World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
7719
World Ranking
9051
National Ranking
136

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7619
World Ranking
11058
National Ranking
93

Anttoni Jaakkola publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anttoni Jaakkola sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anttoni Jaakkola D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anttoni Jaakkola sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anttoni Jaakkola is affiliated with the Finnish Geospatial Research Institute in Finland. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, including Physics and Astronomy, Environmental Science, and Medicine, with particular focus on subfields such as Instrumentation, Environmental Engineering, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's work concentrates on advanced technical and scientific topics, including:

  • Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Ocular and Laser Science Research

Jaakkola has contributed to the academic community through publications appearing in venues such as Sensors. Their recent notable paper, published in 2022, is titled Feasibility of Hyperspectral Single Photon Lidar for Robust Autonomous Vehicle Perception, which appeared in Sensors. This publication has gathered citations reflecting interest in autonomous vehicle perception using optical sensing methods.

Collaborations have been an integral part of their scientific activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Josef Taher
  • Teemu Hakala
  • Heikki Hyyti
  • Antero Kukko
  • Petri Manninen

These collaborations indicate a research network focused on geospatial sensing and related technologies, integrating expertise in instrumentation and environmental applications. Jaakkola's work bridges multiple scientific domains, applying advanced optical and laser technologies to both environmental and medical challenges.

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories

    Xinlian Liang;Xinlian Liang;Ville Kankare;Ville Kankare;Juha Hyyppä;Juha Hyyppä;Yunsheng Wang;Yunsheng Wang

  • Remote sensing methods for power line corridor surveys

    Leena Matikainen;Matti Lehtomäki;Eero Ahokas;Juha Hyyppä

  • ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

    Unknown

  • Mini-UAV-Borne LIDAR for Fine-Scale Mapping

    Yi Lin;J Hyyppä;A Jaakkola

  • A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements

    Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppä;Antero Kukko;Xiaowei Yu

  • Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest

    Yunsheng Wang;Yunsheng Wang;Matti Lehtomäki;Matti Lehtomäki;Xinlian Liang;Xinlian Liang;Jiri Pyörälä;Jiri Pyörälä;Jiri Pyörälä

  • Analysis of Incidence Angle and Distance Effects on Terrestrial Laser Scanner Intensity: Search for Correction Methods

    Sanna Kaasalainen;Anttoni Jaakkola;Mikko Kaasalainen;Anssi Krooks

  • Detection of Vertical Pole-Like Objects in a Road Environment Using Vehicle-Based Laser Scanning Data

    Matti Lehtomäki;Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppä;Antero Kukko

  • Seamless Mapping of River Channels at High Resolution Using Mobile LiDAR and UAV-Photography

    Claude Flener;Matti Vaaja;Anttoni Jaakkola;Anssi Krooks

  • Retrieval Algorithms for Road Surface Modelling Using Laser-Based Mobile Mapping

    Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppä;Hannu Hyyppä;Antero Kukko

  • Advances in Forest Inventory Using Airborne Laser Scanning

    Juha Hyyppä;Xiaowei Yu;Hannu Hyyppä;Mikko Vastaranta

  • Comparison of the Selected State-Of-The-Art 3D Indoor Scanning and Point Cloud Generation Methods

    Ville V. Lehtola;Harri Kaartinen;Andreas Nüchter;Risto Kaijaluoto

  • The Use of a Mobile Laser Scanning System for Mapping Large Forest Plots

    Xinlian Liang;Juha Hyyppa;Antero Kukko;Harri Kaartinen

  • Feasibility of Terrestrial laser scanning for collecting stem volume information from single trees

    Ninni Saarinen;Ninni Saarinen;Ville Kankare;Ville Kankare;Mikko Vastaranta;Mikko Vastaranta;Ville Luoma;Ville Luoma

  • Application of boat‐based laser scanning for river survey

    P. Alho;A. Kukko;H. Hyyppä;H. Kaartinen

  • Radiometric Calibration of LIDAR Intensity With Commercially Available Reference Targets

    S. Kaasalainen;H. Hyyppa;A. Kukko;P. Litkey

  • Accuracy of Kinematic Positioning Using Global Satellite Navigation Systems under Forest Canopies

    Harri Kaartinen;Juha Hyyppä;Mikko Vastaranta;Antero Kukko

  • Comparison of Laser and Stereo Optical, SAR and InSAR Point Clouds from Air- and Space-Borne Sources in the Retrieval of Forest Inventory Attributes

    Xiaowei Yu;Juha Hyyppä;Mika Karjalainen;Kimmo Nurminen

  • Possibilities of a Personal Laser Scanning System for Forest Mapping and Ecosystem Services

    Xinlian Liang;Antero Kukko;Harri Kaartinen;Juha Hyyppä

  • Object Classification and Recognition From Mobile Laser Scanning Point Clouds in a Road Environment

    Matti Lehtomaki;Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppa;Jouko Lampinen

  • Forest Data Collection Using Terrestrial Image-Based Point Clouds From a Handheld Camera Compared to Terrestrial and Personal Laser Scanning

    Xinlian Liang;Yunsheng Wang;Anttoni Jaakkola;Antero Kukko

Frequent Co-Authors

Juha Hyyppä
Juha Hyyppä Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Antero Kukko
Antero Kukko Aalto University
Harri Kaartinen
Harri Kaartinen University of Turku
Hannu Hyyppä
Hannu Hyyppä Aalto University
Xinlian Liang
Xinlian Liang Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Markus Holopainen
Markus Holopainen University of Helsinki
Petteri Alho
Petteri Alho University of Turku
Mikko Vastaranta
Mikko Vastaranta University of Eastern Finland
Xiaowei Yu
Xiaowei Yu Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Sanna Kaasalainen
Sanna Kaasalainen Finnish Geospatial Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For those seeking flexibility, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers a budget-friendly way to start building foundational knowledge that supports environmental careers.

If you are exploring options that balance workload and career prospects, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help you find programs that suit your learning style while still providing relevant skills for environmental sector roles.

For students particularly interested in earth sciences, pursuing online geology degrees is an excellent choice. These programs provide in-depth knowledge about Earth's processes, which is crucial for careers in natural resource management, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a growing field within environmental studies. The best gis programs in the us equip students with skills in spatial data analysis, essential for tasks such as environmental planning, disaster response, and sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Anttoni Jaakkola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles