World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
7092
World Ranking
5356
National Ranking
550

Meirong Zhao publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meirong Zhao sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Meirong Zhao D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meirong Zhao sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Neonicotinoid Residues in Fruits and Vegetables: An Integrated Dietary Exposure Assessment Approach.

    Unknown

  • Enantioselectivity in environmental risk assessment of modern chiral pesticides.

    Jing Ye;Meirong Zhao;Jing Liu;Weiping Liu;Weiping Liu

  • Potential human exposures to neonicotinoid insecticides: A review.

    Q. Zhang;Z. Li;C.H. Chang;J.L. Lou

  • Enantioselective Environmental Toxicology of Chiral Pesticides

    Jing Ye;Meirong Zhao;Lili Niu;Weiping Liu

  • Risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls and heavy metals in soils of an abandoned e-waste site in China.

    Unknown

  • Enantioselectivity in estrogenic potential and uptake of bifenthrin.

    Lumei Wang;Weiping Liu;Caixia Yang;Zhiyan Pan

  • Effects of titanium dioxide nano-particles on growth and some histological parameters of zebrafish (Danio rerio) after a long-term exposure

    Unknown

  • Potential estrogenic effects of phosphorus-containing flame retardants.

    Quan Zhang;Meiya Lu;Xiaowu Dong;Cui Wang

  • Thyroid hormone-disrupting activity and ecological risk assessment of phosphorus-containing flame retardants by in vitro, in vivo and in silico approaches

    Unknown

  • Ecological risk assessment of the increasing use of the neonicotinoid insecticides along the east coast of China

    Yuanchen Chen;Lu Zang;Maodian Liu;Chunlong Zhang

  • Developmental toxicity of bifenthrin in embryo-larval stages of zebrafish

    Unknown

  • Bisphenol analogue concentrations in human breast milk and their associations with postnatal infant growth.

    Unknown

  • Resolution of the Ongoing Challenge of Estimating Nonpoint Source Neonicotinoid Pollution in the Yangtze River Basin Using a Modified Mass Balance Approach.

    Yuanchen Chen;Lu Zang;Guofeng Shen;Maodian Liu

  • Improvement of heat and drought photosynthetic tolerance in wheat by overaccumulation of glycinebetaine

    Unknown

  • Enantioselective cytotoxicity of the insecticide bifenthrin on a human amnion epithelial (FL) cell line.

    Huigang Liu;Meirong Zhao;Cong Zhang;Yun Ma

  • Integrative assessment of enantioselectivity in endocrine disruption and immunotoxicity of synthetic pyrethroids.

    Meirong Zhao;Fang Chen;Cui Wang;Quan Zhang

  • Induction of macrophage apoptosis by an organochlorine insecticide acetofenate.

    Meirong Zhao;Ying Zhang;Cui Wang;Zhengwei Fu

  • Characterization of estrogen receptor α activities in polychlorinated biphenyls by in vitro dual-luciferase reporter gene assay

    Unknown

  • Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substance concentrations in human breast milk and their associations with postnatal infant growth.

    Unknown

  • The potential endocrine disruption of pesticide transformation products (TPs): The blind spot of pesticide risk assessment.

    Chenyang Ji;Qin Song;Yuanchen Chen;Zhiqiang Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Weiping Liu
Weiping Liu Zhejiang University
Yuanchen Chen
Yuanchen Chen Zhejiang University of Technology
Guofeng Shen
Guofeng Shen Peking University
Peng Xu
Peng Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Da Chen
Da Chen Jinan University
Xuejun Wang
Xuejun Wang Peking University
Shu Tao
Shu Tao Peking University
Jay Gan
Jay Gan University of California, Riverside
Daniel Schlenk
Daniel Schlenk University of California, Riverside
Kai Liu
Kai Liu Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields like public administration, sociology, and education. For professionals seeking advanced skills quickly, exploring a 1 year mpa online program can be a strategic choice, blending environmental policy with management expertise.

Understanding society and human behavior is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. Pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs provides foundational knowledge that complements environmental science, enhancing careers in community development and sustainability.

For those aiming to lead research or influence policy at the highest level, doctoral studies are essential. Online options like online doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexibility without the traditional dissertation hurdle, making advanced education more accessible.

Additionally, educators can advance their expertise through some of the best online eds to edd programs, blending environmental education with leadership skills. These pathways enable diverse career growth aligned with the evolving demands of environmental science.

Best Scientists Citing Meirong Zhao

Recently Published Articles