World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
48230
World Ranking
9498
National Ranking
926

Andrea Cipriani publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Cipriani sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 466 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrea Cipriani D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Cipriani sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrea Cipriani is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span multiple fields, predominantly within medicine and psychology, with a focus on psychiatry, mental health, and clinical psychology. Cipriani's work centers on mental health research topics, particularly major depression treatment, with engagement in meta-analyses and systematic reviews as part of their methodological approach.

The scientist has published extensively, with notable publication venues including Evidence-Based Mental Health, BMJ Mental Health, The Lancet Psychiatry, Wellcome Open Research, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These venues reflect Cipriani's focus on evidence synthesis and clinical advancements in mental health treatment.

Major recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrea Cipriani include:

  • A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression (2020, World Psychiatry)
  • Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022, The Lancet)
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types (2021, World Psychiatry)
  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data (2021, The Lancet Psychiatry)

Cipriani frequently collaborates with a group of researchers who contribute to their work on clinical and psychological interventions. Their frequent co-authors include Toshi A. Furukawa, Georgia Salanti, Edoardo G. Ostinelli, Stefan Leucht, and Orestis Efthimiou, illustrating multidisciplinary partnerships across psychiatry and psychology.

The main fields of study for Andrea Cipriani include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Within psychology and medicine, the primary subfields of study linked to Cipriani's work are:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pharmacology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The principal research topics covered by Cipriani comprise:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Best Publications

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Toshi A Furukawa;Georgia Salanti;Anna Chaimani;Anna Chaimani;Anna Chaimani

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

    Stefan Leucht;Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Loukia Spineli;Dimitris Mavridis

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Toshiaki A Furukawa;Georgia Salanti;John R Geddes

  • Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Corrado Barbui;Andrea Cipriani;Paolo Brambilla

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Samuele Cortese;Nicoletta Adamo;Cinzia Del Giovane;Christina Mohr-Jensen

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Maximilian Huhn;Adriani Nikolakopoulou;Johannes Schneider-Thoma;Marc Krause

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    G. M. Goodwin;P. M. Haddad;I. N. Ferrier;J. K. Aronson

  • Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Julian P T Higgins;John R Geddes;Georgia Salanti

  • Lithium in the prevention of suicide in mood disorders: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani;Keith E. Hawton;Sarah Stockton;John R. Geddes

  • Lithium in the Prevention of Suicidal Behavior and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

    Andrea Cipriani;Heather Pretty;Keith E. Hawton;John R. Geddes

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.

    Andrea Cipriani;Xinyu Zhou;Cinzia Del Giovane;Sarah E Hetrick

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis

    Andrea Cipriani;Corrado Barbui;Georgia Salanti;Jennifer Rendell

  • Comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia, predictors of metabolic dysregulation, and association with psychopathology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Toby Pillinger;Toby Pillinger;Robert Ali McCutcheon;Robert Ali McCutcheon;Luke James Vano;Luke James Vano;Yuya Mizuno;Yuya Mizuno;Yuya Mizuno

  • Association of Cannabis Use in Adolescence and Risk of Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality in Young Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Gabriella Gobbi;Tobias Atkin;Tomasz Zytynski;Shouao Wang

  • Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial.

    Balance investigators;Geddes;G M Goodwin

  • Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Hisashi Noma;Eirini Karyotaki;Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani

  • Sixty Years of Placebo-Controlled Antipsychotic Drug Trials in Acute Schizophrenia: Systematic Review, Bayesian Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Efficacy Predictors

    Stefan Leucht;Claudia Leucht;Maximilian Huhn;Anna Chaimani

  • Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression

    Andrea Cipriani;Claudio Santilli;Toshi A Furukawa;Alessandra Signoretti

  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of suicide: a systematic review of observational studies

    Corrado Barbui;Eleonora Esposito;Andrea Cipriani

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Tomofumi Miura;Hisashi Noma;Toshi A Furukawa;Hiroshi Mitsuyasu

Frequent Co-Authors

Corrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui University of Verona
John R. Geddes
John R. Geddes University of Oxford
Toshi A. Furukawa
Toshi A. Furukawa Kyoto University
Stefan Leucht
Stefan Leucht Technical University of Munich
Paul J. Harrison
Paul J. Harrison University of Oxford
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
John M. Davis
John M. Davis University of Illinois at Chicago
Guy M. Goodwin
Guy M. Goodwin University of Oxford
Rachel Churchill
Rachel Churchill University of York
Julian P T Higgins
Julian P T Higgins University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways in healthcare offers greater flexibility and can help you advance your career or change specialties. With a variety of accredited programs now available, you can find options that fit your background and goals while also being mindful of cost and accessibility.

For registered nurses aiming to gain advanced skills and open up leadership roles, the cheapest dnp programs online offer a budget-friendly route to earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice. Those looking to build on their ADN can consider RN-to-BSN programs for career advancement; the rn to bsn online options make earning your bachelor's degree more accessible than ever.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor's degree and want to change your career to nursing, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors provide a fast-track option to enter the field as a master’s-prepared nurse. For those just starting out, there are also online adn programs designed to help you become a registered nurse efficiently and with flexible learning options.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Cipriani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles