World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5978
World Ranking
10785
National Ranking
521

Joris Lammers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joris Lammers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joris Lammers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joris Lammers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joris Lammers is affiliated with the University of Cologne in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of social sciences and psychology. Their work encompasses a significant number of publications across various subfields, including sociology and political science, social psychology, gender studies, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research topics focus on social and intergroup psychology, nostalgia and consumer behavior, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, death anxiety and social exclusion, cultural differences and values, gender diversity and inequality, and challenges related to work-family balance.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Joris Lammers are:

  • Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right-wing populist rhetoric (2020, European Journal of Social Psychology)

Notable frequent co-authors collaborating with Lammers include:

  • Matthew Baldwin
  • Anna Schulte
  • Adam D. Galinsky
  • Alexandra Fleischmann
  • Jan Crusius

Joris Lammers has published extensively in several key academic venues, including:

  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Their contribution to social psychology and related disciplines is reflected in works addressing perception and leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic, legitimacy perceptions across countries, and social cognition processes. This body of research provides insights into how social and psychological factors influence behavior and attitudes in various societal contexts.

Best Publications

  • Power Increases Hypocrisy Moralizing in Reasoning, Immorality in Behavior

    Joris Lammers;Diederik A. Stapel;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Political diversity in social and personality psychology

    Yoel Inbar;Joris Lammers

  • Illegitimacy Moderates the Effects of Power on Approach

    Joris Lammers;Adam D. Galinsky;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • Power increases social distance

    Joris Lammers;Adam D. Galinsky;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • Successful female leaders empower women's behavior in leadership tasks

    Ioana M. Latu;Marianne Schmid Mast;Joris Lammers;Dario Bombari

  • Power increases dehumanization

    Joris Lammers;Diederik A. Stapel

  • How power influences moral thinking

    Joris Lammers;Diederik A. Stapel

  • Differentiating Social and Personal Power: Opposite Effects on Stereotyping, but Parallel Effects on Behavioral Approach Tendencies:

    Joris Lammers;Janka I. Stoker;Diederik A. Stapel

  • Power Increases Infidelity Among Men and Women

    Joris Lammers;Janka I Stoker;Jennifer Jordan;Monique Pollmann

  • Factors Relating to Managerial Stereotypes: The Role of Gender of the Employee and the Manager and Management Gender Ratio

    Janka I. Stoker;Mandy Van der Velde;Joris Lammers

  • To Have Control Over or to Be Free From Others? The Desire for Power Reflects a Need for Autonomy

    Joris Lammers;Janka I. Stoker;Floortje Rink;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Looking through the eyes of the powerful

    Joris Lammers;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing.

    Joris Lammers;Jan Crusius;Anne Gast

  • Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes

    Joris Lammers;David Dubois;Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.

    Matthew Baldwin;Joris Lammers

  • Power and morality

    Joris Lammers;Adam D Galinsky;David Dubois;Derek D Rucker

  • Abstraction increases hypocrisy

    Joris Lammers

  • Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality

    Joris Lammers;Ernestine H. Gordijn;Sabine Otten

  • The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates.

    Joris Lammers;Alex Koch;Paul Conway;Mark J. Brandt

  • Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income

    Joris Lammers;Janka I. Stoker;Diederik A. Stapel

  • Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas.

    Joris Lammers;Matthew Baldwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
Diederik A. Stapel
Diederik A. Stapel Tilburg University
Sabine Otten
Sabine Otten University of Groningen
Roland Imhoff
Roland Imhoff Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Ilja van Beest
Ilja van Beest Tilburg University
Harry Garretsen
Harry Garretsen University of Groningen
Derek D. Rucker
Derek D. Rucker Northwestern University
Alain Van Hiel
Alain Van Hiel Ghent University
David Dubois
David Dubois University of Illinois at Chicago
Marianne Schmid Mast
Marianne Schmid Mast University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in applying your psychology background to dynamic career opportunities? Many students combine Psychology studies with Social Work, a field that continues to grow across the United States. Online degree programs make it easy to get started, offering flexibility and wide access, whether you are in a major city or a smaller community.

Choosing the right program is essential. If you’re considering the West Coast, take a look at the top social work programs in San Diego as well as the best social work degrees in Tacoma. These programs offer specialized training and connections to local healthcare, community, and counseling organizations.

For a broader perspective, explore some of the top social work programs in USA, which set standards for clinical practice, advocacy, and community leadership. Additionally, if you are based in the Mountain West, review the best social work programs in Utah for highly ranked, accredited options.

Combining Psychology with Social Work opens career paths in mental health, family services, counseling, and policy. With reputable online degrees, you can make a real difference—no matter where you start your journey.

Best Scientists Citing Joris Lammers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles