World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
65
Citations
12888
World Ranking
946
National Ranking
5

Eero Nikinmaa publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eero Nikinmaa sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 188 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Eero Nikinmaa D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eero Nikinmaa sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

His primary areas of investigation include Scots pine, Atmospheric sciences, Botany, Xylem and Transpiration. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Photosynthesis and Ecology, Growing season. His study in Atmospheric sciences is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Atmosphere, Eddy covariance, Soil water, Carbon dioxide and Taiga.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Canopy and Forest ecology. His Botany study frequently links to other fields, such as Biological system. Eero Nikinmaa has researched Xylem in several fields, including Hydraulic conductivity and Phloem.

His most cited work include:

  • CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database (718 citations)
  • Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations: SMEAR (433 citations)
  • Air temperature triggers the recovery of evergreen boreal forest photosynthesis in spring (255 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Scots pine, Botany, Atmospheric sciences, Xylem and Photosynthesis. His work in Scots pine addresses issues such as Ecology, which are connected to fields such as Area ratio. His Botany study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Horticulture.

His Atmospheric sciences research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Atmosphere, Eddy covariance, Growing season, Carbon dioxide and Taiga. His research investigates the connection with Xylem and areas like Transpiration which intersect with concerns in Hydrology and Hydraulic conductivity. His Photosynthesis study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Soil water, Chlorophyll and Sink.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Scots pine (29.76%)
  • Botany (29.76%)
  • Atmospheric sciences (23.21%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2017)?

  • Atmospheric sciences (23.21%)
  • Taiga (9.52%)
  • Scots pine (29.76%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Eero Nikinmaa mainly focuses on Atmospheric sciences, Taiga, Scots pine, Botany and Photosynthesis. His studies in Atmospheric sciences integrate themes in fields like Boreal, Eddy covariance, Carbon dioxide and Volatile organic compound. Eero Nikinmaa interconnects Agroforestry, Mire, Radiative forcing, Forest floor and Ecotone in the investigation of issues within Taiga.

Eero Nikinmaa combines subjects such as Ecology, Interspecific competition, Agronomy, Hydraulic conductivity and Trait with his study of Scots pine. His Botany study often links to related topics such as Horticulture. The Photosynthetic capacity research Eero Nikinmaa does as part of his general Photosynthesis study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Scientific method, Cover and Water transport, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.

Between 2011 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations: SMEAR (433 citations)
  • Physiology of the seasonal relationship between the photochemical reflectance index and photosynthetic light use efficiency (98 citations)
  • Seasonal and annual variation of carbon dioxide surface fluxes in Helsinki, Finland, in 2006–2010 (69 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

His primary areas of investigation include Ecosystem, Hydrology, Scots pine, Botany and Soil science. Many of his research projects under Ecosystem are closely connected to Service with Service, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. Eero Nikinmaa works mostly in the field of Hydrology, limiting it down to topics relating to Vegetation and, in certain cases, Water quality, Stormwater, Urban forest, Prevailing winds and Eddy covariance.

His study looks at the relationship between Scots pine and fields such as Ecology, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Botany study frequently involves adjacent topics like Horticulture. His Soil science research includes themes of Organic matter, Volatile organic compound and Taiga.

Best Publications

  • CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Sebastiaan Luyssaert;I. Inglima;M. Jung;A. D. Richardson

  • Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations: SMEAR

    Pertti Hari;Eero Nikinmaa;Toivo Pohja;Erkki Siivola

  • Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe

    Jordi Martinez-Vilalta;Jordi Martinez-Vilalta;Hervé Cochard;Hervé Cochard;Maurizia Mencuccini;Frank Sterck

  • Air temperature triggers the recovery of evergreen boreal forest photosynthesis in spring

    Suni Tanja;Frank Berninger;Timo Vesala;Tiina Markkanen

  • LIGNUM: A Tree Model Based on Simple Structural Units

    J. Perttunen;R. Siev Änen;E. Nikinmaa;H. Salminen

  • Components of functional-structural tree models

    Risto Sievänen;Eero Nikinmaa;Pekka Nygren;Harry Ozier-Lafontaine

  • Modeling xylem and phloem water flows in trees according to cohesion theory and Münch hypothesis

    T. Hölttä;T. Vesala;S. Sevanto;S. Sevanto;M. Perämäki

  • LIGNUM: a model combining the structure and the functioning of trees

    J Perttunen;R Sievänen;E Nikinmaa

  • Effect of thinning on surface fluxes in a boreal forest

    Timo Vesala;Tanja Suni;Üllar Rannik;Petri Keronen

  • Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity in Scots pine to the annual cycle of temperature.

    Annikki Mäkelä;Pertti Hari;Frank Berninger;Heikki Hänninen

  • Long-term field measurements of atmosphere-surface interactions in boreal forest combining forest ecology, micrometeorology, aerosol physics and atmospheric chemistry

    Timo Vesala;Jyrki Haataja;Pasi Pekka Aalto;Nuria Altimir

  • Linking phloem function to structure: Analysis with a coupled xylem–phloem transport model

    T. Holtta;Maurizio Mencuccini;E. Nikinmaa

  • Assimilate transport in phloem sets conditions for leaf gas exchange.

    Eero Nikinmaa;Teemu Hölttä;Pertti Hari;Pasi Kolari

  • Above‐ground woody carbon sequestration measured from tree rings is coherent with net ecosystem productivity at five eddy‐covariance sites

    Flurin Babst;Olivier Bouriaud;Dario Papale;Bert Gielen

  • Forest floor vegetation plays an important role in photosynthetic production of boreal forests

    Pasi Kolari;Jukka Pumpanen;Liisa Kulmala;Hannu Ilvesniemi

  • Developing an empirical model of stand GPP with the LUE approach: analysis of eddy covariance data at five contrasting conifer sites in Europe

    Annikki Mäkelä;Minna Pulkkinen;Pasi Kolari;Fredrik Lagergren

  • Surface-atmosphere interactions over complex urban terrain in Helsinki, Finland

    Timo Vesala;Leena Järvi;Samuli Launiainen;Andrei Sogachev

  • Tree stem diameter variations and transpiration in Scots pine: an analysis using a dynamic sap flow model.

    Martti Perämäki;Eero Nikinmaa;Sanna Sevanto;Hannu Ilvesniemi

  • Capacitive effect of cavitation in xylem conduits: results from a dynamic model.

    Teemu Hölttä;Herve Cochard;Eero Nikinmaa;Maurizio Mencuccini

  • Time lags for xylem and stem diameter variations in a Scots pine tree

    Sanna Sevanto;Timo Vesala;Martti Kimmo Perämäki;Eero Nikinmaa

  • Physiology of the seasonal relationship between the photochemical reflectance index and photosynthetic light use efficiency

    Albert Porcar-Castell;José Ignacio Garcia-Plazaola;Caroline J. Nichol;Pasi Kolari

  • Patterns of above- and below-ground response of understory conifer release 6 years after partial cutting

    Daniel D Kneeshaw;Harry Williams;Eero Nikinmaa;Christian Messier

  • Seasonal and annual variation of carbon dioxide surface fluxes in Helsinki, Finland, in 2006–2010

    L. Järvi;A. Nordbo;H. Junninen;A. Riikonen

  • Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech.

    Christian Messier;Eero Nikinmaa

Frequent Co-Authors

Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Pertti Hari
Pertti Hari University of Helsinki
Pasi Kolari
Pasi Kolari University of Helsinki
Teemu Hölttä
Teemu Hölttä University of Helsinki
Jukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen University of Eastern Finland
Frank Berninger
Frank Berninger University of Eastern Finland
Annikki Mäkelä
Annikki Mäkelä University of Helsinki
Jaana Bäck
Jaana Bäck University of Helsinki
Sanna Sevanto
Sanna Sevanto Los Alamos National Laboratory
Hannu Ilvesniemi
Hannu Ilvesniemi Finnish Forest Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Eero Nikinmaa

Recently Published Articles