mice

    Akira Suzuki;José Luis de la Pompa;Vuk Stambolic;Andrew J. Elia

  • Early Lethality, Functional NF-κB Activation, and Increased Sensitivity to TNF-Induced Cell Death in TRAF2-Deficient Mice

    Wen-Chen Yeh;Arda Shahinian;Daniel I Speiser;Janine Kraunus

  • The Tumor Suppressor Gene Brca1 Is Required for Embryonic Cellular Proliferation in the Mouse

    Razqallah Hakem;Razqallah Hakem;José Luis de la Pompa;José Luis de la Pompa;Christian Sirard;Christian Sirard;Rong Mo

  • neurogenin1 Is Essential for the Determination of Neuronal Precursors for Proximal Cranial Sensory Ganglia

    Qiufu Ma;Zhoufeng Chen;Iván del Barco Barrantes;José Luis de la Pompa

  • Conservation of the Notch signalling pathway in mammalian neurogenesis

    J.L. Pompa de la;A. Wakeham;K.M. Correia;E. Samper

  • Role of the NF-ATc transcription factor in morphogenesis of cardiac valves and septum

    José Luis de la Pompa;Luika A. Timmerman;Hiroaki Takimoto;Hiroki Yoshida

  • Notch signaling in development and cancer.

    Victoria Bolós;Joaquín Grego-Bessa;José Luis de la Pompa

  • The tumor suppressor gene Smad4/Dpc4 is required for gastrulation and later for anterior development of the mouse embryo

    Christian Sirard;Christian Sirard;José Luis de la Pompa;José Luis de la Pompa;Andrew Elia;Andrew Elia;Annick Itie;Annick Itie

  • Notch Signaling Is Essential for Ventricular Chamber Development

    Joaquín Grego-Bessa;Luis Luna-Zurita;Gonzalo del Monte;Victoria Bolós

  • Mutations in the NOTCH pathway regulator MIB1 cause left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy

    Guillermo Luxán;Jesús C Casanova;Beatriz Martínez-Poveda;Belén Prados

  • RBPjkappa-dependent Notch function regulates Gata2 and is essential for the formation of intra-embryonic hematopoietic cells.

    Àlex Robert-Moreno;Lluís Espinosa;José Luis de la Pompa;Anna Bigas

  • Partial rescue of Brca1 (5-6) early embryonic lethality by p53 or p21 null mutation.

    R Hakem;J L de la Pompa;J L de la Pompa;A Elia;A Elia;J Potter;J Potter

  • Coordinating tissue interactions: Notch signaling in cardiac development and disease

    José Luis de la Pompa;Jonathan A. Epstein

  • Interaction between Notch signalling and Lunatic fringe during somite boundary formation in the mouse

    Ivén del Barco Barrantes;Andrew J. Elia;Kurt Wünsch;Martin Hrabe De Angelis

  • Localized and transient transcription of Hox genes suggests a link between patterning and the segmentation clock.

    József Zákány;Marie Kmita;Pilar Alarcon;José-Luis de la Pompa;José-Luis de la Pompa

Frequent Co-Authors

Tak W. Mak
Tak W. Mak Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Andrew Wakeham
Andrew Wakeham Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Michel Pucéat
Michel Pucéat Aix-Marseille University
Tak W. Mak
Tak W. Mak Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Andrew E. H. Elia
Andrew E. H. Elia Harvard University
Janet Rossant
Janet Rossant University of Toronto
Rolf Zeller
Rolf Zeller University of Basel
Borja Ibanez
Borja Ibanez Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Bin Zhou
Bin Zhou Chinese Academy of Sciences
Andrew J. Elia
Andrew J. Elia Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up a variety of career paths in healthcare, research, and administration. If you’re looking to advance your career beyond scientific research, many students consider pursuing a cheap online mba healthcare administration program. This option can help you move into management roles in hospitals, labs, or biotech companies, all while balancing convenience and affordability.

For those interested in entering the medical records field, becoming a certified coding specialist (ccs) offers a specialized career path. Understanding the key differences between medical coding certifications is important, as they can impact both job prospects and salaries.

The demand for medical coders continues to grow. If you’re curious about the financial outlook, take a look at typical medical coding salary ranges to better evaluate this path. Wondering if medical billing and coding suits your interests and lifestyle? Learn more about the benefits and challenges at is medical coding a good job.

Best Scientists Citing José Luis de la Pompa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles