World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
31968
World Ranking
10097
National Ranking
5200

John S. Najarian publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Najarian sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 624 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John S. Najarian D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Najarian sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John S. Najarian is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with a significant emphasis on oncology and transplantation within this broader field.

Najarian's work spans several specific topics related to medical outcomes and diseases, including:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Viral-associated cancers and disorders

Their publication record includes contributions to the following venues:

  • Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences

Among recent papers, Najarian has contributed to the article titled "Long-Term Outcomes in 831 Kidney Transplant Recipients with 20 Years of Graft Function," published in 2021 in the Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences.

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Raja Kandaswamy
  • Hassan N. Ibrahim
  • Arthur J. Matas
  • Varvara A. Kirchner
  • Kristen J. Gillingham

Best Publications

  • Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution.

    David Sutherland;Rainer Gruessner;David Dunn;Arthur Matas

  • Transplantation of discordant xenografts: a review of progress.

    Jeffrey L Platt;Gregory M Vercellotti;Agustin P Dalmasso;Agustin P Dalmasso;Arthur J Matas

  • Epstein-Barr virus-induced B-cell lymphoma after renal transplantation: acyclovir therapy and transition from polyclonal to monoclonal B-cell proliferation.

    D. W. Hanto;G. Frizzera;K. J. Gajl-Peczalska;K. Sakamoto

  • The impact of an acute rejection episode on long-term renal allograft survival (t1/2).

    Arthue J. Matas;Kristen J. Gillingham;William D. Payne;John S. Najarian

  • Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation: A multivariate analysis

    Christoph Troppmann;K. J. Gillingham;E. Benedetti;P. S. Almond

  • Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) induced polyclonal and monoclonal B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases occurring after renal transplantation. Clinical, pathologic, and virologic findings and implications for therapy.

    Douglas W. Hanto;Kazimiera J. Gajl-peczalska;Glauco Frizzera;Diane C. Arthur

  • Clinical Spectrum of Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Renal Transplant Recipients and Evidence for the Role of Epstein-Barr Virus

    Douglas W. Hanto;Glauco Frizzera;David T. Purtilo;Kiyoshi Sakamoto

  • Effects of Pancreatic Transplantation on Diabetic Neuropathy

    William R. Kennedy;Xavier Navarro;Frederick C. Goetz;David E.R. Sutherland

  • Progression of diabetic retinopathy after pancreas transplantation for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    R. C. Ramsay;F. C. Goetz;D. E. R. Sutherland;S. M. Mauer

  • RECURRENCE OF IDIOPATHIC NEPHROTIC SYNDROME AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION

    John R. Hoyer;Leopoldo Raij;Robert L. Vernier;Richard L. Simmons

  • Pancreatic islet cell transplantation.

    David E.R. Sutherland;Arthur J. Matas;John S. Najarian

  • Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy.

    Eric M. Johnson;Michael J. Remucal;Kristen J. Gillingham;Rachel A. Dahms

  • Liver allograft rejection. An analysis of the use of biopsy in determining outcome of rejection.

    Dale C. Snover;Deborah K. Freese;Harvey L. Sharp;Joseph R. Bloomer

  • Studies of the rate of regression of the glomerular lesions in diabetic rats treated with pancreatic islet transplantation.

    Mauer Sm;Steffes Mw;Sutherland De;Najarian-S

  • Autologous islet transplantation to prevent diabetes after pancreatic resection.

    D C Wahoff;B E Papalois;J S Najarian;D M Kendall

  • The impact of cyclosporine and combination immunosuppression on the incidence of posttransplant diabetes in renal allograft recipients.

    J. P. Boudreaux;L. Mchugh;D. M. Canafax;N. Ascher

  • 2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience.

    Arthur J. Matas;William D. Payne;David E. R. Sutherland;Abhi Humar

  • Association of renal allograft rejection with virus infections

    Carlos Lopez;Richard L. Simmons;S.Michael Mauer;John S. Najarian

  • An immunospecific microbalance

    Alan Shons;Frank Dorman;John Najarian

  • Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Pathological Study of 63 Serial Liver Biopsies from 17 Patients with Special Reference to the Diagnostic Features and Natural History of Rejection†

    Dale C. Snover;Richard K. Sibley;Deborah K. Freese;Harvey L. Sharp

Frequent Co-Authors

David E.R. Sutherland
David E.R. Sutherland University of Minnesota
Richard L. Simmons
Richard L. Simmons University of Pittsburgh
Arthur J. Matas
Arthur J. Matas University of Minnesota
Nancy L. Ascher
Nancy L. Ascher University of California, San Francisco
Henry H. Balfour
Henry H. Balfour University of Minnesota
Michael W. Steffes
Michael W. Steffes University of Minnesota
Phillip K. Peterson
Phillip K. Peterson University of Minnesota
Alfred F. Michael
Alfred F. Michael University of Minnesota
Shimon Slavin
Shimon Slavin Hebrew University of Jerusalem
John H. Kersey
John H. Kersey University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine often opens doors to a wide range of online degrees tailored to healthcare professionals at various stages. Many students interested in preventative care and healthy lifestyles may consider enrolling in one of the best online nutrition degree programs. These courses are ideal for those aiming to integrate nutrition expertise with medical training.

For professionals seeking leadership roles in healthcare administration, pursuing one of the best mha programs ensures a strong foundation in healthcare management and policy, particularly through CAHME-accredited options.

Registered Nurses aspiring to advance without extensive in-person requirements might be interested in rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited pathways. These flexible programs remove clinical obligations while supporting career growth.

Additionally, those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice can explore the fastest dnp online program options, allowing for accelerated advancement in various healthcare specialties.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Najarian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles