World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
13040
World Ranking
7394
National Ranking
3993

Robert D. Laird publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Laird sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert D. Laird D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Laird sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert D. Laird is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. The research conducted by this scientist spans multiple domains within psychology and social sciences, with a particular focus on clinical and social psychology.

Laird's research covers various interconnected topics, including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Family and Disability Support Research

Primary fields of study in their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Subfields emphasized in their research are:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Sociology and Political Science

The scientist has published in a range of academic journals, including:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence

Significant papers authored or coauthored by Robert D. Laird are:

  • "Analytical challenges of testing hypotheses of agreement and discrepancy: Comment on Campione-Barr, Lindell, and Giron (2020)." (2020), Developmental Psychology
  • "Editorial Statement About JCCAP's 2023 Special Issue on Informant Discrepancies in Youth Mental Health Assessments: Observations, Guidelines, and Future Directions Grounded in 60 Years of Research" (2023), Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • "When Parents and Adolescents Make Discrepant Reports About Parental Monitoring: Links to Adolescent Social Anxiety When Interacting With Unfamiliar Peers" (2024), Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • "Intervention format and therapist-child agreement associated with therapeutic alliance and outcomes." (2023), Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "A Basis for Comparison: The Congruence of Mother-Teacher Ratings of Externalizing Behavior as a Function of Family Size" (2020), Journal of Child and Family Studies

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Andres De Los Reyes
  • Christine McCauley Ohannessian
  • John E. Lochman
  • Catherine C. Epkins
  • Gordon J. G. Asmundson

Best Publications

  • Developmental Trajectories of Childhood Disruptive Behaviors and Adolescent Delinquency: A Six-Site, Cross-National Study

    Lisa M. Broidy;Daniel S. Nagin;Richard E. Tremblay;John E. Bates

  • Antecedents and Behavior-Problem Outcomes of Parental Monitoring and Psychological Control in Early Adolescence

    Gregory S. Pettit;Robert D. Laird;Kenneth A. Dodge;John E. Bates

  • Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: A six-site, cross-national study.

    Unknown

  • Parents' Monitoring‐Relevant Knowledge and Adolescents' Delinquent Behavior: Evidence of Correlated Developmental Changes and Reciprocal Influences

    Robert D. Laird;Gregory S. Pettit;John E. Bates;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • Peer rejection in childhood, involvement with antisocial peers in early adolescence, and the development of externalizing behavior problems.

    Robert D. Laird;Kristi Y. Jordan;Kenneth A. Dodge;Gregory S. Pettit

  • Multidimensional latent-construct analysis of children's social information processing patterns: correlations with aggressive behavior problems.

    Kenneth A. Dodge;Robert Laird;John E. Lochman;Arnaldo Zelli

  • Testing Informant Discrepancies as Predictors of Early Adolescent Psychopathology: Why Difference Scores Cannot Tell You What You Want to Know and How Polynomial Regression May

    Robert D. Laird;Andres De Los Reyes

  • Knowledge Structures, Social Information Processing, and Children’s Aggressive Behavior

    Virginia Salzer Burks;Robert D. Laird;Kenneth A. Dodge;Gregory S. Pettit

  • Patterns of After-School Care in Middle Childhood: Risk Factors and Developmental Outcomes.

    Gregory Pettit;Robert D. Laird;Kenneth A. Dodge;John E. Bates

  • Reciprocal relations between parents' physical discipline and children's externalizing behavior during middle childhood and adolescence.

    Jennifer E. Lansford;Michael M. Criss;Robert D. Laird;Daniel S. Shaw

  • Change in Parents’ Monitoring Knowledge: Links with Parenting, Relationship Quality, Adolescent Beliefs, and Antisocial Behavior

    Robert D. Laird;Gregory S. Pettit;Kenneth A. Dodge;John E. Bates

  • The distinction between beliefs legitimizing aggression and deviant processing of social cues : Testing measurement validity and the hypothesis that biased processing mediates the effects of beliefs on aggression

    Arnaldo Zelli;Kenneth A. Dodge;John E. Lochman;Robert D. Laird

  • Considering ERP difference scores as individual difference measures: Issues with subtraction and alternative approaches.

    Alexandria Meyer;Matthew D. Lerner;Andres De Los Reyes;Robert D. Laird

  • Fraternity and Sorority Involvement, Social Influences, and Alcohol Use Among College Students: A Prospective Examination

    Christy Capone;Mark D. Wood;Brian Borsari;Robert D. Laird

  • Mothers’ and Fathers’ Autonomy-Relevant Parenting: Longitudinal Links with Adolescents’ Externalizing and Internalizing Behavior

    Jennifer E. Lansford;Robert D. Laird;Gregory S. Pettit;John E. Bates

  • Revisiting Parental Monitoring: Evidence that Parental Solicitation Can be Effective When Needed Most

    Robert D. Laird;Matthew D. Marrero;Miranda Sentse;Miranda Sentse

  • Parents' monitoring knowledge attenuates the link between antisocial friends and adolescent delinquent behavior.

    Robert D. Laird;Michael M. Criss;Gregory S. Pettit;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • Psychological control and monitoring in early adolescence: The role of parental involvement and earlier child adjustment.

    Gregory S. Pettit;Robert D. Laird

  • If it's offered, will they come? Influences on parents' participation in a community-based conduct problems prevention program.

    Joan K. Orrell-Valente;Ellen E. Pinderhughes;Ernest Valente Jr.;Robert D. Laird

  • The equivalence of regression models using difference scores and models using separate scores for each informant: implications for the study of informant discrepancies.

    Robert D. Laird;Carl F. Weems

  • Religiosity, self-control, and antisocial behavior: Religiosity as a promotive and protective factor

    Robert D. Laird;Loren D. Marks;Matthew D. Marrero

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
John E. Bates
John E. Bates Indiana University
Gregory S. Pettit
Gregory S. Pettit Auburn University
Andres De Los Reyes
Andres De Los Reyes University of Maryland, College Park
John E. Lochman
John E. Lochman University of Alabama
Arnaldo Zelli
Arnaldo Zelli University of Rome "Foro Italico"
Mark D. Wood
Mark D. Wood University of Rhode Island
Christine McCauley Ohannessian
Christine McCauley Ohannessian Florida State University
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degree and career opportunities. Many students interested in mental health or social services consider becoming social workers, as both fields emphasize helping others and require strong communication and emotional intelligence skills.

Degree requirements for social work careers vary by state. For example, social worker degree requirements in Michigan typically start with a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW), but advanced positions may need a Master's degree (MSW). If you plan to practice in Minnesota, you should review the specific social worker degree requirements in Minnesota before choosing your career or education path.

Aspiring social workers in Mississippi can find helpful guidelines on Mississippi education requirements for social workers. Similarly, those interested in this field in Missouri should consult the social worker degree requirements in Missouri.

Exploring online degree programs in Psychology or Social Work can provide flexibility and open doors to diverse career pathways in counseling, social services, and research—making it easier for students across the U.S. to meet their state’s requirements and achieve their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. Laird

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles