World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
8074
World Ranking
6704
National Ranking
2391

William L. Miller publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

William L. Miller D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

William L. Miller is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with an emphasis on water quality and marine ecosystems.

They have contributed to several recent publications in the fields of photochemical processes in natural waters and oceanographic studies. Notable papers include:

  • Simple Method to Determine the Apparent Quantum Yield Matrix of CDOM Photobleaching in Natural Waters, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Inter-laboratory differences in the apparent quantum yield for the photochemical production of dissolved inorganic carbon in inland waters and implications for photochemical rate modeling, 2022, Limnology and Oceanography Methods
  • Depth-resolved photochemical production of hydrogen peroxide in the global ocean using remotely sensed ocean color, 2022, Frontiers in Remote Sensing
  • Examining superoxide dynamics in irradiated natural waters, 2023, Limnology and Oceanography

Their work spans various topics including water quality monitoring and analysis, marine and coastal ecosystems, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, microplastics and plastic pollution, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, mercury impact and mitigation studies, and advanced oxidation water treatment.

Key subfields of their studies include industrial and manufacturing engineering, oceanography, global and planetary change, pollution, and atmospheric science.

Frequent collaborators in their research are:

  • Leanne C. Powers
  • David J. Kieber
  • Aron Stubbins
  • Zhu Xiao-hui
  • Cédric G. Fichot

Their work has been published in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Limnology and Oceanography Methods, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, and Limnology and Oceanography.

Best Publications

  • The decline and fate of an iron-induced subarctic phytoplankton bloom

    Philip W. Boyd;Cliff S. Law;C.S. Wong;Yukihiro Nojiri

  • Photochemical production of dissolved inorganic carbon from terrestrial organic matter: significance to the oceanic organic carbon cycle

    W. L. Miller;R. G. Zepp

  • Photochemical release of biologically available nitrogen from aquatic dissolved organic matter

    Karen L. Bushaw;Richard G. Zepp;Matthew A. Tarr;Daniel Schulz-Jander

  • Methods for reactive oxygen species (ROS) detection in aqueous environments

    Justina M. Burns;William J. Cooper;John L. Ferry;D. Whitney King

  • Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean

    X. Durrieu de Madron;C. Guieu;R. Sempéré;P. Conan

  • Interaction of photochemical and microbial processes in the degradation of refractory dissolved organic matter from a coastal marine environment

    William L. Miller;Mary Ann Moran

  • Hydrogen peroxide measurement in seawater by (p-hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid dimerization

    William L. Miller;Dana R. Kester

  • Resourceful heterotrophs make the most of light in the coastal ocean.

    Mary Ann Moran;William L. Miller

  • ACCELERATION OF LANDFILL STABILIZATION USING LEACHATE RECYCLE

    T. G. Townsend;W. L. Miller;Hyung-Jib Lee;J. F. K. Earle

  • Photochemical redox cycling of iron in coastal seawater

    William L. Miller;William L. Miller;D.Whitney King;Jie Lin;Dana R. Kester

  • Determination of apparent quantum yield spectra for the formation of biologically labile photoproducts

    William L. Miller;Mary Ann Moran;Wade M. Sheldon;Richard G. Zepp

  • Quantum yield for the photochemical production of dissolved inorganic carbon in seawater

    Sophia C Johannessen;William L Miller

  • Dissolved organic matter composition and photochemical transformations in the northern North Pacific Ocean

    Patricia. M. Medeiros;Michael Seidel;Michael Seidel;Leanne C. Powers;Thorsten Dittmar

  • Direct carbon monoxide photoproduction from plant matter

    Matthew A. Tarr;William L. Miller;Richard G. Zepp

  • Effect of fire on soil‐atmosphere exchange of methane and carbon dioxide in Canadian boreal forest sites

    Roger A. Burke;Richard G. Zepp;Matthew A. Tarr;William L. Miller

  • Effects of UV Radiation on Aquatic Humus: Photochemical Principles and Experimental Considerations

    William L. Miller

  • Nonequilibrium sorption and aerobic biodegradation of dissolved alkylbenzenes during transport in aquifer material: column experiments and evaluation of a coupled-process model

    Joseph T. Angley;Mark L. Brusseau;W. Lamar Miller;Joseph J. Delfino

  • Ultraviolet attenuation by dissolved and particulate constituents of first-year ice during late spring in an Arctic polynya

    Claude Belzile;Sophia C. Johannessen;Michel Gosselin;Serge Demers

  • An approach to quantify depth-resolved marine photochemical fluxes using remote sensing: Application to carbon monoxide (CO) photoproduction

    Cédric G. Fichot;Cédric G. Fichot;William L. Miller

  • A novel molecular approach for tracing terrigenous dissolved organic matter into the deep ocean

    Patricia M. Medeiros;Michael Seidel;Michael Seidel;Jutta Niggemann;Robert G. M. Spencer

  • Photodegradation of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) in natural waters: laboratory assessment of the nitrate-photolysis-induced DMS oxidation.

    René-Christian Bouillon;William L. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard G. Zepp
Richard G. Zepp Environmental Protection Agency
Richard Sempéré
Richard Sempéré Aix-Marseille University
Robert H. Byrne
Robert H. Byrne University of South Florida
Patrick Raimbault
Patrick Raimbault Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography
Mary Ann Moran
Mary Ann Moran University of Georgia
Marcel Babin
Marcel Babin Université Laval
Philip W. Boyd
Philip W. Boyd University of Tasmania
Jean-François Ghiglione
Jean-François Ghiglione Sorbonne University
Michel Gosselin
Michel Gosselin Université du Québec à Rimouski
Louis Marie Prieur
Louis Marie Prieur Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in branching out from Environmental Sciences, a variety of online degree options offer flexible and affordable pathways to expand your expertise or shift your career focus. Programs like the eds to edd bridge program provide educators with a streamlined route to doctoral credentials, ideal for those passionate about environmental education and leadership.

Alternatively, students keen on integrating social impact with environmental work might explore online dsw programs in social work. These degrees prepare graduates to address complex social issues, which often intersect with environmental justice and sustainability.

For individuals seeking broader academic exposure or career flexibility, an affordable online general studies degree can be a valuable choice. This multidisciplinary approach enables students to tailor their learning while keeping costs manageable.

Lastly, those looking for the quickest way to earn a degree might consider options highlighted in what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, which discusses programs with lighter academic loads that can still open doors in environmental fields or related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing William L. Miller

Trending Scientists