World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
8461
World Ranking
7815
National Ranking
4200

Mark A. Reinecke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Reinecke sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark A. Reinecke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Reinecke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark A. Reinecke is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology and related subfields. The scientist's work encompasses areas such as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, digital mental health interventions, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, perfectionism, procrastination, anxiety studies, and cognitive processes involving anxiety and depression treatment.

The topics covered in their work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mark A. Reinecke's published papers include:

  • "Moderators and Predictors of Response After 36 Weeks of Treatment in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)," 2021, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • "Randomized Clinical Trial of Primary Care Based Online Depression Prevention Intervention: Impact on Adolescent Modifiable Factors and Behaviors," 2021, Social Sciences
  • "1.27 Triple Threat: Physical Symptoms, Humiliation/Rejection, and Perfectionism as Predictors or Moderators of Adolescent Depression Treatment Outcomes," 2022, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark A. Reinecke include:

  • Sarah L. O'Dor
  • Jason J. Washburn
  • Kelsey R. Howard
  • Kushagra B. Gupta
  • Calvin Rusiewski

Mark A. Reinecke has contributed primarily to the fields of psychology with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology, alongside research in medicine. Subfields include clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, applied psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and speech and hearing.

Among professional recognitions, Mark A. Reinecke was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2004.

Best Publications

  • The Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): Long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes

    John S. March;Susan Silva;Stephen Petrycki;John Curry

  • Predictors and moderators of acute outcome in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS).

    John Curry;Paul Rohde;Anne Simons;Susan Silva

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy of depression and depressive symptoms during adolescence: A review and meta-analysis.

    Mark A. Reinecke;Nancy E. Ryan;David L. DuBOIS

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression: a meta-analytic investigation of changes in effect-size estimates.

    Jesse B. Klein;Rachel H. Jacobs;Mark A. Reinecke

  • Remission and residual symptoms after short-term treatment in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)

    Betsy Kennard;Susan Silva;Benedetto Vitiello;John Curry

  • Empirical evidence of cognitive vulnerability for depression among children and adolescents: A cognitive science and developmental perspective

    Rachel H. Jacobs;Mark A. Reinecke;Jackie K. Gollan;Peter Kane

  • Recovery and Recurrence Following Treatment for Adolescent Major Depression

    John Curry;Susan Silva;Paul Rohde;Golda Ginsburg

  • Protective and vulnerability factors predicting new-onset depressive episode in a representative of U.S. adolescents.

    Benjamin W. Van Voorhees;David Paunesku;Sachiko A. Kuwabara;Anirban Basu

  • Narcissistic Features in Young Adolescents: Relations to Aggression and Internalizing Symptoms

    Jason J. Washburn;Susan D. McMahon;Cheryl A. King;Mark A. Reinecke

  • Randomized clinical trial of an Internet-based depression prevention program for adolescents (Project CATCH-IT) in primary care: 12-week outcomes.

    Benjamin W. Van Voorhees;Joshua Fogel;Mark A Reinecke;Tracy Gladstone

  • Remission and recovery in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): acute and long-term outcomes.

    Betsy D. Kennard;Betsy D. Kennard;Susan G. Silva;Simon Tonev;Paul Rohde

  • Psychometric characteristics of the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS): Reliability and factor structure for men and women.

    Mark A. Stein;Ron Sandoval;Emily Szumowski;Nancy Roizen

  • Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): Rationale, design, and methods

    John March;Susan Silva;Stephen Petrycki;John Curry

  • Suicidal events in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS).

    Benedetto Vitiello;Susan G. Silva;Paul Rohde;Christopher J. Kratochvil

  • The treatment for adolescents with depression study (TADS): Outcomes over 1 year of naturalistic follow-up

    John March;Susan Silva;John Curry;Karen Wells

  • Cognitive Therapy with Children and Adolescents: A Casebook for Clinical Practice

    Mark A. Reinecke;Frank M. Dattilio;Arthur M. Freeman

  • Assessing Depressive Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis: Is It Necessary to Omit Items from the Original Beck Depression Inventory?

    J. E. Aikens;M. A. Reinecke;Neil H. Pliskin;J. S. Fischer

  • Social problem-solving among adolescents treated for depression.

    Emily G. Becker-Weidman;Rachel H. Jacobs;Mark A. Reinecke;Susan G. Silva

  • The Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS): Demographic and clinical characteristics

    John March;Susan Silva;Stephen Petrycki;John Curry

  • Functioning and quality of life in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS).

    Benedetto Vitiello;Paul Rohde;Susan Silva;Karen Wells

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. March
John S. March Duke University
John F. Curry
John F. Curry Duke University
Benedetto Vitiello
Benedetto Vitiello University of Turin
Paul Rohde
Paul Rohde Oregon Research Institute
Golda S. Ginsburg
Golda S. Ginsburg University of Connecticut
Graham J. Emslie
Graham J. Emslie The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Anne D. Simons
Anne D. Simons University of Notre Dame
Betsy D. Kennard
Betsy D. Kennard The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Norah C. Feeny
Norah C. Feeny Case Western Reserve University
Karen C. Wells
Karen C. Wells Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a broad range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students interested in human behavior and mental health pursue careers in counseling, therapy, or social work. With the increasing availability of online programs, earning your degree is now more accessible than ever, allowing you to study at your own pace and from any location.

When choosing a program, it's important to consider specialization areas, accreditation, and state licensing requirements. Exploring resources like the best counseling program rankings in Tucson can help you find highly regarded programs that fit your career interests. If you are based in Texas, check out the best counseling degree programs in Texas for regional options. Students in the Pacific Northwest may benefit from reviewing the best counseling program rankings in Washington.

If you're interested in policy, research, or clinical practice in urban environments, take a look at the best college counseling programs in Washington, D.C. Overall, researching top programs in your area can help you make an informed decision about your educational journey and future psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Reinecke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles