World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
26054
World Ranking
2030
National Ranking
1182

David Dubois publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Dubois sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 257 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Dubois D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Dubois sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Dubois is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research is primarily focused on the intersection of Medicine and Engineering, with significant contributions in the fields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biomedical Engineering.

The topics they have worked on include:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications

David Dubois has published in the Journal of Digital Imaging. Their recent work includes the paper titled Deep Learning Body Region Classification of MRI and CT Examinations, published in 2023. This paper examines automated classification techniques applied to medical imaging, specifically MRI and CT scans.

The list of frequent co-authors in their research includes:

  • Philippe Raffy
  • Jean-François Pambrun
  • Ashish Kumar
  • Jay Patti
  • Robyn Cairns

Their academic contributions reflect a focus on combining computational methods such as deep learning with practical applications in medical imaging diagnostics. This interdisciplinary approach spans the development and application of imaging techniques and machine learning models that can assist in clinical decision-making.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review.

    David L. DuBois;Bruce E. Holloway;Jeffrey C. Valentine;Harris Cooper

  • The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review.

    Jeffrey C. Valentine;David L. DuBois;Harris Cooper

  • Does Mentoring Matter? A Multidisciplinary Meta-Analysis Comparing Mentored and Non-Mentored Individuals

    Lillian T. Eby;Tammy D. Allen;Sarah C. Evans;Thomas Ng

  • How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence

    David L. DuBois;Nelson Portillo;Jean E. Rhodes;Naida Silverthorn

  • A Prospective Study of Life Stress, Social Support, and Adaptation in Early Adolescence

    David L. DuBois;Robert D. Felner;Stephen Brand;Angela M. Adan

  • Natural Mentoring Relationships and Adolescent Health: Evidence From a National Study

    David L. DuBois;Naida Silverthorn

  • Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value

    Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky;David Dubois

  • Handbook of Youth Mentoring

    David L. DuBois;Michael J. Karcher

  • Mentoring Relationships and Programs for Youth

    Jean E. Rhodes;David L. DuBois

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy of depression and depressive symptoms during adolescence: A review and meta-analysis.

    Mark A. Reinecke;Nancy E. Ryan;David L. DuBOIS

  • Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.

    David Dubois;Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others

    Derek D. Rucker;David Dubois;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Socioeconomic Disadvantage, Proximal Environmental Experiences, and Socioemotional and Academic Adjustment in Early Adolescence: Investigation of a Mediated Effects Model

    Robert D. Felner;Stephen Brand;David L. DuBois;Angela M. Adan

  • Individual and environmental predictors of adjustment during the first year of college.

    James H. Brooks;David L. DuBois

  • Super Size Me: Product Size as a Signal of Status

    David Dubois;Derek D. Rucker;Adam D. Galinsky

  • Characteristics of Natural Mentoring Relationships and Adolescent Adjustment: Evidence from a National Study

    David L. DuBois;Naida Silverthorn

  • Prospective investigation of the effects of socioeconomic disadvantage, life stress, and social support on early adolescent adjustment.

    David L. DuBois;Robert D. Felner;Henry Meares;Marion Krier

  • Mentoring relationships for youth: Investigation of a process-oriented model

    Gilbert R. Parra;David L. DuBois;Helen A. Neville;Aalece O. Pugh-Lilly

  • Understanding and Facilitating the Youth Mentoring Movement

    Jean E. Rhodes;David L. DuBois

  • Youth in Foster Care With Adult Mentors During Adolescence Have Improved Adult Outcomes

    Kym R. Ahrens;David Lane DuBois;Laura P. Richardson;Ming Yu Fan

  • Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits

    David L. DuBois;Helen A. Neville

Frequent Co-Authors

Derek D. Rucker
Derek D. Rucker Northwestern University
Simon Larose
Simon Larose Université Laval
Gilles Laurent
Gilles Laurent Max Planck Society
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Jeffrey C. Valentine
Jeffrey C. Valentine University of Louisville
Alan C. Acock
Alan C. Acock Oregon State University
Helen A. Neville
Helen A. Neville University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mark A. Reinecke
Mark A. Reinecke Northwestern University
Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University
Jean E. Rhodes
Jean E. Rhodes University of Massachusetts Boston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide array of online programs and career opportunities. Many students choose to specialize in mental health counseling, a field that is in high demand across the USA. Understanding regional requirements is crucial as each location may have different educational paths and licensing criteria.

For instance, if you're interested in working in Texas, reviewing the Laredo mental health counselor education requirements is essential. Similarly, if Nevada is your destination, you should learn how to become a mental health counselor in Las Vegas. Students considering Kentucky should explore the Lexington mental health counselor education requirements, while those looking at Nebraska can discover how to become a mental health counselor in Lincoln.

These resources help prospective students understand curriculum options, licensure steps, and career outlooks. Exploring region-specific pathways ensures you are well-prepared for certification and employment after completing your online degree.

Best Scientists Citing David Dubois

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles