World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Toshi A. Furukawa

Toshi A. Furukawa

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7864 7393 195 186 673 45632

Toshi A. Furukawa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Toshi A. Furukawa between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Toshi A. Furukawa published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 24.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 103 publications in 2021. 53 of the 871 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 103. Peak 103 publications in 2021. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 41 publications 2018: 51 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 66 publications 2021: 103 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 61 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 52 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

871 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Toshi A. Furukawa: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 7
2002 5
2003 7
2004 6
2005 8
2006 10
2007 31
2008 19
2009 15
2010 14
2011 24
2012 24
2013 28
2014 38
2015 38
2016 39
2017 41
2018 51
2019 52
2020 66
2021 103
2022 60
2023 61
2024 52
2025 52
2026 1
Total 871
Download as CSV

Toshi A. Furukawa publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toshi A. Furukawa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 673 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 673
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Toshi A. Furukawa D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toshi A. Furukawa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 101
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Toshi A. Furukawa is affiliated with Kyoto University in Japan and is an active researcher predominantly within the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their research output reflects significant contributions to Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pharmacology.

Their scholarly work extensively covers several main topics including Mental Health Research, Treatment of Major Depression, Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Health Systems and Economic Evaluations, Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, and aspects related to Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes.

Among recent publications attributed to Furukawa are notable papers such as:

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, 2021, published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • Major depressive disorder, 2023, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta-analysis, 2021, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Furukawa frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Andrea Cipriani
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Georgia Salanti
  • Yan Luo
  • Masatsugu Sakata

Their research is regularly published in various scientific venues, with a high volume of contributions appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Toshi A Furukawa;Georgia Salanti;Anna Chaimani;Anna Chaimani;Anna Chaimani

  • The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being.

    T. A. Furukawa;R. C. Kessler;T. Slade;G. Andrews

  • Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative

    Ronald C Kessler;Jennifer Greif Green;Michael J Gruber;Nancy A. Sampson

  • The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Norito Kawakami;Mari Saitoh;Yutaka Ono

  • Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Corrado Barbui;Andrea Cipriani;Paolo Brambilla

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Kristian Thorlund;Andrew D. Oxman;Stephen D. Walter

  • Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis

    Romina Brignardello-Petersen;Ashley Bonner;Paul E Alexander;Reed A Siemieniuk

  • Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: A contribution from network meta‐analysis.

    T A Furukawa;H Noma;D M Caldwell;M Honyashiki

  • Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Hisashi Noma;Eirini Karyotaki;Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani

  • Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression

    Andrea Cipriani;Claudio Santilli;Toshi A Furukawa;Alessandra Signoretti

  • Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness.

    Yoshihiro Kinoshita;Toshi A Furukawa;Kuni Kinoshita;Mina Honyashiki

  • Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference or standardized mean difference?

    Nozomi Takeshima;Takashi Sozu;Aran Tajika;Yusuke Ogawa

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Tomofumi Miura;Hisashi Noma;Toshi A Furukawa;Hiroshi Mitsuyasu

  • Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials

    Yu Hayasaka;Marianna Purgato;Laura R Magni;Yusuke Ogawa

  • Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Andrea Cipriani;Corrado Barbui;Paolo Brambilla

  • Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression

    Norio Watanabe;Ichiro M Omori;Atsuo Nakagawa;Andrea Cipriani

  • Antidepressants plus benzodiazepines for major depression

    Toshi A Furukawa;David Streiner;L. Trevor Young;Yoshihiro Kinoshita

  • Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative: Screening for Serious Mental Illness

    Ronald C. Kessler;Jennifer Greif Green;Michael J. Gruber;Nancy A. Sampson

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Cipriani
Andrea Cipriani University of Oxford
Tatsuo Akechi
Tatsuo Akechi Nagoya City University
Stefan Leucht
Stefan Leucht Technical University of Munich
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Corrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui University of Verona
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rachel Churchill
Rachel Churchill University of York
John R. Geddes
John R. Geddes University of Oxford
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Toshinori Kitamura
Toshinori Kitamura Kitamura Institute of Mental Health Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees designed for flexibility and affordability. Many students begin their journey through nursing, with cost-effective options like the cheapest online msn programs offering graduate-level training and expanded job prospects.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, the rn to bsn cheapest programs make it easier to earn a bachelor’s degree online without breaking the bank. Those with leadership aspirations can further their credentials through doctorate in nursing education online programs, which prepare graduates for roles in academia or nursing administration.

Non-nurses interested in transitioning quickly into advanced practice roles can consider msn direct entry programs online. These pathways provide a fast track to earning a master’s degree in nursing for those without prior nursing backgrounds.

By considering these online degrees and career pathways, you can find flexible, affordable options that align with your medical ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Toshi A. Furukawa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles