World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4071
World Ranking
7705
National Ranking
2611

Philip H. Stauffer publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip H. Stauffer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 233 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Philip H. Stauffer D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip H. Stauffer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip H. Stauffer is affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States, where their research contributions focus on engineering and environmental science. Their work covers a range of topics primarily related to subsurface fluid flow, reservoir analysis, and CO2 sequestration.

The scientist's publication record includes multiple recent papers exploring complex aspects of carbon dioxide storage and reservoir behavior. Notable publications include:

  • The FluidFlower Validation Benchmark Study for the Storage of CO2, 2023, Transport in Porous Media
  • Impact of reservoir parameters and wellbore permeability uncertainties on CO2 and brine leakage potential at the Shenhua CO2 Storage Site, China, 2021, International journal of greenhouse gas control
  • A Hierarchical Framework for CO2 Storage Capacity in Deep Saline Aquifer Formations, 2022, Frontiers in Earth Science
  • Coupled multiphase flow and transport simulation to model CO2 dissolution and local capillary trapping in permeability and capillary heterogeneous reservoir, 2021, International journal of greenhouse gas control
  • Great SCO2T! Rapid tool for carbon sequestration science, engineering, and economics, 2021, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

Their collaborations involve frequent co-authors, including Hari Viswanathan, Jeffrey D. Hyman, Hakim Boukhalfa, D. R. Harp, and Matthew Sweeney, reflecting a sustained engagement with a core group of researchers in related fields.

Publication venues where this scientist has frequently contributed include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • International journal of greenhouse gas control
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Their work is broadly situated in the fields of engineering and environmental science, with particular subfields of study comprising environmental engineering, ocean engineering, mechanical engineering, mechanics of materials, and geophysics.

Main topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis
  • CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions
  • Geophysical methods and applications
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics
  • Seismic imaging and inversion techniques

Best Publications

  • Simulation of industrial-scale CO2 storage: Multi-scale heterogeneity and its impacts on storage capacity, injectivity and leakage

    Hailin Deng;Philip H. Stauffer;Zhenxue Dai;Zunsheng Jiao

  • The cross-scale science of CO2 capture and storage: from pore scale to regional scale

    Richard S. Middleton;Gordon N. Keating;Philip H. Stauffer;Amy B. Jordan

  • Development of a hybrid process and system model for the assessment of wellbore leakage at a geologic CO2 sequestration site.

    Hari S. Viswanathan;Rajesh J. Pawar;Philip H. Stauffer;John P. Kaszuba

  • A system model for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide.

    Philip H. Stauffer;Hari S. Viswanathan;Rajesh J. Pawar;George D. Guthrie

  • Non-modal growth of perturbations in density-driven convection in porous media

    Saikiran Rapaka;Shiyi Chen;Rajesh J. Pawar;Philip H. Stauffer

  • Greening coal: breakthroughs and challenges in carbon capture and storage.

    Philip H. Stauffer;Gordon N. Keating;Richard S. Middleton;Hari S. Viswanathan

  • Pre-site characterization risk analysis for commercial-scale carbon sequestration.

    Zhenxue Dai;Philip H. Stauffer;J. William Carey;Richard S. Middleton

  • Heterogeneity-assisted carbon dioxide storage in marine sediments

    Zhenxue Dai;Zhenxue Dai;Ye Zhang;Jeffrey Bielicki;Mohammad Amin Amooie

  • Hydrothermal recharge and discharge guided by basement outcrops on 0.7-3.6 Ma seafloor east of the Juan de Fuca Ridge: Observations and numerical models

    M. Hutnak;A. T. Fisher;L. Zühlsdorff;V. Spiess

  • Consolidation patterns during initiation and evolution of a plate-boundary decollement zone: Northern Barbados accretionary prism

    J. Casey Moore;Adam Klaus;Nathan L. Bangs;Barbara Bekins

  • The National Risk Assessment Partnership’s integrated assessment model for carbon storage: A tool to support decision making amidst uncertainty

    Rajesh J. Pawar;Grant S. Bromhal;Shaoping Chu;Robert M. Dilmore

  • Probabilistic evaluation of shallow groundwater resources at a hypothetical carbon sequestration site

    Zhenxue Dai;Elizabeth Keating;Diana H. Bacon;Hari Viswanathan

  • Effects of geologic reservoir uncertainty on CO2 transport and storage infrastructure

    Richard S. Middleton;Gordon N. Keating;Hari S. Viswanathan;Philip H. Stauffer

  • Malaya and Southeast Asia in the pattern of Continental Drift

    Unknown

  • Onset of convection over a transient base-state in anisotropic and layered porous media

    Saikiran Rapaka;Rajesh J. Pawar;Philip H. Stauffer;Dongxiao Zhang

  • A response surface model to predict CO2 and brine leakage along cemented wellbores

    Amy B. Jordan;Philip H. Stauffer;Dylan Harp;J. William Carey

  • Upscaled discrete fracture matrix model (UDFM): an octree-refined continuum representation of fractured porous media

    Matthew R. Sweeney;Carl W. Gable;Satish Karra;Philip H. Stauffer

  • The hydrothermal alteration of cooling lava domes

    Jessica L. Ball;Jessica L. Ball;Philip H. Stauffer;Eliza S. Calder;Greg A. Valentine

  • Potential CO2 and brine leakage through wellbore pathways for geologic CO2 sequestration using the National Risk Assessment Partnership tools: Application to the Big Sky Regional Partnership

    Tsubasa Onishi;Tsubasa Onishi;Minh C. Nguyen;Minh C. Nguyen;J. William Carey;Bob Will

  • Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis.

    Gordon N Keating;Richard S Middleton;Philip H Stauffer;Hari S Viswanathan

  • Upscaling retardation factor in hierarchical porous media with multimodal reactive mineral facies.

    Hailin Deng;Zhenxue Dai;Andrew V. Wolfsberg;Ming Ye

  • Radionuclide Gas Transport through Nuclear Explosion-Generated Fracture Networks

    Amy B. Jordan;Philip H. Stauffer;Earl E. Knight;Esteban Rougier

  • Investigation of uncertainty in CO2 reservoir models: A sensitivity analysis of relative permeability parameter values

    Nozomu Yoshida;Nozomu Yoshida;Jonathan S. Levine;Philip H. Stauffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajesh J. Pawar
Rajesh J. Pawar United States Department of Energy
Hari S. Viswanathan
Hari S. Viswanathan Los Alamos National Laboratory
Carl W. Gable
Carl W. Gable Los Alamos National Laboratory
Zhenxue Dai
Zhenxue Dai Los Alamos National Laboratory
Andrew T. Fisher
Andrew T. Fisher University of California, Santa Cruz
Ronald C. Surdam
Ronald C. Surdam University of Wyoming
J. William Carey
J. William Carey Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jonny Rutqvist
Jonny Rutqvist Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Mark Person
Mark Person New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Shiyi Chen
Shiyi Chen Southern University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA often leads to diverse academic and career options. For seniors or those seeking an expedited route, one-year degrees for seniors offer a practical way to gain relevant knowledge without long-term commitment. These programs can serve as an excellent foundation or complement to an existing Earth Science background.

Those interested in interdisciplinary fields might consider the online MLIS degree ALA accredited programs. These degrees open doors to careers in library and information science, which increasingly involve managing vast data sets including geological and environmental information.

When evaluating educational paths, prospective students often ask, is a library science degree worth it? The answer depends on career goals; for individuals passionate about information management and research, a library science degree can enhance opportunities, especially in academic or research institutions focused on Earth Science.

Additionally, for those with a creative inclination, combining Earth Science with a photography degree online can be rewarding. This unique pairing allows for documenting natural phenomena and landscapes, supporting careers in environmental communication and scientific reporting.

Best Scientists Citing Philip H. Stauffer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles