World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
VIEW LIST
Sanna Sevanto

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 54 1690 1548 449 392 133 11282

Sanna Sevanto publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sanna Sevanto between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sanna Sevanto published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2023. 9 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2023. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
2000 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sanna Sevanto: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 11
2010 4
2011 5
2012 3
2013 7
2014 6
2015 6
2016 7
2017 14
2018 15
2019 13
2020 6
2021 13
2022 9
2023 33
2024 5
2025 4
Total 178
Download as CSV

Sanna Sevanto publications per year - data summary

  • Sanna Sevanto, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, has 178 publications recorded across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 33 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2002 and 2004, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 26 years in the span carries no publications at all (2007).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.1 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 64 publications, 36% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 17 publications (1.9 per year); 2009-2017: 63 publications (7.0 per year); 2018-2025: 98 publications (12.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Sanna Sevanto publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanna Sevanto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–135 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 133 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201 133
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Sanna Sevanto publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 88 ranges running from 36–40 to 467+ publications.
  • Sanna Sevanto, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 133 publications - the 48th percentile of the discipline.
  • 48% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than Sanna Sevanto, and about 52% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 136–140 publications range, and Sanna Sevanto ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 111–115 publications, holding 255 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 55% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 141–145 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 467 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Sanna Sevanto D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanna Sevanto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98 54
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Sanna Sevanto D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 80 ranges running from 30 to 109+ D-Index.
  • Sanna Sevanto, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from Los Alamos National Laboratory, records 54 D-Index - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than Sanna Sevanto, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Sanna Sevanto ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 288 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 66% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Sanna Sevanto mainly focuses on Xylem, Ecology, Transpiration, Phloem and Hydraulic conductivity. Her Ecology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Atmospheric sciences and Cell biology. Her Transpiration study combines topics in areas such as Carbon sink and Taiga.

Her study with Phloem involves better knowledge in Botany. Sanna Sevanto has included themes like Volumetric flow rate and Tension in her Hydraulic conductivity study. Her Agronomy research focuses on subjects like Photosynthesis, which are linked to Pinus edulis and Respiration.

Her most cited work include:

  • How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses (411 citations)
  • A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality (351 citations)
  • Evaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework (269 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Atmospheric sciences, Botany, Xylem, Ecology and Transpiration are her primary areas of study. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Atmosphere, Soil water, Canopy, Climate model and Carbon cycle. Her Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cavitation and Agronomy.

Her study in Agronomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Pinus edulis and Turgor pressure. She interconnects Volumetric flow rate, Tension, Scots pine, Hydraulic conductivity and Phloem in the investigation of issues within Xylem. Her work investigates the relationship between Transpiration and topics such as Soil science that intersect with problems in Leaf size.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (26.55%)
  • Botany (28.32%)
  • Xylem (25.66%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Ecosystem (8.85%)
  • Ecology (18.58%)
  • Agronomy (14.16%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecosystem, Ecology, Agronomy, Phloem and Abundance. Her research investigates the connection between Ecosystem and topics such as Microcosm that intersect with problems in Plant litter. Her work on Climate change as part of general Ecology study is frequently linked to Microbiome, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Her research integrates issues of Carbon cycle, Vegetation, Greenhouse gas and Biogeochemistry in her study of Climate change. Her Agronomy research includes elements of Photosynthesis, Interspecific competition, Moisture and Water resources. In the field of Phloem, her study on Phloem transport overlaps with subjects such as Schmidt number.

Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Increasing impacts of extreme droughts on vegetation productivity under climate change (33 citations)
  • Drought impacts on tree phloem: from cell-level responses to ecological significance. (19 citations)
  • Plant-microbe interactions before drought influence plant physiological responses to subsequent severe drought. (14 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Carbon dioxide

Her primary areas of investigation include Transpiration, Competition, Precipitation, Water use and Stomatal conductance. Sanna Sevanto conducts interdisciplinary study in the fields of Transpiration and Optimality principle through her research. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Juniperus monosperma, Juniper, Pinus edulis and Horticulture.

She has researched Stomatal conductance in several fields, including Turgor pressure, Water content, Acclimatization, Woodland and Drought tolerance. Sanna Sevanto focuses mostly in the field of Turgor pressure, narrowing it down to topics relating to Agronomy and, in certain cases, Photosynthesis. Her work deals with themes such as Vegetation, Atmospheric sciences, Carbon cycle and Greenhouse gas, which intersect with Soil water.

Best Publications

  • A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality

    Henry D. Adams;Melanie J.B. Zeppel;Melanie J.B. Zeppel;William R.L. Anderegg;Henrik Hartmann

  • How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses

    Sanna Sevanto;Nate G. Mcdowell;L. Turin Dickman;Robert Pangle

  • Increasing Impacts of Extreme Droughts on Vegetation Productivity Under Climate Change

    Chonggang Xu;Nate G. McDowell;Rosie A. Fisher;Liang Wei;Liang Wei

  • Evaluating theories of drought‐induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel–experiment framework

    Nate G. McDowell;Rosie A. Fisher;Chonggang Xu;J. C. Domec;J. C. Domec

  • Multi-scale predictions of massive conifer mortality due to chronic temperature rise

    Nathan G. McDowell;A.P. Williams;A.P. Williams;C. Xu;W. T. Pockman

  • Phloem transport and drought.

    Sanna A. Sevanto

  • Leaf litter decomposition-Estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model

    Mikko Tuomi;Mikko Tuomi;T. Thum;H. Järvinen;S. Fronzek

  • The influence of leaf size and shape on leaf thermal dynamics: does theory hold up under natural conditions?

    Andrea Leigh;S. Sevanto;John Close;Adrienne Nicotra

  • The mechanisms of carbon starvation: how, when, or does it even occur at all?

    Nate G. McDowell;Sanna Sevanto

  • Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis

    T. Hölttä;T. Vesala;S. Sevanto;S. Sevanto;M. Perämäki

  • Allocation, stress tolerance and carbon transport in plants: how does phloem physiology affect plant ecology?

    Jessica A. Savage;Michael J. Clearwater;Dustin F. Haines;Tamir Klein

  • Linking hydraulic traits to tropical forest function in a size-structured and trait-driven model (TFS v.1-Hydro)

    Bradley O. Christoffersen;Bradley O. Christoffersen;Manuel Gloor;Sophie Fauset;Nikolaos M. Fyllas

  • Effect of thinning on surface fluxes in a boreal forest

    Timo Vesala;Tanja Suni;Üllar Rannik;Petri Keronen

  • Warming combined with more extreme precipitation regimes modifies the water sources used by trees.

    Charlotte Grossiord;Sanna Sevanto;Todd E. Dawson;Henry D. Adams

  • Assimilate transport in phloem sets conditions for leaf gas exchange.

    Eero Nikinmaa;Teemu Hölttä;Pertti Hari;Pasi Kolari

  • Do thick leaves avoid thermal damage in critically low wind speeds

    Andrea Leigh;S Sevanto;Marilyn Ball;John Close

  • Tree stem diameter variations and transpiration in Scots pine: an analysis using a dynamic sap flow model.

    Martti Perämäki;Eero Nikinmaa;Sanna Sevanto;Hannu Ilvesniemi

  • Dynamics of leaf water relations components in co‐occurring iso‐ and anisohydric conifer species

    Frederick C. Meinzer;David R. Woodruff;Danielle E. Marias;Katherine A. Mcculloh

  • Effects of the hydraulic coupling between xylem and phloem on diurnal phloem diameter variation

    Sanna Sevanto;Teemu Hölttä;N. Michele Holbrook

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of CO2 in relation to climate: a cross-biome analysis across multiple time scales

    P. C. Stoy;P. C. Stoy;A. D. Richardson;D. D. Baldocchi;G. G. Katul

  • Time lags for xylem and stem diameter variations in a Scots pine tree

    Sanna Sevanto;Timo Vesala;Martti Kimmo Perämäki;Eero Nikinmaa

  • Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation

    NúRIA Garcia-Forner;Henry D. Adams;Sanna Sevanto;Adam D. Collins

  • Wintertime photosynthesis and water uptake in a boreal forest.

    Sanna Sevanto;Tanja Suni;Jukka Pumpanen;Tiia Grönholm

Frequent Co-Authors

Nate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Teemu Hölttä
Teemu Hölttä University of Helsinki
Eero Nikinmaa
Eero Nikinmaa University of Helsinki
William T. Pockman
William T. Pockman University of New Mexico
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Maurizio Mencuccini
Maurizio Mencuccini Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications
Chonggang Xu
Chonggang Xu Los Alamos National Laboratory
Henry D. Adams
Henry D. Adams Washington State University
Pertti Hari
Pertti Hari University of Helsinki

External Links

Personal website of Sanna Sevanto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sanna Sevanto

Nate G. McDowell

Nate G. McDowell

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Publications: 80

Markku Kulmala

Markku Kulmala

University of Helsinki

Publications: 68

Timo Vesala

Timo Vesala

University of Helsinki

Publications: 56

Patrick Meir

Patrick Meir

University of Edinburgh

Publications: 52

Kathy Steppe

Kathy Steppe

Ghent University

Publications: 52

Arthur Gessler

Arthur Gessler

ETH Zurich

Publications: 50

Teemu Hölttä

Teemu Hölttä

University of Helsinki

Publications: 49

William R. L. Anderegg

William R. L. Anderegg

University of Utah

Publications: 48

Jordi Martínez-Vilalta

Jordi Martínez-Vilalta

Autonomous University of Barcelona

Publications: 45

Maurizio Mencuccini

Maurizio Mencuccini

Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications

Publications: 44

Pasi Kolari

Pasi Kolari

University of Helsinki

Publications: 41

Jean-Christophe Domec

Jean-Christophe Domec

Bordeaux Sciences Agro

Publications: 40

J. Julio Camarero

J. Julio Camarero

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 39

David T. Tissue

David T. Tissue

Western Sydney University

Publications: 33

Jaana Bäck

Jaana Bäck

University of Helsinki

Publications: 32

Belinda E. Medlyn

Belinda E. Medlyn

Western Sydney University

Publications: 31

Trending Scientists

L. Pondrom

L. Pondrom

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Martine Peeters

Martine Peeters

Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

Claire E. Hulsebosch

Claire E. Hulsebosch

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Martin Kircher

Martin Kircher

Charité - University Medicine Berlin

Tom W. Muir

Tom W. Muir

Princeton University

Stanley Stein

Stanley Stein

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Alan R. Burns

Alan R. Burns

University of Houston

Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen

Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen

Delft University of Technology

Traci C. Green

Traci C. Green

Brown University

Damian F. J. Purcell

Damian F. J. Purcell

University of Melbourne

Michael Rosenblum

Michael Rosenblum

University of Potsdam

Stefano Ermon

Stefano Ermon

Stanford University

Wei Liu

Wei Liu

University of Technology Sydney

Stein T. Holden

Stein T. Holden

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

Hans L. Tillmann

Hans L. Tillmann

East Carolina University

Peter M. van Bodegom

Peter M. van Bodegom

Leiden University

Related Plant Science and Agronomy Rankings & Guides

2027 Best Certification Programs for Careers That Pay Well

2027 Best Certification Programs for Careers That Pay Well
2027 Best Accelerated Online Associate Degree Programs

2027 Best Accelerated Online Associate Degree Programs
2027 Best 6 Month Certificate Programs That Pay Well

2027 Best 6 Month Certificate Programs That Pay Well
2027 Best Online Degrees for Felons with Records

2027 Best Online Degrees for Felons with Records
2027 Best Degrees for Remote Work

2027 Best Degrees for Remote Work
2027 Most In-Demand Education Careers

2027 Most In-Demand Education Careers
2027 Best College Majors to Pursue: Salary & Job Growth Data

2027 Best College Majors to Pursue: Salary & Job Growth Data
2027 Best Degrees to Get: Popular Majors That Guarantee High Salary

2027 Best Degrees to Get: Popular Majors That Guarantee High Salary
2027 Online Philosophy Degree Programs Costs: Tuition & Fees

2027 Online Philosophy Degree Programs Costs: Tuition & Fees
2027 Accelerated Online Degree Programs for Working Adults

2027 Accelerated Online Degree Programs for Working Adults
2027 Best Online Degrees for Seniors

2027 Best Online Degrees for Seniors
2027 Easiest College Majors & Their Career Paths

2027 Easiest College Majors & Their Career Paths
2027 Cost of Online Education vs. Traditional Education

2027 Cost of Online Education vs. Traditional Education
2027 Competency-Based Degrees and Programs

2027 Competency-Based Degrees and Programs
2027 Best Online Colleges for Military Spouses & Dependents

2027 Best Online Colleges for Military Spouses & Dependents
2027 Quick-to-Learn Trade Jobs That Pay Well

2027 Quick-to-Learn Trade Jobs That Pay Well
2027 Colleges Offering 6-Week Online Courses

2027 Colleges Offering 6-Week Online Courses
2027 Best Accredited Online Bachelor's Degree Programs

2027 Best Accredited Online Bachelor's Degree Programs
2027 Best Part-Time Ph.D. Programs

2027 Best Part-Time Ph.D. Programs
2027 Best 6 Month Online Master's Degree Programs

2027 Best 6 Month Online Master's Degree Programs
2027 Best Online Degrees for Moms

2027 Best Online Degrees for Moms

Recently Published Articles

2027 Is Business Administration a Hard Major? What Students Should Know

2027 Is Business Administration a Hard Major? What Students Should Know
2027 BCBA Credential Timeline From Bachelor's to Certification

2027 BCBA Credential Timeline From Bachelor's to Certification
2027 Highest-Paying Jobs You Can Get With a Biomedical Sciences Degree

2027 Highest-Paying Jobs You Can Get With a Biomedical Sciences Degree
2027 How to Become a Curriculum Developer: Education, Salary, and Job Outlook

2027 How to Become a Curriculum Developer: Education, Salary, and Job Outlook
2027 Last-Minute Admissions: Online Accounting Degree Master's Programs Still Accepting Students

2027 Last-Minute Admissions: Online Accounting Degree Master's Programs Still Accepting Students
2027 How to Become an LPN in Mississippi

2027 How to Become an LPN in Mississippi
2027 Fastest Online Sustainability Degree Programs You Can Finish in Under 2 Years

2027 Fastest Online Sustainability Degree Programs You Can Finish in Under 2 Years
2027 Best Nursing Schools in Charlotte, NC – Accredited Nursing Degree Programs Online

2027 Best Nursing Schools in Charlotte, NC – Accredited Nursing Degree Programs Online
2027 How to Become a Forensic Scientist in Colorado

2027 How to Become a Forensic Scientist in Colorado
2027 Hospice & Palliative Care Social Work Careers: Guide to Career Paths, Options & Salary

2027 Hospice & Palliative Care Social Work Careers: Guide to Career Paths, Options & Salary
2027 Forensic Psychology Student Debt Report: Borrowing, Monthly Payments, and Repayment Risk

2027 Forensic Psychology Student Debt Report: Borrowing, Monthly Payments, and Repayment Risk
2027 Most In-Demand Human Services Master's Specializations

2027 Most In-Demand Human Services Master's Specializations
2027 Online EdD Programs with an All But Dissertation (ABD) Option

2027 Online EdD Programs with an All But Dissertation (ABD) Option
2027 Creative Writing Careers Most Resilient to AI Disruption

2027 Creative Writing Careers Most Resilient to AI Disruption
2027 Fastest Online Teaching Degree Programs You Can Finish in Under 2 Years

2027 Fastest Online Teaching Degree Programs You Can Finish in Under 2 Years
2027 How to Become an Architectural Project Manager: Education, Salary, and Job Outlook

2027 How to Become an Architectural Project Manager: Education, Salary, and Job Outlook
2027 Military-Friendly Online Criminal Justice Bachelor's Degree Programs

2027 Military-Friendly Online Criminal Justice Bachelor's Degree Programs
2027 How to Become a Production Manager: Education, Salary, and Job Outlook

2027 How to Become a Production Manager: Education, Salary, and Job Outlook
2027 How to Become a Marriage and Family Therapist in North Carolina: Requirements & Certification

2027 How to Become a Marriage and Family Therapist in North Carolina: Requirements & Certification
2027 Easiest Online Healthcare Administration Master's Degree Programs That Pay Well: High-Salary Degrees with Simple Admissions

2027 Easiest Online Healthcare Administration Master's Degree Programs That Pay Well: High-Salary Degrees with Simple Admissions
2027 How Much Does a Game Programming Degree Program Cost? Tuition, Fees & Total Expense Breakdown

2027 How Much Does a Game Programming Degree Program Cost? Tuition, Fees & Total Expense Breakdown