World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
17667
World Ranking
1782
National Ranking
752

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
17709
World Ranking
7354
National Ranking
3365

Daniel Schlenk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Schlenk sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 401 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel Schlenk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Schlenk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Daniel Schlenk is affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a specialization in subfields such as health, toxicology and mutagenesis, pollution, immunology, molecular biology, and environmental chemistry.

Their published work covers topics including environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts, toxic organic pollutants impact, effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species, fish ecology and management studies, and aquaculture disease management and microbiota.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Schlenk include:

  • Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment (2021, Environment International)
  • Degradation of contaminants of emerging concern by UV/H2O2 for water reuse: Kinetics, mechanisms, and cytotoxicity analysis (2020, Water Research)
  • Accumulation of HOCs via Precontaminated Microplastics by Earthworm Eisenia fetida in Soil (2020, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • Evidence linking exposure of fish primary macrophages to antibiotics activates the NF-kB pathway (2020, Environment International)
  • Environmentally relevant concentrations of boscalid exposure affects the neurobehavioral response of zebrafish by disrupting visual and nervous systems (2020, Journal of Hazardous Materials)

Schlenk frequently publishes in several scientific venues, including:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Aquatic Toxicology
  • Environmental Pollution

Co-authorship collaborations are notable with researchers such as:

  • Jason T. Magnuson
  • Jay Gan
  • Philip Tanabe
  • Victoria McGruer
  • Alexandria B. Boehm

In 2009, Daniel Schlenk was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • Enantioselectivity in environmental safety of current chiral insecticides

    Weiping Liu;Jianying Gan;Daniel Schlenk;William A. Jury

  • Toxicity of select beta adrenergic receptor-blocking pharmaceuticals (B-blockers) on aquatic organisms.

    D. B. Huggett;B. W. Brooks;B. Peterson;C. M. Foran

  • Benchmarking Organic Micropollutants in Wastewater, Recycled Water and Drinking Water with In Vitro Bioassays

    Beate I. Escher;Mayumi Allinson;Mayumi Allinson;Rolf Altenburger;Peter A. Bain

  • The copepod Tigriopus: a promising marine model organism for ecotoxicology and environmental genomics.

    Sheikh Raisuddin;Kevin W.H. Kwok;Kenneth M.Y. Leung;Daniel Schlenk

  • Negligible effects of microplastics on animal fitness and HOC bioaccumulation in earthworm Eisenia fetida in soil.

    Jie Wang;Jie Wang;Scott Coffin;Chengliang Sun;Daniel Schlenk

  • Target organ toxicity in marine and freshwater teleosts

    Daniel Schlenk;William H. Benson

  • Chiral pharmaceuticals: A review on their environmental occurrence and fate processes

    Edmond Sanganyado;Zhijiang Lu;Qiuguo Fu;Qiuguo Fu;Daniel Schlenk

  • Pesticides and PCBs in sediments and fish from the Salton Sea, California, USA.

    Yelena Sapozhnikova;Ola Bawardi;Daniel Schlenk

  • Determination of beta-adrenergic receptor blocking pharmaceuticals in united states wastewater effluent

    D.B Huggett;I.A Khan;C.M Foran;D Schlenk

  • Estrogenic activity and reproductive effects of the UV-filter oxybenzone (2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl-methanone) in fish

    Michael Coronado;Hector De Haro;Xin Deng;Mary Ann Rempel

  • Pyrethroid Pesticides as Endocrine Disruptors: Molecular Mechanisms in Vertebrates with a Focus on Fishes.

    Susanne M. Brander;Molly K. Gabler;Nicholas L. Fowler;Richard E. Connon

  • Biotransformation in Fishes

    Daniel Schlenk;Malin Celander;Evan Gallagher;Stephen George

  • Assessing and Reducing the Toxicity of 3D-Printed Parts

    Shirin Mesbah Oskui;Graciel Diamante;Chunyang Liao;Wei Shi

  • Effects of HCO3– on Degradation of Toxic Contaminants of Emerging Concern by UV/NO3–

    Ying Huang;Minghao Kong;Danielle Westerman;Elvis Genbo Xu

  • Enantioselectivity in estrogenic potential and uptake of bifenthrin.

    Lumei Wang;Weiping Liu;Caixia Yang;Zhiyan Pan

  • Toxicity of fipronil and its degradation products to Procambarus sp.: field and laboratory studies.

    D. Schlenk;D. B. Huggett;J. Allgood;E. Bennett

  • Evaluation of estrogenic activity from a municipal wastewater treatment plant with predominantly domestic input

    Fred Tilton;William H Benson;Daniel Schlenk

  • Alterations in physiological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with exposure to copper and copper/zinc mixtures.

    Gail M. Dethloff;Daniel Schlenk;Jonathan T. Hamm;Howard C. Bailey

  • Time- and Oil-Dependent Transcriptomic and Physiological Responses to Deepwater Horizon Oil in Mahi-Mahi (Coryphaena hippurus) Embryos and Larvae

    Elvis Genbo Xu;Edward M. Mager;Martin Grosell;Christina Pasparakis

  • The effects of copper on blood and biochemical parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

    G. M. Dethloff;D. Schlenk;S. Khan;H. C. Bailey

  • | Target Organ Toxicity in Marine and Freshwater Teleosts | Taylor & Francis Group

    Daniel Schlenk;William H. Benson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay Gan
Jay Gan University of California, Riverside
Elvis Genbo Xu
Elvis Genbo Xu University of Southern Denmark
Shane A. Snyder
Shane A. Snyder Georgia Institute of Technology
Gary Hardiman
Gary Hardiman Queen's University Belfast
Nancy D. Denslow
Nancy D. Denslow University of Florida
Keith A. Maruya
Keith A. Maruya Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Donald R. Buhler
Donald R. Buhler Oregon State University
Martin Grosell
Martin Grosell University of Miami
Michael E. Baker
Michael E. Baker University of California, San Diego
William A. Arnold
William A. Arnold University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Public administration roles focusing on environmental policy and management often benefit from enrolling in top online mpa programs. These programs equip students with leadership skills vital for navigating government and nonprofit sectors.

Another complementary pathway includes social impact and community research, where online programs like the best online bachelor degree in sociology provide a strong foundation. Sociology graduates can apply their understanding of human behavior to environmental justice and sustainability challenges.

For professionals aiming to advance in educational roles related to environmental science, pursuing doctoral degrees is increasingly accessible. Options such as edd no dissertation programs offer a flexible route to doctoral credentials without the traditional research burden.

Additionally, educators can enhance their expertise and credentials through online eds to edd bridge program pathways that streamline the transition from a master’s to a doctoral degree, helping address critical environmental education needs.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Schlenk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles