World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 45 2845 2585 191 177 134 10205

Marco Groth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Groth between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Groth published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2023. 14 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2023. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Groth: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 4
2009 2
2010 6
2011 6
2012 10
2013 11
2014 17
2015 15
2016 11
2017 10
2018 14
2019 14
2020 15
2021 8
2022 16
2023 27
2024 13
2025 13
2026 1
Total 214
Download as CSV

Marco Groth publications per year - data summary

  • Marco Groth, a Molecular Biology scholar from Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, has 214 publications recorded across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2006 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2006 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 21 years in the span carries no publications at all (2007).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.7 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 70 publications, 33% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2006-2012: 29 publications (4.1 per year); 2013-2019: 92 publications (13.1 per year); 2020-2026: 93 publications (13.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marco Groth publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Groth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 134 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 134
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Groth publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Marco Groth, a Molecular Biology scholar from Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, records 134 publications - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Marco Groth, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Marco Groth ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Marco Groth D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Groth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 45
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Groth D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Marco Groth, a Molecular Biology scholar from Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, records 45 D-Index - the 8th percentile of the discipline.
  • 8% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Marco Groth, and about 92% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Marco Groth ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Marco Groth is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute in Germany. Their research spans various aspects of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a total of 80 publications in this broad field. Within this domain, they have contributed extensively to molecular biology (54 publications), immunology (12 publications), nature and landscape conservation (11 publications), plant science (10 publications), and ecology (8 publications).

Their main topics of research include RNA research and splicing, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, fish biology, ecology and behavior, epigenetics and DNA methylation, genetics, aging and longevity in model organisms, bacteriophages and microbial interactions, and plant virus research studies, with publication counts ranging from 10 to 14 in each area.

Marco Groth has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including Philipp Koch (17 collaborations), Steve Hoffmann (11 collaborations), Alessandro Cellerino (11 collaborations), Konstantin Riege (8 collaborations), and Arne Sahm (8 collaborations).

Publication venues where Groth has published repeatedly include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 11 papers, Cells (4 papers), Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie (4 papers), Nature Communications (3 papers), and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences (3 papers).

Recent scientific papers by Marco Groth include:

  • Microglia mediate neurocognitive deficits by eliminating C1q-tagged synapses in sepsis-associated encephalopathy, 2023, Science Advances
  • The genome, transcriptome, and proteome of the fish parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala), 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Taz protects hematopoietic stem cells from an aging-dependent decrease in PU.1 activity, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Tnfaip2/exoc3-driven lipid metabolism is essential for stem cell differentiation and organ homeostasis, 2020, EMBO Reports
  • CD44 Contributes to the Regulation of MDR1 Protein and Doxorubicin Chemoresistance in Osteosarcoma, 2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome

    Klaus F.X. Mayer;Robbie Waugh;Peter Langridge;Timothy J. Close

  • A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome

    Martin Mascher;Heidrun Gundlach;Axel Himmelbach;Sebastian Beier

  • Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution

    Betsy A. Read;Jessica Kegel;Mary J. Klute;Alan Kuo

  • Impaired Insulin/IGF1 Signaling Extends Life Span by Promoting Mitochondrial L-Proline Catabolism to Induce a Transient ROS Signal

    Kim Zarse;Kim Zarse;Sebastian Schmeisser;Sebastian Schmeisser;Marco Groth;Steffen Priebe

  • Insights into Sex Chromosome Evolution and Aging from the Genome of a Short-Lived Fish.

    Kathrin Reichwald;Andreas Petzold;Philipp Koch;Bryan R Downie

  • D -Glucosamine supplementation extends life span of nematodes and of ageing mice

    Sandra Weimer;Josephine Priebs;Doreen Kuhlow;Marco Groth

  • Role of sirtuins in lifespan regulation is linked to methylation of nicotinamide

    Kathrin Schmeisser;Johannes Mansfeld;Johannes Mansfeld;Doreen Kuhlow;Sandra Weimer

  • Comparative and functional genomics provide insights into the pathogenicity of dermatophytic fungi

    Anke Burmester;Anke Burmester;Ekaterina Shelest;Gernot Glöckner;Christoph Heddergott;Christoph Heddergott

  • DNA methylation analysis of chromosome 21 gene promoters at single base pair and single allele resolution

    Yingying Zhang;Christian Rohde;Sascha Tierling;Tomasz P. Jurkowski

  • Construction of a map-based reference genome sequence for barley, Hordeum vulgare L.

    Sebastian Beier;Axel Himmelbach;Christian Colmsee;Xiao Qi Zhang

  • Neuronal ROS signaling rather than AMPK/sirtuin-mediated energy sensing links dietary restriction to lifespan extension.

    Sebastian Schmeisser;Steffen Priebe;Marco Groth;Shamci Monajembashi

  • Mitochondrial hormesis links low-dose arsenite exposure to lifespan extension

    Sebastian Schmeisser;Kathrin Schmeisser;Sandra Weimer;Marco Groth

  • RNA-seq of the aging brain in the short-lived fish N. furzeri – conserved pathways and novel genes associated with neurogenesis

    Mario Baumgart;Marco Groth;Steffen Priebe;Aurora Savino

  • Branched-chain amino acid catabolism is a conserved regulator of physiological ageing

    Johannes Mansfeld;Nadine Urban;Steffen Priebe;Marco Groth

  • Longitudinal RNA-Seq Analysis of Vertebrate Aging Identifies Mitochondrial Complex I as a Small-Molecule-Sensitive Modifier of Lifespan

    Mario Baumgart;Steffen Priebe;Marco Groth;Nils Hartmann

  • Smg6/Est1 licenses embryonic stem cell differentiation via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.

    Tangliang Li;Yue Shi;Pei Wang;Luis Miguel Guachalla

  • Assisted reproductive technologies do not enhance the variability of DNA methylation imprints in human

    Sascha Tierling;Nicole Y Souren;Jasmin Gries;Christina Loporto

  • Endosymbiotic Gene Transfer and Transcriptional Regulation of Transferred Genes in Paulinella chromatophora

    Eva C.M. Nowack;Eva C.M. Nowack;Heiko Vogel;Marco Groth;Arthur R. Grossman

  • Transcriptomic alterations during ageing reflect the shift from cancer to degenerative diseases in the elderly.

    Peer Aramillo Irizar;Sascha Schäuble;Daniela Esser;Marco Groth

  • MicroRNA miR-29 controls a compensatory response to limit neuronal iron accumulation during adult life and aging

    Roberto Ripa;Luca Dolfi;Marco Terrigno;Luca Pandolfini

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Platzer
Matthias Platzer Leibniz Association
Reinhard Guthke
Reinhard Guthke Leibniz Association
Christoph Englert
Christoph Englert Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Stefan Taudien
Stefan Taudien Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Michael Ristow
Michael Ristow École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Hans A. Kestler
Hans A. Kestler University of Ulm
Gernot Glöckner
Gernot Glöckner University of Cologne
Roland Zell
Roland Zell Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Hynek Burda
Hynek Burda University of Duisburg-Essen
Philip Rosenstiel
Philip Rosenstiel Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology often leads to diverse and dynamic career opportunities. For some, related fields like speech-language pathology can be appealing, especially for those who are curious whether can you become a speech pathologist with an education degree. This showcases how science and healthcare intersect and broadens career flexibility.

The growth of online education has opened doors to fields beyond biology. For instance, an online architecture degree blends science with creativity and provides a technical foundation for building and design roles. Similarly, pursuing a bachelor in mathematics online equips students with analytical skills valued across biotech, research, and data-driven sectors.

Creative pathways like graphic design also benefit from scientific thinking and problem-solving. If you’re interested in design, a best 2 year graphic design degree online offers flexibility and fast entry into creative industries. Exploring online programs means you can tailor your education to fit both your scientific interests and career goals, giving you the freedom to pursue interdisciplinary opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Groth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles