World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 112 5048 4734 494 472 557 73239

John R. Geddes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John R. Geddes between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John R. Geddes published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2019. 33 of the 631 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2019. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 7 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 20 publications
1990 2025

631 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John R. Geddes: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 7
1995 5
1996 18
1997 10
1998 8
1999 7
2000 8
2001 9
2002 10
2003 25
2004 15
2005 17
2006 29
2007 17
2008 15
2009 26
2010 14
2011 21
2012 20
2013 16
2014 25
2015 27
2016 38
2017 28
2018 31
2019 46
2020 15
2021 41
2022 25
2023 19
2024 13
2025 20
Total 631
Download as CSV

John R. Geddes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Geddes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 557 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 557
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John R. Geddes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Geddes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 112
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John R. Geddes is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. The primary areas of their research span Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Pharmacology.

Their main research topics cover Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Mental Health Research Topics, Treatment of Major Depression, Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John R. Geddes include Paul J. Harrison, Michael Bauer, Kate Saunders, Maxime Taquet, and Andrea Cipriani.

They have contributed numerous publications in several key venues, notably bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), The Lancet Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, JAMA Psychiatry, and Current Psychiatry Reports.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236,379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62,354 COVID-19 cases in the USA, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Incidence, co-occurrence, and evolution of long-COVID features: A 6-month retrospective cohort study of 273,618 survivors of COVID-19, 2021, PLoS Medicine
  • Medium-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on multiple vital organs, exercise capacity, cognition, quality of life and mental health, post-hospital discharge, 2021, EClinicalMedicine
  • Incidence and outcomes of eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, The British Journal of Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Toshi A Furukawa;Georgia Salanti;Anna Chaimani;Anna Chaimani;Anna Chaimani

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

    Stefan Leucht;Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Loukia Spineli;Dimitris Mavridis

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Toshiaki A Furukawa;Georgia Salanti;John R Geddes

  • Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    John Geddes

  • Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis

    John Geddes;Nick Freemantle;Paul Harrison;Paul Bebbington

  • The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations

    Seena Fazel;John R Geddes;Margot Kushel

  • Schizophrenia and Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Seena Fazel;Gautam Gulati;Louise Linsell;John R. Geddes

  • Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA

    Maxime Taquet;Maxime Taquet;Sierra Luciano;John R Geddes;John R Geddes;Paul J Harrison;Paul J Harrison

  • The prevalence of mental disorders among the homeless in western countries: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

    Seena Fazel;Vivek Khosla;Helen Doll;John Geddes

  • Psychological treatments in schizophrenia: I. Meta-analysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviour therapy

    S Pilling;P Bebbington;Elizabeth Kuipers;Philippa Garety

  • Relapse prevention with antidepressant drug treatment in depressive disorders: a systematic review

    John R Geddes;Stuart M Carney;Christina Davies;Toshiaki A Furukawa

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    G. M. Goodwin;P. M. Haddad;I. N. Ferrier;J. K. Aronson

  • Lithium toxicity profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Rebecca F McKnight;Marc Adida;Katie Budge;Sarah Stockton

  • Structural neuroimaging studies in major depressive disorder. Meta-analysis and comparison with bipolar disorder

    Matthew J Kempton;Zainab Salvador;Marcus R Munafò;John R Geddes

  • Treatment of bipolar disorder

    John R Geddes;David J Miklowitz;David J Miklowitz

  • Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Julian P T Higgins;John R Geddes;Georgia Salanti

  • Lithium in the prevention of suicide in mood disorders: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Keith E. Hawton;Sarah Stockton;John R. Geddes

  • Long-term lithium therapy for bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    John R. Geddes;Sally Burgess;Keith E. Hawton;Kay Jamison

  • Lithium in the Prevention of Suicidal Behavior and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

    Andrea Cipriani;Heather Pretty;Keith E. Hawton;John R. Geddes

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy M. Goodwin
Guy M. Goodwin University of Oxford
Andrea Cipriani
Andrea Cipriani University of Oxford
Paul J. Harrison
Paul J. Harrison University of Oxford
Corrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui University of Verona
Allan H. Young
Allan H. Young King's College London
Michael Bauer
Michael Bauer TU Dresden
David J. Miklowitz
David J. Miklowitz University of California, Los Angeles
Nick Freemantle
Nick Freemantle University College London
Emily A. Holmes
Emily A. Holmes Uppsala University
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare, but looking for alternative or complementary paths to studying Medicine in the USA? Today, there is a growing range of online degrees designed to help students jumpstart or advance their careers in health and medical settings.

For registered nurses seeking higher qualifications, adn to msn bridge programs provide a flexible route to a master’s degree – ideal for those with an associate degree in nursing. Many working RNs also consider accessible online rn-bsn programs without clinicals, which let them earn a bachelor’s fully online without the usual on-site clinical requirements.

Those with interests in wellness and preventative care may want to explore an online degree nutrition program, which can open doors in nutrition counseling, research, or health promotion. Aspiring healthcare leaders can prepare for management roles through some of the best online mha programs accredited by CAHME, focused on healthcare administration and strategy.

These online options allow students to balance studies with job or family commitments, making a career in healthcare more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Geddes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles