World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8019 7485 539 506 103 33944

James Bonta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Bonta between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Bonta published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 2 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 17 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Bonta: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 3
1984 1
1985 3
1986 2
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 5
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 0
2006 4
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 19
2011 5
2012 3
2013 6
2014 2
2015 2
2016 3
2017 4
2018 1
2019 3
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 17
2024 1
2025 1
Total 123
Download as CSV

James Bonta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Bonta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James Bonta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Bonta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James Bonta is affiliated with Public Safety Canada in Canada and engages in research primarily within the social sciences and psychology fields. Their work spans several subfields including sociology and political science, clinical psychology, general health professions, education, and information systems and management.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending
  • Criminal justice and corrections analysis
  • Crime patterns and interventions
  • Health policy implementation science
  • Service-learning and community engagement
  • Interdisciplinary research and collaboration
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology

James Bonta has authored multiple journal articles published across several venues. Recent papers include:

  • Training community supervision officers in the risk-need-responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: a review and implications (2023), Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
  • A system-wide implementation and evaluation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) (2021), Journal of Criminal Justice
  • The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model and Justice-Involved Persons with Serious Mental Illness (2025), Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale

Coauthorship is an element of their scholarly activity, with frequent collaborators including:

  • Seung C. Lee
  • Guy Bourgon
  • Tanya Rugge
  • Chloe I. Pedneault
  • María Cecilia Alvarez Ricalde

The research has appeared in the following publication outlets:

  • Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Criminal Justice
  • BioScience
  • RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
  • Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale

The scientist has contributed studies that engage with the implementation of models in offender rehabilitation, system-wide evaluations in community supervision, and intersections of justice-involved populations and mental health.

Best Publications

  • The Psychology of Criminal Conduct

    D. A. Andrews;James Bonta

  • DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META-ANALYSIS *

    D.A. Andrews;Ivan Zinger;Robert D. Hoge;James Bonta

  • Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology.

    D. A. Andrews;James Bonta;Robert D. Hoge

  • The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment

    D. A. Andrews;James Bonta;J. Stephen Wormith

  • The level of service inventory – revised

    DA Andrews;J Bonta;D Andrews

  • The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders : A meta-analysis

    James Bonta;Moira Law;Karl Hanson

  • The psychology of criminal conduct, 5th ed.

    D. A. Andrews;James Bonta

  • Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice.

    D. A. Andrews;James Bonta

  • The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention?

    D.A. Andrews;James Bonta;J. Stephen Wormith

  • The Psychology of Criminal Conduct

    Unknown

  • Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision

    James Bonta;Tanya Rugge;Terri-Lynne Scott;Guy Bourgon

  • Risk-needs assessment and treatment.

    James Bonta

  • Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use.

    James Bonta

  • A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders

    James Bonta;Julie Blais;Julie Blais;Holly A. Wilson;Holly A. Wilson

  • A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program

    James Bonta;Suzanne Wallace-Capretta;Jennifer Rooney

  • Reexamining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life

    James Bonta;James Bonta;James Bonta;Paul Gendreau

  • An Experimental Demonstration of Training Probation Officers in Evidence-Based Community Supervision:

    James Bonta;Guy Bourgon;Tanya Rugge;Terri-Lynne Scott

  • Predictors of Recidivism among Incarcerated Female Offenders

    James Bonta;Bessie Pang;Suzanne Wallace-Capretta

  • The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR scale.

    James Bonta;William G. Harman;Robert G. Hann;Robert B. Cormier

  • Reductions in risk based on time offense-free in the community: Once a sexual offender, not always a sexual offender.

    R. Karl Hanson;Andrew J. R. Harris;Elizabeth Letourneau;L. Maaike Helmus

  • Intensive rehabilitation supervision: The next generation in community corrections?

    Paul Gendreau;Francis T. Cullen;James Bonta

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Gendreau
Paul Gendreau University of New Brunswick
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding online programs and exciting careers. One popular pathway is in substance abuse counseling, a field in high demand nationwide. As you consider your next steps, it's important to know that the precise education and certification requirements can differ by state and even by city.

For example, the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Newark includes obtaining a relevant degree, supervised experience, and state credentials. Similarly, you should understand the specific substance abuse counselor requirements in Norfolk to ensure you meet local guidelines.

Each city may have unique expectations. Learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in North Las Vegas or how to become a substance abuse counselor in Oakland further highlights the importance of tailored research and suitable degree selection.

By choosing the right online psychology program, you can prepare for certification while enjoying flexible study options that fit your life. These specialized pathways make a profound impact on individual lives and entire communities.

Best Scientists Citing James Bonta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles