World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11058 10746 93 88 87 7619
Environmental Sciences 36 9053 8683 136 135 85 7719

Anttoni Jaakkola publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anttoni Jaakkola between 2008 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anttoni Jaakkola published across 17 years, from 2008 to 2024, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 1 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 2008: 3 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2008 2024

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anttoni Jaakkola: publications per year, 2008 to 2024
Year Publications
2008 3
2009 10
2010 6
2011 5
2012 11
2013 7
2014 9
2015 8
2016 22
2017 8
2018 3
2019 3
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 98
Download as CSV

Anttoni Jaakkola publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anttoni Jaakkola sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 85
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Anttoni Jaakkola D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anttoni Jaakkola sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206 36
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Anttoni Jaakkola is affiliated with the Finnish Geospatial Research Institute in Finland. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, including Physics and Astronomy, Environmental Science, and Medicine, with particular focus on subfields such as Instrumentation, Environmental Engineering, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's work concentrates on advanced technical and scientific topics, including:

  • Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Ocular and Laser Science Research

Jaakkola has contributed to the academic community through publications appearing in venues such as Sensors. Their recent notable paper, published in 2022, is titled Feasibility of Hyperspectral Single Photon Lidar for Robust Autonomous Vehicle Perception, which appeared in Sensors. This publication has gathered citations reflecting interest in autonomous vehicle perception using optical sensing methods.

Collaborations have been an integral part of their scientific activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Josef Taher
  • Teemu Hakala
  • Heikki Hyyti
  • Antero Kukko
  • Petri Manninen

These collaborations indicate a research network focused on geospatial sensing and related technologies, integrating expertise in instrumentation and environmental applications. Jaakkola's work bridges multiple scientific domains, applying advanced optical and laser technologies to both environmental and medical challenges.

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories

    Xinlian Liang;Xinlian Liang;Ville Kankare;Ville Kankare;Juha Hyyppä;Juha Hyyppä;Yunsheng Wang;Yunsheng Wang

  • Remote sensing methods for power line corridor surveys

    Leena Matikainen;Matti Lehtomäki;Eero Ahokas;Juha Hyyppä

  • ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

    Unknown

  • Mini-UAV-Borne LIDAR for Fine-Scale Mapping

    Yi Lin;J Hyyppä;A Jaakkola

  • A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements

    Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppä;Antero Kukko;Xiaowei Yu

  • Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest

    Yunsheng Wang;Yunsheng Wang;Matti Lehtomäki;Matti Lehtomäki;Xinlian Liang;Xinlian Liang;Jiri Pyörälä;Jiri Pyörälä;Jiri Pyörälä

  • Analysis of Incidence Angle and Distance Effects on Terrestrial Laser Scanner Intensity: Search for Correction Methods

    Sanna Kaasalainen;Anttoni Jaakkola;Mikko Kaasalainen;Anssi Krooks

  • Detection of Vertical Pole-Like Objects in a Road Environment Using Vehicle-Based Laser Scanning Data

    Matti Lehtomäki;Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppä;Antero Kukko

  • Seamless Mapping of River Channels at High Resolution Using Mobile LiDAR and UAV-Photography

    Claude Flener;Matti Vaaja;Anttoni Jaakkola;Anssi Krooks

  • Retrieval Algorithms for Road Surface Modelling Using Laser-Based Mobile Mapping

    Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppä;Hannu Hyyppä;Antero Kukko

  • Advances in Forest Inventory Using Airborne Laser Scanning

    Juha Hyyppä;Xiaowei Yu;Hannu Hyyppä;Mikko Vastaranta

  • Comparison of the Selected State-Of-The-Art 3D Indoor Scanning and Point Cloud Generation Methods

    Ville V. Lehtola;Harri Kaartinen;Andreas Nüchter;Risto Kaijaluoto

  • The Use of a Mobile Laser Scanning System for Mapping Large Forest Plots

    Xinlian Liang;Juha Hyyppa;Antero Kukko;Harri Kaartinen

  • Feasibility of Terrestrial laser scanning for collecting stem volume information from single trees

    Ninni Saarinen;Ninni Saarinen;Ville Kankare;Ville Kankare;Mikko Vastaranta;Mikko Vastaranta;Ville Luoma;Ville Luoma

  • Application of boat‐based laser scanning for river survey

    P. Alho;A. Kukko;H. Hyyppä;H. Kaartinen

  • Radiometric Calibration of LIDAR Intensity With Commercially Available Reference Targets

    S. Kaasalainen;H. Hyyppa;A. Kukko;P. Litkey

  • Accuracy of Kinematic Positioning Using Global Satellite Navigation Systems under Forest Canopies

    Harri Kaartinen;Juha Hyyppä;Mikko Vastaranta;Antero Kukko

  • Comparison of Laser and Stereo Optical, SAR and InSAR Point Clouds from Air- and Space-Borne Sources in the Retrieval of Forest Inventory Attributes

    Xiaowei Yu;Juha Hyyppä;Mika Karjalainen;Kimmo Nurminen

  • Possibilities of a Personal Laser Scanning System for Forest Mapping and Ecosystem Services

    Xinlian Liang;Antero Kukko;Harri Kaartinen;Juha Hyyppä

  • Object Classification and Recognition From Mobile Laser Scanning Point Clouds in a Road Environment

    Matti Lehtomaki;Anttoni Jaakkola;Juha Hyyppa;Jouko Lampinen

  • Forest Data Collection Using Terrestrial Image-Based Point Clouds From a Handheld Camera Compared to Terrestrial and Personal Laser Scanning

    Xinlian Liang;Yunsheng Wang;Anttoni Jaakkola;Antero Kukko

Frequent Co-Authors

Juha Hyyppä
Juha Hyyppä Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Antero Kukko
Antero Kukko Aalto University
Harri Kaartinen
Harri Kaartinen University of Turku
Hannu Hyyppä
Hannu Hyyppä Aalto University
Xinlian Liang
Xinlian Liang Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Markus Holopainen
Markus Holopainen University of Helsinki
Petteri Alho
Petteri Alho University of Turku
Mikko Vastaranta
Mikko Vastaranta University of Eastern Finland
Xiaowei Yu
Xiaowei Yu Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Sanna Kaasalainen
Sanna Kaasalainen Finnish Geospatial Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For those seeking flexibility, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers a budget-friendly way to start building foundational knowledge that supports environmental careers.

If you are exploring options that balance workload and career prospects, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help you find programs that suit your learning style while still providing relevant skills for environmental sector roles.

For students particularly interested in earth sciences, pursuing online geology degrees is an excellent choice. These programs provide in-depth knowledge about Earth's processes, which is crucial for careers in natural resource management, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a growing field within environmental studies. The best gis programs in the us equip students with skills in spatial data analysis, essential for tasks such as environmental planning, disaster response, and sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Anttoni Jaakkola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles