World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10914 10213 754 708 100 4343

Rebecca M. Todd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca M. Todd between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca M. Todd published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 14 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca M. Todd: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 4
2008 2
2009 3
2010 4
2011 2
2012 5
2013 5
2014 4
2015 9
2016 5
2017 18
2018 6
2019 5
2020 10
2021 9
2022 8
2023 8
2024 5
2025 9
Total 129
Download as CSV

Rebecca M. Todd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 100
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca M. Todd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca M. Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca M. Todd is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has a research focus encompassing neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, clinical psychology, and applied psychology.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Rebecca M. Todd include:

  • "Predictive Value of Acute Neuroplastic Response to rTMS in Treatment Outcome in Depression: A Concurrent TMS-fMRI Trial," 2022, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Affect-biased attention and predictive processing," 2020, Cognition
  • "From Architecture to Evolution: Multisensory Evidence of Decentralized Emotion," 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Rate of perceived stability as a measure of balance exercise intensity in people post-stroke," 2022, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • "In the hands of the beholder: Wearing a COVID-19 mask is associated with its attractiveness," 2021, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Frequent coauthors include:

  • James H. Kryklywy
  • Brandon J. Forys
  • Mana R. Ehlers
  • Adam K. Anderson
  • Andre Beukers

Preferred publication venues for their work are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eNeuro
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • PLoS ONE
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review.

    Matthew L. Dixon;Ravi Thiruchselvam;Rebecca Todd;Kalina Christoff

  • Affect-biased attention as emotion regulation

    Rebecca M. Todd;William A. Cunningham;William A. Cunningham;Adam K. Anderson;Evan Thompson

  • The self-regulating brain: Cortical-subcortical feedback and the development of intelligent action

    Marc D. Lewis;Rebecca M. Todd

  • Tuning to the significant: Neural and genetic processes underlying affective enhancement of visual perception and memory

    Jelena Markovic;Adam K. Anderson;Rebecca M. Todd

  • Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children with behavior problems.

    Marc D. Lewis;Isabela Granic;Connie Lamm;Philip David Zelazo

  • Dynamics of neural recruitment surrounding the spontaneous arising of thoughts in experienced mindfulness practitioners

    Melissa Ellamil;Kieran C.R. Fox;Matthew L. Dixon;Sean Pritchard

  • The time course of social-emotional processing in early childhood : ERP responses to facial affect and personal familiarity in a Go-Nogo task

    Rebecca M. Todd;Marc D. Lewis;Liesel Ann Meusel;Philip David Zelazo

  • Psychophysical and Neural Evidence for Emotion-Enhanced Perceptual Vividness

    Rebecca M. Todd;Deborah Talmi;Taylor W. Schmitz;Josh Susskind

  • Genes for Emotion-Enhanced Remembering Are Linked to Enhanced Perceiving

    Rebecca M. Todd;Daniel J. Müller;Daniel H. Lee;Amanda Robertson

  • Implicit guidance of attention: The priority state space framework.

    Rebecca M. Todd;Maria G.M. Manaligod

  • Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes

    Yaqing Niu;Rebecca Todd;Adam K Anderson

  • Neurogenetic variations in norepinephrine availability enhance perceptual vividness

    Rebecca M. Todd;Mana R. Ehlers;Daniel J. Müller;Amanda Robertson

  • The changing face of emotion: age-related patterns of amygdala activation to salient faces

    Rebecca M. Todd;Jennifer W. Evans;Drew Morris;Marc D. Lewis

  • Event-related potential measures of emotion regulation in early childhood.

    Marc D. Lewis;Rebecca M. Todd;Michael J.M. Honsberger

  • Deletion variant in the ADRA2B gene increases coupling between emotional responses at encoding and later retrieval of emotional memories.

    R.M. Todd;D.J. Müller;D.J. Palombo;A. Robertson

  • Neurophysiological correlates of executive function: a comparison of European-Canadian and Chinese-Canadian 5-year-old children

    Ayelet Lahat;Rebecca M. Todd;Caitlin Emma Victoria Mahy;Karen Lau

  • Emotional Objectivity: Neural Representations of Emotions and Their Interaction with Cognition

    Rebecca M. Todd;Vladimir Miskovic;Junichi Chikazoe;Adam K. Anderson

  • The development of consciousness

    Philip David Zelazo;Helena Hong Gao;Rebecca Todd

  • Genetic differences in emotionally enhanced memory

    Rebecca M. Todd;Daniela J. Palombo;Brian Levine;Adam K. Anderson

  • KIBRA polymorphism is associated with individual differences in hippocampal subregions: evidence from anatomical segmentation using high-resolution MRI.

    Daniela J. Palombo;Robert S.C. Amaral;Rosanna K. Olsen;Rosanna K. Olsen;Daniel J. Müller;Daniel J. Müller

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam K. Anderson
Adam K. Anderson Cornell University
Brian Levine
Brian Levine University of Toronto
Marc D. Lewis
Marc D. Lewis University of Toronto
Margot J. Taylor
Margot J. Taylor University of Toronto
Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Evan Thompson
Evan Thompson University of British Columbia
Matthias J. Wieser
Matthias J. Wieser Erasmus University Rotterdam
Philip David Zelazo
Philip David Zelazo University of Minnesota
Rosanna K. Olsen
Rosanna K. Olsen University of Toronto
William A. Cunningham
William A. Cunningham University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens up various career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Online programs allow you to gain essential skills and knowledge while remaining flexible with your location and schedule.

If you are interested in becoming a mental health counselor, each state and city may have unique certification requirements. For example, Tucson mental health counselor certification requirements might differ from those in other parts of Arizona or the country. Similarly, Tulsa mental health counselor certification requirements highlight the specific steps you must take in Oklahoma.

Students considering careers in the east can review the Virginia Beach mental health counselor certification requirements, which outline Virginia’s licensing processes. In the nation’s capital, professionals should consult the mental health counselor requirements in Washington DC to ensure compliance before practicing.

Researching these pathways can help you choose an online psychology degree aligned with your career ambitions and local licensing standards.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca M. Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles