World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
60031
World Ranking
10649
National Ranking
5476

William E. Mitch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Mitch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 331 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William E. Mitch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Mitch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Mitch is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research work spans multiple areas primarily within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Mitch's scientific contributions focus extensively on nephrology, physiology, and molecular biology, addressing complex issues in chronic kidney disease and related metabolic conditions.

Their recent papers reflect investigations into muscle loss mechanisms, kidney disease complications, and insulin resistance pathways. Notable publications include:

  • Pathophysiological mechanisms leading to muscle loss in chronic kidney disease, 2021, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Chronic kidney disease promotes atrial fibrillation via inflammasome pathway activation, 2023, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Stat3 activation induces insulin resistance via a muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase Fbxo40, 2020, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • PDGFRA in vascular adventitial MSCs promotes neointima formation in arteriovenous fistula in chronic kidney disease, 2020, JCI Insight
  • Phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ deficiency attenuates kidney injury and fibrosis in angiotensin II-induced hypertension, 2020, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Mitch collaborates regularly with a group of frequent co-authors, including Jizhong Cheng, Sandhya S. Thomas, Qunying Guo, Luan D. Truong, and Jiao Wu. Their teamwork has resulted in multiple joint publications.

Their work appears frequently in key nephrology and physiology journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • JCI Insight

William E. Mitch's research covers a range of interconnected medical subfields, with a concentration on nephrology, physiology, molecular biology, cell biology, and surgery. These areas underpin their investigation of chronic kidney disease, renal disease management, and metabolic disorders.

Main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Dialysis and renal disease management
  • Nutrition and health in aging
  • Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Chronic kidney disease and diabetes
  • Muscle physiology and disorders
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Adipokines, inflammation, and metabolic diseases

Best Publications

  • EFFECTS OF LOSARTAN ON RENAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND NEPHROPATHY

    Barry M. Brenner;Mark E. Cooper;Dick De Zeeuw;William F. Keane

  • AHA Dietary Guidelines Revision 2000: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association

    Ronald M. Krauss;Robert H. Eckel;Barbara Howard;Lawrence J. Appel

  • Diabetes and cardiovascular disease : A statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association

    Scott M. Grundy;Ivor J. Benjamin;Gregory L. Burke;Alan Chait

  • Cachexia: a new definition.

    William J. Evans;John E. Morley;Josep Argilés;Connie Bales

  • A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein–energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease

    D. Fouque;K. Kalantar-Zadeh;J. Kopple;N. Cano

  • Oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin leads to uncoupling of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase in hypertension

    Ulf Landmesser;Sergey Dikalov;S. Russ Price;Louise McCann

  • Multiple types of skeletal muscle atrophy involve a common program of changes in gene expression

    Stewart H. Lecker;R. Thomas Jagoe;Alexander Gilbert;Marcelo Gomes

  • Protein Degradation by the Ubiquitin–Proteasome Pathway in Normal and Disease States

    Stewart H. Lecker;Alfred L. Goldberg;William E. Mitch

  • Mechanisms of muscle wasting. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.

    William E. Mitch;Alfred L. Goldberg

  • Proteinuria, a target for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: Lessons from RENAAL

    Dick De Zeeuw;Giuseppe Remuzzi;Hans Henrik Parving;William F. Keane

  • Albuminuria, a Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Protection in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy

    Dick De Zeeuw;Giuseppe Remuzzi;Hans Henrik Parving;William F. Keane

  • Etiology of the Protein-Energy Wasting Syndrome in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Consensus Statement From the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM)

    Juan Jesús Carrero;Peter Stenvinkel;Lilian Cuppari;T. Alp Ikizler

  • Muscle Protein Breakdown and the Critical Role of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway in Normal and Disease States

    Stewart H. Lecker;Vered Solomon;William E. Mitch;Alfred L. Goldberg

  • A method for estimating nitrogen intake of patients with chronic renal failure

    Bradley J. Maroni;Theodore I. Steinman;William E. Mitch

  • Activation of caspase-3 is an initial step triggering accelerated muscle proteolysis in catabolic conditions

    Jie Du;Xiaonan Wang;Christiane Miereles;James L. Bailey

  • The risk of developing end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: the RENAAL study.

    William F. Keane;Barry M. Brenner;Dick de Zeeuw;Jean-Pierre Grunfeld

  • A SIMPLE METHOD OF ESTIMATING PROGRESSION OF CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE

    W.E. Mitch;M. Walser;G.A. Buffington;J. Lemann

  • Insulin resistance accelerates muscle protein degradation: Activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by defects in muscle cell signaling.

    Xiaonan Wang;Zhaoyong Hu;Junping Hu;Jie Du

  • Mechanisms of muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease

    Xiaonan H. Wang;William E. Mitch

  • Development and Progression of Renal Disease in Pima Indians with Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

    Robert G. Nelson;Peter H. Bennett;Gerald J. Beck;Ming Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jie Du
Jie Du Capital Medical University
Denis Fouque
Denis Fouque Hôpital Édouard-Herriot
Joel D. Kopple
Joel D. Kopple University of California, Los Angeles
T. Alp Ikizler
T. Alp Ikizler Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Alfred L. Goldberg
Alfred L. Goldberg Harvard University
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh University of California, Irvine
Dick de Zeeuw
Dick de Zeeuw University of Groningen
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Giuseppe Remuzzi Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
William F. Keane
William F. Keane University of Minnesota
George A. Kaysen
George A. Kaysen University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to many online degrees and diverse healthcare careers. For registered nurses, advancing your education can be streamlined through adn to np bridge programs, which provide an accessible way for ADN-prepared nurses to work toward becoming nurse practitioners.

If you’re interested in nutrition and wellness, earning an online dietitian degree can help prepare you for roles in clinical settings, community health, or even private practice. For those aiming for healthcare management or policy careers, choosing one of the cahme-accredited online mha programs ensures you receive a high standard of education recognized by the industry.

Some nurses seek flexible programs, and there are rn to bsn programs no clinicals for those who want to advance without additional on-site clinical requirements. These online pathways help busy healthcare professionals gain valuable skills while balancing work and study, supporting career growth in today’s evolving medical landscape.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Mitch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles