World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
74
Citations
34859
World Ranking
788
National Ranking
271

William Bialek publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Bialek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 225 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

William Bialek D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Bialek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Max Delbruck Prize, Division of Biological Physics of the American Physical Society For the application of general theoretical principles of physics and information theory to help understand and predict how biological systems function across a variety of scales, from molecules and cells, to brains and animal collectives.
  • 2013 - Swartz Prize for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience
  • 2012 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1996 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For his contributions in understanding the neural code and the optimization of neural processing through application of the methods of theoretical physics to problems in neuroscience

Overview

William Bialek is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The main focus of their research includes areas such as Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Artificial Intelligence, with additional work in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and General Health Professions.

Their research topics span several key areas:

  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Stochastic dynamics and bifurcation

Frequent publication venues where William Bialek has contributed include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Physical Review E
  • Physical Review Letters
  • PRX Life

Bialek has coauthored multiple papers with several researchers. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Thomas Gregor
  • Christopher W. Lynn
  • Mariela D. Petkova
  • Stephanie E. Palmer
  • Qiwei Yu

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by William Bialek are:

  • "embo - Empirical Bottleneck" (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "On the dimensionality of behavior" (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Long Timescales, Individual Differences, and Scale Invariance in Animal Behavior" (2024), Physical Review Letters
  • "Finding the Last Bits of Positional Information" (2024), PRX Life
  • "Information Bottleneck in Molecular Sensing" (2023), PRX Life

William Bialek has been recognized with several awards throughout their career. These include the Max Delbruck Prize from the Division of Biological Physics of the American Physical Society in 2018, awarded for contributions in applying physics and information theory principles to biological systems. They also received the Swartz Prize for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience in 2013 and were elected a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2012. Earlier, in 1996, Bialek was named a Fellow of the American Physical Society with a citation noting their contributions to understanding the neural code and neural processing optimization through theoretical physics methods.

Best Publications

  • Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code

    Fred Rieke;Davd Warland;Rob de Ruyter van Steveninck;William Bialek

  • The information bottleneck method

    Naftali Tishby;Fernando C. N. Pereira;William Bialek

  • Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods.

    Daniel L. Ruderman;Daniel L. Ruderman;William Bialek;William Bialek

  • Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population.

    Elad Schneidman;Michael J. Berry;Ronen Segev;William Bialek

  • READING A NEURAL CODE

    W Bialek;F Rieke;RR de Ruyter van Steveninck;D Warland

  • Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains

    S. P. Strong;Roland Koberle;Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck;William Bialek

  • Are biological systems poised at criticality

    Thierry Mora;Thierry Mora;William Bialek

  • Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code.

    Adrienne L. Fairhall;Geoffrey D. Lewen;William Bialek;Robert R. de Ruyter van Steveninck

  • Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds

    William Bialek;Andrea Cavagna;Irene Giardina;Thierry Mora

  • Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission

    Naama Brenner;William Bialek;Rob de Ruyter van Steveninck

  • Probing the limits to positional information

    Thomas Gregor;David W. Tank;Eric F. Wieschaus;Eric F. Wieschaus;William Bialek

  • Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains

    Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck;Geoffrey D. Lewen;Steven P. Strong;Roland Koberle

  • Predictability, Complexity, and Learning

    William Bialek;Ilya Nemenman;Naftali Tishby

  • Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale

    Stelios M. Smirnakis;Michael J. Berry;David K. Warland;William Bialek

  • Dimensionality and Dynamics in the Behavior of C. elegans

    Greg J. Stephens;Bethany Johnson-Kerner;William Bialek;William S. Ryu

  • Stability and nuclear dynamics of the Bicoid morphogen gradient

    Thomas Gregor;Eric F. Wieschaus;Eric F. Wieschaus;Alistair P. McGregor;William Bialek

  • Physical limits to biochemical signaling

    William Bialek;Sima Setayeshgar;Sima Setayeshgar

  • Synergy in a Neural Code

    Naama Brenner;Steven P. Strong;Roland P. Koberle;William P. Bialek

  • Analyzing Neural Responses to Natural Signals: Maximally Informative Dimensions

    Tatyana Sharpee;Nicole C. Rust;William C. Bialek

  • NATURALISTIC STIMULI INCREASE THE RATE AND EFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION TRANSMISSION BY PRIMARY AUDITORY AFFERENTS

    F Rieke;D A Bodnar;W Bialek

Frequent Co-Authors

Gašper Tkačik
Gašper Tkačik Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Eric Wieschaus
Eric Wieschaus Princeton University
Fred Rieke
Fred Rieke University of Washington
David W. Tank
David W. Tank Princeton University
Naftali Tishby
Naftali Tishby Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Stephen G. Lisberger
Stephen G. Lisberger Duke University
Carlos D. Brody
Carlos D. Brody Princeton University
A. Zee
A. Zee University of California, Santa Barbara
Adrienne L. Fairhall
Adrienne L. Fairhall University of Washington
José N. Onuchic
José N. Onuchic Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing William Bialek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles