World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
11017
World Ranking
6595
National Ranking
444

Marc D. Lewis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc D. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marc D. Lewis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc D. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc D. Lewis is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their academic profile includes involvement in various research activities associated with this institution.

This scientist's work does not have publicly listed recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues available at this time. Likewise, there is no recorded information regarding book publications, main fields, subfields of study, or thematic topics related to their research output.

No awards or formal recognitions connected to Marc D. Lewis have been documented in the present data.

Given the absence of detailed publication and collaborative data, the profile focuses on the confirmed institutional affiliation without elaboration on scientific contributions or research domains.

Best Publications

  • Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling.

    Marc D. Lewis

  • Primary structure and biological activity of a novel human neurotrophic factor

    A. Rosenthal;D.V. Goeddel;T. Nguyen;M. Lewis

  • The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development.

    Marc D. Lewis

  • Development of Hot and Cool Executive Function during the Transition to Adolescence.

    Angela Prencipe;Amanda Kesek;Julia Cohen;Connie Lamm

  • An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards

    C.J. Griffith;R.A. Cooper;J. Gilmore;C. Davies

  • A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development

    Marcn D. Lewis;Alex V. Lamey;Lori Douglas

  • Reassessing Emotion Regulation

    Ross A. Thompson;Marc D. Lewis;Susan D. Calkins

  • Neurophysiological Correlates of Emotion Regulation in Children and Adolescents

    Marc D. Lewis;Connie Lamm;Sidney J. Segalowitz;Jim Stieben

  • Neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence: disentangling the contributions of age and executive function.

    Connie Lamm;Philip David Zelazo;Marc D. Lewis

  • The Biology of Desire: Why Addiction Is Not a Disease

    Marc Lewis

  • Emotion, development, and self-organization : dynamic systems approaches to emotional development

    Marc D. Lewis;Isabela Granic

  • Cognition-Emotion Feedback and the Self-Organization of Developmental Paths

    Marc D. Lewis

  • The self-regulating brain: Cortical-subcortical feedback and the development of intelligent action

    Marc D. Lewis;Rebecca M. Todd

  • Emotion regulation in the brain: conceptual issues and directions for developmental research.

    Marc D. Lewis;Jim Stieben

  • The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in normally developing compulsive-like behaviors and obsessive–compulsive disorder

    David W. Evans;Marc D. Lewis;Emily Iobst

  • Addiction and the Brain: Development, Not Disease

    Marc Lewis

  • A Dynamic Systems Analysis of Parent-child Changes Associated with Successful "Real-world" Interventions for Aggressive Children

    Isabela Granic;Arland O’Hara;Debra Pepler;Marc D. Lewis

  • Emotional self-organization at three time scales.

    Marc D. Lewis

  • A state space analysis of emotion and flexibility in parent-child interactions.

    Tom Hollenstein;Marc D. Lewis

  • Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children with behavior problems.

    Marc D. Lewis;Isabela Granic;Connie Lamm;Philip David Zelazo

Frequent Co-Authors

Isabela Granic
Isabela Granic Radboud University
Rebecca M. Todd
Rebecca M. Todd University of British Columbia
Philip David Zelazo
Philip David Zelazo University of Minnesota
Tom Hollenstein
Tom Hollenstein Queen's University
Katharina Manassis
Katharina Manassis University of Toronto
Margot J. Taylor
Margot J. Taylor University of Toronto
Sidney J. Segalowitz
Sidney J. Segalowitz Brock University
Mark L. Howe
Mark L. Howe City, University of London
Debra Pepler
Debra Pepler York University
Ross A. Thompson
Ross A. Thompson University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing an online degree in psychology opens multiple career pathways, each with distinct roles and educational requirements. One common question is the difference between a clinical therapist vs clinical psychologist. While both help individuals manage mental health issues, clinical psychologists typically hold a doctoral degree and conduct psychological testing and research, whereas therapists may focus on counseling after a master’s degree.

For those interested in advanced research or academic positions, exploring jobs for phd in psychology reveals opportunities in teaching, clinical supervision, policy-making, and specialized healthcare roles. If you’re passionate about sports and human performance, a master's can lead to unique roles and solid salaries, as shown in masters in sports psychology salary.

Psychology graduates can also thrive in corporate settings. Learning what does an organizational psychologist do highlights roles in talent management, workplace wellbeing, and leadership development. No matter your focus, online psychology degrees provide flexibility to launch or advance careers across mental health, sports, education, and organizational fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marc D. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles