World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
57
Citations
26907
World Ranking
1399
National Ranking
365

William T. Pockman publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William T. Pockman sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 134 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

William T. Pockman D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William T. Pockman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

William T. Pockman is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a significant emphasis on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Atmospheric Science. Their work also spans Ecology and Mechanical Engineering subfields.

The scientist's main research topics include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Tree-ring Climate Responses, and Forest Ecology and Management. Further areas of study cover Tree Root and Stability Studies, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Forest Insect Ecology and Management.

William T. Pockman has contributed to multiple recent academic papers, including the following:

  • Divergent responses of primary production to increasing precipitation variability in global drylands, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Carbon starvation following a decade of experimental drought consumes old reserves in Pinus edulis, 2023, New Phytologist
  • Distinct xylem responses to acute vs prolonged drought in pine trees, 2020, Tree Physiology
  • A 3-dimensional model of Pinus edulis and Juniperus monosperma root distributions in New Mexico: implications for soil water dynamics, 2020, Plant and Soil
  • State changes: insights from the U.S. Long Term Ecological Research Network, 2021, Ecosphere

Frequent coauthors of William T. Pockman include:

  • M. E. Litvak
  • Scott L. Collins
  • Yiqi Luo
  • C. David McIntire
  • Jennifer A. Rudgers

The scientist has published repeatedly in several scholarly venues, including:

  • New Phytologist
  • Ecosphere
  • Biogeosciences
  • Global Change Biology
  • Tree Physiology

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?

    Nate G. McDowell;William T. Pockman;Craig D. Allen;David D. Breshears

  • Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure

    Uwe G. Hacke;John S. Sperry;William T. Pockman;Stephen D. Davis

  • Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency

    Travis E. Huxman;Melinda D. Smith;Melinda D. Smith;Philip A. Fay;Alan K. Knapp

  • Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems

    Travis E. Huxman;Keirith A. Snyder;David Tissue;A. Joshua Leffler

  • Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands.

    Robert B. Jackson;Jay L. Banner;Esteban G. Jobbágy;William T. Pockman;William T. Pockman

  • A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality

    Henry D. Adams;Melanie J.B. Zeppel;Melanie J.B. Zeppel;William R.L. Anderegg;Henrik Hartmann

  • Assessing the Response of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Potential Changes in Precipitation

    Jake F. Weltzin;Michael E. Loik;Susanne Schwinning;David G. Williams

  • ECOHYDROLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF WOODY PLANT ENCROACHMENT

    Travis E. Huxman;Bradford P. Wilcox;David D. Breshears;Russell L. Scott

  • How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses

    Sanna Sevanto;Nate G. Mcdowell;L. Turin Dickman;Robert Pangle

  • ADAPTIVE VARIATION IN THE VULNERABILITY OF WOODY PLANTS TO XYLEM CAVITATION

    Hafiz Maherali;William T. Pockman;Robert B. Jackson

  • Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran Desert vegetation

    William T. Pockman;John S. Sperry

  • Tree die-off in response to global change-type drought: mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements.

    David D Breshears;Orrin B Myers;Clifton W Meyer;Fairley J Barnes

  • Evaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework

    Nate G. McDowell;Rosie A. Fisher;Chonggang Xu;J. C. Domec;J. C. Domec

  • Multi-scale predictions of massive conifer mortality due to chronic temperature rise

    Nathan G. McDowell;A.P. Williams;A.P. Williams;C. Xu;W. T. Pockman

  • Limitation of transpiration by hydraulic conductance and xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis

    J. S. Sperry;W. T. Pockman

  • Sustained and significant negative water pressure in xylem

    William T. Pockman;John S. Sperry;James W. O'Leary

  • Use of centrifugal force in the study of xylem cavitation

    N.N. Alder;W.T. Pockman;J.S. Sperry;S. Nuismer

  • Drought consistently alters the composition of soil fungal and bacterial communities in grasslands from two continents.

    Raúl Ochoa-Hueso;Scott L. Collins;Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo;Kelly Hamonts

  • Root and stem xylem embolism, stomatal conductance, and leaf turgor in Acer grandidentatum populations along a soil moisture gradient

    N. N. Alder;J. S. Sperry;W. T. Pockman

  • Variation in xylem structure and function in stems and roots of trees to 20 m depth

    Andrew J. McElrone;William T. Pockman;Jordi Martínez‐Vilalta;Robert B. Jackson

  • Ecosystem rooting depth determined with caves and DNA

    R. B. Jackson;L. A. Moore;W. A. Hoffmann;W. T. Pockman

Frequent Co-Authors

Nate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Scott L. Collins
Scott L. Collins University of New Mexico
John S. Sperry
John S. Sperry University of Utah
Jean-Marc Limousin
Jean-Marc Limousin Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marcy E. Litvak
Marcy E. Litvak University of New Mexico
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Sanna Sevanto
Sanna Sevanto Los Alamos National Laboratory
Robert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson Stanford University
Melinda D. Smith
Melinda D. Smith Colorado State University
Eric E. Small
Eric E. Small University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing William T. Pockman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles