World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4331 4002 2412 2179 148 16396

Andres De Los Reyes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andres De Los Reyes between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andres De Los Reyes published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2024. 85 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2024. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 53 publications 2025: 32 publications
2004 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andres De Los Reyes: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 4
2010 8
2011 10
2012 9
2013 8
2014 4
2015 13
2016 13
2017 9
2018 11
2019 12
2020 5
2021 16
2022 19
2023 10
2024 53
2025 32
Total 243
Download as CSV

Andres De Los Reyes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andres De Los Reyes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andres De Los Reyes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andres De Los Reyes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Andres De Los Reyes is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, education, social psychology, and safety research. The main topics of their work include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, early childhood education and development, mental health research topics, youth development and social support, attachment and relationship dynamics, and health policy implementation science.

They have contributed extensively to the academic literature, with recent papers including the following:

  • "Introduction to the Special Issue. A Dozen Years of Demonstrating That Informant Discrepancies are More Than Measurement Error: Toward Guidelines for Integrating Data from Multi-Informant Assessments of Youth Mental Health" (2023), published in the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • "Integrating Multiple Informants' Reports: How Conceptual and Measurement Models May Address Long-Standing Problems in Clinical Decision-Making" (2020), published in Clinical Psychological Science
  • "The Needs-to-Goals Gap: How informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments impact service delivery" (2021), published in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "The Operations Triad Model and Youth Mental Health Assessments: Catalyzing a Paradigm Shift in Measurement Validation" (2022), presented in the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • "A Paradigm for Understanding Adolescent Social Anxiety with Unfamiliar Peers: Conceptual Foundations and Directions for Future Research" (2020), published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Andres De Los Reyes include:

  • Bridget A. Makol (27 collaborations)
  • Mo Wang (19 collaborations)
  • Sarah J. Racz (12 collaborations)
  • Eric A. Youngstrom (6 collaborations)
  • Noor Qasmieh (6 collaborations)

Their research has been published multiple times in notable venues, most frequently in:

  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (6 publications)
  • Behavior Therapy (5 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (4 publications)
  • Clinical Psychological Science (3 publications)
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints) (3 publications)

In addition to articles, Andres De Los Reyes has published books with respected academic publishers, including:

  • Youth Development in Context (expected 2025), published by Springer International Publishing
  • Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2024), published by Cambridge University Press

Their professional recognitions include being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study.

    Andres De Los Reyes;Alan E. Kazdin

  • The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.

    Andres De Los Reyes;Tara M. Augenstein;Mo Wang;Sarah A. Thomas

  • Introduction to the Special Section: More Than Measurement Error: Discovering Meaning Behind Informant Discrepancies in Clinical Assessments of Children and Adolescents

    Andres De Los Reyes

  • Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic factor in the development of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology: Current and future directions.

    Amelia Aldao;Dylan G. Gee;Andres De Los Reyes;Ilana Seager

  • Principles Underlying the Use of Multiple Informants' Reports

    Andres De Los Reyes;Sarah A. Thomas;Kimberly L. Goodman;Shannon M.A. Kundey

  • Measuring Informant Discrepancies in Clinical Child Research.

    Andres De Los Reyes;Alan E. Kazdin

  • Linking Informant Discrepancies to Observed Variations in Young Children’s Disruptive Behavior

    Andres De Los Reyes;David B. Henry;Patrick H. Tolan;Lauren S. Wakschlag

  • Testing Informant Discrepancies as Predictors of Early Adolescent Psychopathology: Why Difference Scores Cannot Tell You What You Want to Know and How Polynomial Regression May

    Robert D. Laird;Andres De Los Reyes

  • Annual Research Review: Embracing not erasing contextual variability in children’s behavior – theory and utility in the selection and use of methods and informants in developmental psychopathology

    Melanie A. Dirks;Andres De Los Reyes;Margaret Briggs-Gowan;David Cella

  • Applying depression-distortion hypotheses to the assessment of peer victimization in adolescents.

    Andres De Los Reyes;Mitchell J. Prinstein

  • Introduction to the Special Issue: Discrepancies in Adolescent–Parent Perceptions of the Family and Adolescent Adjustment

    Andres De Los Reyes;Christine McCauley Ohannessian

  • The Longitudinal Consistency of Mother-Child Reporting Discrepancies of Parental Monitoring and Their Ability to Predict Child Delinquent Behaviors Two Years Later

    Andres De Los Reyes;Kimberly L. Goodman;Wendy Kliewer;Kathryn Reid-Quiñones

  • Strategic objectives for improving understanding of informant discrepancies in developmental psychopathology research.

    Andres De Los Reyes

  • Considering ERP difference scores as individual difference measures: Issues with subtraction and alternative approaches.

    Alexandria Meyer;Matthew D. Lerner;Andres De Los Reyes;Robert D. Laird

  • Emotion regulation in context: Examining the spontaneous use of strategies across emotional intensity and type of emotion

    Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon;Amelia Aldao;Andres De Los Reyes

  • Conceptualizing changes in behavior in intervention research: the range of possible changes model.

    Andres De Los Reyes;Alan E. Kazdin

  • Discrepancies Between Adolescent and Parent Reports About Family Relationships

    Andres De Los Reyes;Christine M. Ohannessian;Sarah J. Racz

  • Repertoires of emotion regulation: A person-centered approach to assessing emotion regulation strategies and links to psychopathology.

    Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon;Amelia Aldao;Andres De Los Reyes

  • Whose depression relates to discrepancies? Testing relations between informant characteristics and informant discrepancies from both informants' perspectives.

    Andres De Los Reyes;Kimberly L. Goodman;Wendy Kliewer;Kathryn Reid-Quiñones

  • Understanding parent-child social informant discrepancy in youth with high functioning autism spectrum disorders.

    Matthew D. Lerner;Casey D. Calhoun;Amori Yee Mikami;Andres De Los Reyes

  • Group intervention to promote social skills in school-age children with pervasive developmental disorders: reconsidering efficacy.

    Kathleen Koenig;Andres De Los Reyes;Domenic Cicchetti;Lawrence Scahill

Frequent Co-Authors

Amelia Aldao
Amelia Aldao Together CBT
Matthew D. Lerner
Matthew D. Lerner Stony Brook University
Christine McCauley Ohannessian
Christine McCauley Ohannessian Florida State University
Eric A. Youngstrom
Eric A. Youngstrom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Deborah A. G. Drabick
Deborah A. G. Drabick Temple University
Alan E. Kazdin
Alan E. Kazdin Yale University
Candice A. Alfano
Candice A. Alfano University of Houston
Jessica L. Borelli
Jessica L. Borelli University of California, Irvine
Robert D. Laird
Robert D. Laird University of Alabama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to several rewarding pathways, especially with the increasing availability of online degree programs. Many students are interested in roles where they can positively impact individuals and communities, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The journey to becoming a bcba in Kansas City, for example, starts with obtaining an appropriate graduate degree in psychology, education, or applied behavior analysis.

Each state has its own specific requirements for BCBA certification. Those interested in Laredo bcba education requirements will find that practical fieldwork, supervised experience, and meeting examination standards are crucial steps. Meanwhile, bcba certification requirements in Las Vegas also emphasize accredited coursework and a deep understanding of applied behavior analysis methodologies.

Online degree programs make it possible to pursue these credentials flexibly, while specialized programs can meet local standards, such as those for becoming a bcba in Lexington. Continuous professional development and staying current with state requirements are essential for any aspiring psychologist or BCBA. Assessing your interests, educational background, and preferred location can help determine the best online degree and career pathway for your psychology journey.

Best Scientists Citing Andres De Los Reyes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles